1887

Abstract

Summary

Full waveform inversion (FWI) is a multi-objective constrained optimization which provides subsurface model with a seismic wavelength resolution. However, this high resolution potential also makes the inverse problem highly nonlinear. The frequency-domain FWI based on wavefield reconstruction (WRI) recasts the constrained optimization in a penalty method, which iteratively reconstructs the wavefield and the subsurface parameters in an alternating mode. At each iteration of a cycle work-flow, the wavefield reconstruction is first steered towards the observations such that the subsurface parameters are estimated from an improved wavefield in a second step. Here, we recast the two sub-problems embedded in WRI as linear problems and use Bregman iterations to strictly enforce the constraints in the penalty method through the iterative refinement of the right-hand sides (seismic sources and data) of the two linear sub-problems. The improvements resulting from this iterative refinement are illustrated with a toy example and the MarmousiII model when a crude initial model is used. We show how the iterative refinement improves the reconstruction of the short-scale structures, speeds up convergence and makes the method more resilient to noise although no regularization was used. The method can be improved with additional constraints such as total variation minimization.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800886
2018-06-11
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Epanomeritakis, I., Akçelik, V., Ghattas, O. and Bielak, J.
    [2008] A Newton-CG method for large-scale three-dimensional elastic full waveform seismic inversion. Inverse Problems, 24, 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Goldstein, T. and Osher, S.
    [2009] The split Bregman method for L1-regularized problems. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 2(2), 323–343.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Haber, E., Ascher, U.M. and Oldenburg, D.
    [2000] On optimization techniques for solving nonlinear inverse problems. Inverse problems, 16(5), 1263.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Marfurt, K.
    [1984] Accuracy of finite-difference and finite-element modeling of the scalar and elastic wave equations. Geophysics, 49, 533–549.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. van Leeuwen, T. and Herrmann, F.
    [2016] A penalty method for PDE-constrained optimization in inverse problems. Inverse Problems, 32(1), 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. van Leeuwen, T. and Herrmann, F.J.
    [2013] Mitigating local minima in full-waveform inversion by expanding the search space. Geophysical Journal International, doi:10.1093/gji/ggt258.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt258 [Google Scholar]
  7. Yin, W., Osher, S., Goldfarb, D. and Darbon, J.
    [2008] Bregman iterative algorithms for l1-minimization with applications to compressed sensing. SIAM Journal Imaging Sciences, 1(1), 143–168.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800886
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800886
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error