1887

Abstract

Summary

Land surveys suffer from rapid variations in velocity in the near-surface weathering layer that degrade seismic images when the velocity variations are not accounted for in imaging. While elevation information or refraction tomography can compensate for long and mid-wavelength variations, residual static algorithms are used to correct for the shorter wavelengths. Residual statics are commonly estimated by maximising lateral coherency in gathers after Normal Move-Out corrections, either by measuring trace-to-trace correlation or overall stack power. This work introduces an alternative method able to estimate residual statics using a cost function based on sparseness in gathers without a-priori knowledge about velocities needed for NMO correction. By maximizing sparsity in the tau-v and tau-p domains the method enhances coherency assuming, respectively, hyperbolic reflections in the case of mid-wavelength residual statics and local linearity in the case of shorter wavelength residual statics. Results from 2D and 3D data show overall improvement in stack power and focus, as well as reflector positioning, when the sparseness method is used before picking velocities for imaging. To complete the flow, stack optimisation methods can be run as a post-process to further add constructively to the stack.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801110
2018-06-11
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hurley, N. and Rickard, S.
    [2009] Comparing Measures of Sparsity. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,55(10), 4723–4741.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Le Meur, D.
    [2011] Monte-Carlo Statics on Large 3D Wide-azimuth Data. 73rd EAGE Conference and Exhibition.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Marsden, D.
    [1993] Static corrections — a review, part I. The Leading Edge,12(1), 43–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ronen, J. and Claerbout, J. F.
    [1985] Surface-consistent residual statics estimation by stack-power maximization. Geophysics,50(12), 2759–2767.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Rothman, D. H.
    [1986] Automatic estimation of large residual statics corrections.Geophysics,51(2), 332–346.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sághy, G. and Zelei, A.
    [1975] Advanced method for self-adaptive estimation of residual static corrections. Geophysical Prospecting,23(2): 259–274.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Taner, M. T., Koehler, F. and Alhilali, K. A.
    [1974] Estimation and Correction of Near-Surface Time Anomalies. Geophysics,39(4), 441–463.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Vasudevan, K., Wilson, W. G. and Laidlaw, W. G.
    [1991] Simulated annealing statics computation using an order-based energy function. Geophysics,56(11), 1831–1839.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Wiggins, R. A., Larner, K. L. and Wisecup, R. D.
    [1976] Residual Statics Analysis as a General Linear Inverse Problem. Geophysics,41(5), 922–938.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801110
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801110
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error