1887

Abstract

Summary

Accurate estimation of the local reservoir responses - including the AVO information - is crucial for correctly estimating the elastic parameters from the target area. In this paper the estimation of the target reflection responses is implemented as part of the full wavefield imaging algorithm that handles multiple scattering not only by suppressing undesired overburden imprints but also by using its information for obtaining a better estimate of the responses. The newly obtained inversion problem includes the two main components — full wavefield migration (FWM) of the overburden - yielding its reflectivity properties - combined with the estimation of the local reflection impulse responses of the target area located below. Both sets of parameters are included in the forward model and should simultaneously fit the observed surface data in the least-squares manner. The main advantage of this combined approach is that multiple scattering and transmission effects in the overburden are correctly accounted for, yielding high-quality target impulse responses. It is shown that estimating the responses in this manner is also suitable for the 3D case, where sparse acquisition geometries provide an additional challenge.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800871
2018-06-11
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berkhout, A.J.
    [1982] Seismic migration, imaging of acoustic energy by wave field extrapolation, A: theoretical aspects. Elsevier (second edition). ISBN:0-444-41904-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. [2014a] Review Paper: An outlook on the future of seismic imaging, Part I: forward and reverse modelling. Geophysical Prospecting, 62(5), 911–930.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. [2014b] Review Paper: An outlook on the future of seismic imaging, Part II: Full-Wavefield Migration. Geophysical Prospecting, 62(5), 931–949.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Berryhill, J.R.
    [1984] Wave equation datuming before stack (short note). Geophysics, 49(11), 2064–2066.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Davydenko, M. and Verschuur, D.
    [2017] Full-wavefield migration: using surface and internal multiples in imaging. Geophysical Prospecting, 65(1), 7–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Garg, A. and Verschuur, D.
    [2016] Reservoir Impulse Response Estimation Using Joint Migration Inversion. In: 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gisolf, A. and van den Berg, P.
    [2012] Target-oriented elastic full wave form inversion. In: 74th EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating EUROPEC2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gisolf, A., Haffinger, P. and Doulgeris, P.
    [2015] Redatuming Directly to Angle Gathers, for the Purpose of Target Oriented Quantitative Interpretation. In: 77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Wapenaar, C.P.A. and Berkhout, A.J.
    [1989] Elastic wave field extrapolation: redatuming of single- and multi-component seismic data. Elsevier Science Publ. Co., Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Weiss, R.M. and Shragge, J.
    [2013] Solving 3D anisotropic elastic wave equations on parallel GPU devices. Geophysics.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800871
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800871
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error