1887

Abstract

Summary

Quantifying the impact of pore fill on elastic properties of porous rocks is of ongoing interets in geophysics. Previous experiements show that the change of the solid pore fill can produce larger change in effective elastic properties of porous rocks than predicted by exisiting models. This effect may result from the heterogeneous stress distribution within the pore space due to the existence of stiff and soft pores. In this paper, we present a new solid substitution scheme based on the concept of a triple pore structure, including stiff, compliant and so-called intermediate pores. Comparison of the model predictions against ultrasonic measurements on an Octodecane-saturated sandstone reveal a reasonable fit for the bulk modulus but a small discrepancy for the shear modulus, performing more accurately than previous models. This discrepancy might be resulted from the instability of ultrasonic measurements at relative small confining pressure.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801025
2018-06-11
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ciz, R., & Shapiro, S. A.
    (2007). Generalization of Gassmann equations for porous media saturated with a solid material. Geophysics, 72(6), A75–A79.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. de Paula, O. B., Pervukhina, M., Makarynska, D., & Gurevich, B.
    (2012). Modeling squirt dispersion and attenuation in fluid-saturated rocks using pressure dependency of dry ultrasonic velocities. Geophysics, 77(3), WA157–WA168.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gassmann, F.
    (1951). Uber die Elastizitat poroser Medien: Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zurich Vol. 96.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Glubokovskikh, S., Gurevich, B., & Saxena, N.
    (2016). A dual - porosity scheme for fluid/solid substitution. Geophysical Prospecting, 64(4), 1112–1121.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gurevich, B., Makarynska, D., & Pervukhina, M.
    (2009). Ultrasonic moduli for fluid-saturated rocks: Mavko-Jizba relations rederived and generalized. Geophysics, 74(4), N25–N30.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hudson, J. A.
    (1981). Wave speeds and attenuation of elastic waves in material containing cracks. Geophysical Journal International, 64(1), 133–150.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Leurer, K. C., & Dvorkin, J.
    (2006). Viscoelasticity of precompacted unconsolidated sand with viscous cement. Geophysics, 71(2), T31–T40.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Makarynska, D., Gurevich, B., Behura, J., & BatzleM.
    (2010). Fluid substitution in rocks saturated with viscoelastic fluids. Geophysics, 75(2), E115–E122.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Saxena, N., & Mavko, G.
    (2014). Exact equations for fluid and solid substitution. Geophysics, 79(3), L21–L32.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Schoenberg, M., & Douma, J.
    (1988). Elastic wave propagation in media with parallel fractures and aligned cracks. Geophysical Prospecting, 36(6), 571–590.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Shapiro, S. A.
    (2003). Elastic piezosensitivity of porous and fractured rocks. Geophysics, 68(2), 482–486.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Tsai, H.-C., & Lee, C.-C.
    (1998). Compressive stiffness of elastic layers bonded between rigid plates. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 35(23), 3053–3069.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Xu, S., & White, R. E.
    (1995). A new velocity model for clay-sand mixtu res. Geophysical Prospecting, 43(1), 91–118.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801025
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801025
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error