FWI with Optimal Transport: a 3D Implementation and an Application on a Field Dataset

References

1. Engquist, B. and Froese, B. D.
   [2014] Application of the Wasserstein metric to seismic signals. Communications in Mathematical Sciences12, 979–988.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Lellmann, J., Lorenz, D. A., Schönlieb, C. and Valkonen, T.
   [2014] Imaging with Kantorovich--Rubinstein Discrepancy. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences7, 2833–2859.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Métivier, L., Brossier, R., Mérigot, Q., Oudet, E. and Virieux, J.
   [2016] Measuring the misfit between seismograms using an optimal transport distance: Application to full waveform inversion. Geophysical Journal International205, 345–377.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Métivier, L., Brossier, R., Mérigot, Q., Oudet, E. and Virieux, J.
   [2016b] An optimal transport approach for seismic tomography: application to 3D full waveform inversion. Inverse Problems32, 115008.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Plessix, R. E.
   [2006] A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications. Communications in Mathematical Sciences12, 979–988.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Qiu, L., Ramos-Martínez, J., Valenciano, A., Yang, Y. and Engquist, B.
   [2017] Full waveform inversion with an exponentially-encoded optimal transport norm. 87th SEG Expanded Abstracts, p 1286.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Villani, C.
   [2008] Optimal transport: Old and new. Springer, Berlin.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Yang, Y., Engquist, B., Sun, J. and Froese, B. D.
   [2017] Application of Optimal Transport and the Quadratic Wasserstein Metric to Full-Waveform Inversion. Accepted for publication in Geophysics.