1887

Abstract

Summary

Retrieval of the homogeneous Green’s function is often done using a single-sided boundary, even though the theory states that an enclosing boundary is required. In recent years the theory has been modified to create a single-sided representation. This is done by using the Marchenko method, to redatum the wavefield from the boundary to a virtual receiver location inside the medium. The results on synthetic data have been encouraging, but on field data this method is largely unproven, due to the fact that the Marchenko method assumes that the medium is lossless, which in practice it is not. We have shown how to apply the classical representation and that it does not deliver the desired result on the field data. We have also demonstrated how to apply the new representation on the field data and that the result has improved over the classical representation. We visualize the result as snapshots over a region of interest to show the propagation of the wavefield through the medium.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801071
2018-06-11
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alkhimenkov, Y.
    [2017] Redatuming and Quantifying Attenuation from Reflection Data Using the Marchenko Equation: A Novel Approach to Quantify Q-factor and Seismic Upscaling. TU Delft online repository.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brackenhoff, J.
    [2016] Rescaling of incorrect source strength using Marchenko redatuming. TU Delft online repository.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Broggini, F. and Snieder, R.
    [2012] Connection of scattering principles: A visual and mathematical tour. European Journal of Physics, 33(3), 593.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Broggini, F., Snieder, R. and Wapenaar, K.
    [2012] Focusing the wavefield inside an unknown 1D medium: Beyond seismic interferometry. Geophysics, 77(5), A25–A28.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Oristaglio, M.L.
    [1989] An inverse scattering formula that uses all the data. Inverse Problems, 5(6), 1097.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Porter, R.P.
    [1970] Diffraction-limited, scalar image formation with holograms of arbitrary shape. JOSA, 60(8), 1051–1059.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ravasi, M., Vasconcelos, I., Kritski, A., Curtis, A., Filho, C.A.d.C. and Meles, G.A.
    [2016] Target-oriented Marchenko imaging of a North Sea field. Geophysical Supplements to the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 205(1), 99–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Singh, S., Snieder, R., van der Neut, J., Thorbecke, J., Slob, E. and Wapenaar, K.
    [2016] Accounting for free-surface multiples in Marchenko imaging. Geophysics.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Van Groenestijn, G. and Verschuur, D.
    [2009] Estimation of primaries and near-offset reconstruction by sparse inversion: Marine data applications. Geophysics, 74(6), R119–R128.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wapenaar, K., Thorbecke, J., Neut, J., Slob, E. and Snieder, R.
    [2017] Virtual sources and their responses, Part II: data-driven single-sided focusing. Geophysical Prospecting.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wapenaar, K., Thorbecke, J., Van Der Neut, J., Broggini, F., Slob, E. and Snieder, R.
    [2014] Marchenko imaging. Geophysics, 79(3), WA39–WA57.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801071
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801071
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error