1887

Abstract

Summary

Reservoir characterisation is a data driven process which involves the integration of different datasets to describe the subsurface. One of the difficulties of integrating geological data with the wave-equation based seismic inversion is that geological information is invariably interpreted as a layer-based model, whereas the wave-equation is defined and solved on a grid. Mapping a layer-based model space onto a grid-based space leads to highly non-Gaussian, multi-modal distribution functions, even when the layer-based properties have simple Gaussian distributions.

In this paper an analytic method is presented that translates the prior layer-model based distributions to grid-based prior distributions. From the unconstrained seismic inversion result a Gaussian likelihood function is constructed and the method to find the maximum a posterior estimate (MAP) and its uncertainty is described. As geological prior information we use well data, a geological concept of the environment of deposition and structural seismic interpretation in the form of some horizons to guide the prior model in between wells.

Given the prior model, a measure for the probability of the data is formulated. When this process is repeated for various prior scenarios, the probability of the scenario, given the data, can be calculated for every location.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800926
2018-06-11
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. D.Tetyukhina, S.M.Luthi, and D.Gisolf
    , 2014, “Acoustic non-linear full-waveform inversion on an outcrop-based detailed geological and petrophysical model (book cliffs, utah)” AAPG Bulletin, pages 98(1), 119–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Feng, R et al.
    . 2017,”Obtaining a high-resolution geological and petrophysical model from the results of reservoir-orientated elastic wave-equation-based seismic inversion” Petroleum Geoscience, DOI:10.1144/petgeo2015‑07.
    https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2015-07 [Google Scholar]
  3. . 2015, “An Outcrop-based Detailed Geological Model to Test Automated Interpretation of Seismic Inversion Results”. 77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Huberty, C. J. Feng, R
    2014. Mahalanobis Distance. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Rizzuti, G. and Gisolf, A.
    , 2017An iterative method for 2D inverse scattering problems by alternating reconstruction of medium properties and wavefields: theory and application to the inversion of elastic waveforms” Inverse Problems 33 035003
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800926
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800926
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error