An Empirical Relation between Static and Dynamic Brittleness Indices

References

1. Cao, Z., Liu, G., Kong, Y., Wang, C., Niu, Z., and Zhang, J., et al.
   [2016]. Lacustrine tight oil accumulation characteristics: permian lucaogou formation in jimusaer sag, junggar basin. Internationaljournal of Coal Geology, 153, 37–51.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Chu, Z. H.
   [1987]. Acoustic logging principle. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Guo, Z., Chapman, M., and Li, X.
   [2012]. A shale rock physics model and its application in the prediction of brittleness index, mineralogy, and porosity of the Barnett Shale. SEG Technical Program Expanded, 1, 1–5.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Jarvie, D. M., Hill, R. J., Ruble, T. E., and Pollastro, R. M.
   [2007]. Unconventional shale-gas systems: the mississippian barnett shale of north-central texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment. Aapg Bulletin, 91(4) 475–499.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Lai, J., Wang, G., Fan, Z., Chen, J., Wang, S., and Zhou, Z.
   [2016]. Research progress in brittleness index evaluation methods with logging data in unconventional oil and gas reservoirs. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 03, 330–341.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Rickman, R., Mullen, M. J., Petre, J. E., Grieser, W. V., and Kundert, D.
   [2008]. A Practical Use of Shale Petrophysics for Stimulation Design Optimization: All Shale Plays Are Not Clones of the Barnett Shale. SPE Technical Conference and Exhibition.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Zisman, W. A.
   [1933]. Comparison of the statically and seismologically determined elastic constants of rocks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 19(7) 680–686.
   [Google Scholar]