1887

Abstract

Summary

Challenges of oil&gas exploration and production of shale plays, horizontal wells drilling and increasing complexity of the explored reservoirs demand for significant improvement of accuracy and resolution of geological models which can be only provided by geophysical interpretation paradigm shift. The technologies based on simplified pair relationships between seismic attributes and geological parameters must be added by Big Data, machine learning and Artificial Intelligence methodologies to reveal informative combinations of geophysical data really characterizing space variations of reservoir properties. At the same time incompleteness, inhomogeneity and nonstationarity of training datasets from wells inevitably lead to high risks of false correlations and incorrect predictions. It is also a challenge for a specialist to trust to statistical “black box” computing results. Cognitive modeling alows to optimize initial set of attributes for multidimensional interpretation, to explain statistically derived relationships using geological and geophysical principles and trends, to accumulate knowledge about informative geophysical methods for various geological settings and to apply the accumulated knowledge database for solving exploration and production problems. The successful case study is reported for tight Tymen reservoir in Western Siberia where cognitive modeling allowed to map predictive oil saturation coeficient using log and seismic data

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800905
2018-06-11
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AmpilovY.P.
    From Seismic Interpretation to Modelling and Assessment of Oil and Gas Fields. - EAGE Publications bv, p 1–274
    [Google Scholar]
  2. V.Kolesov
    . Big Data Technologies in Oil Exploration - Is It the Time to Change Intepretation Paradigm?19th Science and Applied Research Conference on Oil and Gas Geological Exploration and Development «Geomodel 2017» — Gelendzhik, Russia, 11–14 September 2017 (in Russian)
    [Google Scholar]
  3. LucyFoley, LeslieBall, AndrewHurst, JohnDavis and DavidBlockley
    . Fuzziness, incompleteness and randomness: classification of uncertainty in reservoir appraisal — Petroleum Geoscience, 1997, Vol 3, No 3, pp. 203–209
    [Google Scholar]
  4. V.Kolessov, I.Datsenko, T.Kutepova
    . From imaging of geophysical data to imaging of geological properties -. EAGE 63rd Conference & Technical Exhibition — Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 11–15 June 2001
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kurt J.Marfurt
    . Seismic Attributes and the Road Ahead - Geophysical Society of Houston, October 2015 pp.11–17
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800905
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800905
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error