1887

Abstract

Summary

The quality factor is a powerful tool for hydrocarbon detection and reservoir characterization in seismic data processing and interpretation. There are various methods for Q estimation, such as centroid frequency shift method (CFS), frequency weighted exponential method (FWE) and peak frequency shift (PFS). However each method has its own limitations. Compared with the CFS method which is under the assumption of particular source wavelet types, the FWE method is applicable for various wavelet types. In this paper, we proposed a novel method to calculate the two parameters of FWE function by the mean frequency and its deviation of power spectrum. Meanwhile we developed a new relationship between FWE function and the Q factor of the media. Synthetic data prove that the proposed method is more robust to random noise compared with traditional FWE function. Meanwhile field data test using this method also demonstrates its potential in reservoir characterization.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800944
2018-06-11
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. HuW, J.Liu, L.Bear and C.Marcinkovich
    [2011] A robust and accurate seismic attenuation tomography algorithm. 81th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstract, 2727–2731.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Quan, Y and Harris, J.M.
    [1997] Seismic attenuation tomography using the frequency shift method. Geophysics, 62(3), 895–905.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ChuanhuiLiu and XueweiLiu
    , [2015] A new method for interval Q-factor inversion from seismic reflection data. Geophysics, VOL. 80, NO. 6 November–December 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. QianWang, JinghuaiGao et al.
    . [2016] Q estimation with improved frequency shift method based on generalized seismic wavelet. SEG International Exposition and 86th Annual Meeting.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen, L. & Lee, C.
    , [1989]. Standard deviation of instantaneous frequency, in IEEE Proceedings of International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Glasgow, pp. 2238–2241.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800944
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800944
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error