1887

Abstract

Summary

In this research, we investigate and characterize the oil bank mobilization on a single-mineral porous medial “Fontainebleau sandstone” ( ). Chemicals (surfactant and polymer) are used to mobilize the trapped/residual oil and build up the oil bank. The understanding of favorable physical, chemical and spatial conditions of when and how an oil bank is formed is very limited. It is more applicable when coreflow experiments are upscaled from core scale to field scale

Coreflow experiments were carrried out in high end setup which provide us with the robust, accurate and repeatable experimental data for oil mobilization process from 7 cm to one meter scale core samples. Data integrity of coreflow experiments are insured by two ways: repeating the experiments and reproducing the experimental results; improving the precesion and accuracy. Additionally, some of the coreflow experiments were carried out under CT scanner where the mobilization process of oil bank is visualized, monitored and characterized.

For experimental data Interpretation; we used analytical (JBN Method) and in house numerical simulator to produce accurate relative permeability curves for various core lengths. This experimental relative permeability interpretation provides us insight into the mechanisms and dynamics of the oil mobilization process in natural porous media.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801117
2018-06-11
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al SaadiF, WolfKH and KruijsdijkC.V.
    (2017) Characterization of Fontainebleau Sandstone: Quartz Overgrowth and its Impact on Pore-Throat Framework. J Pet Environ Biotechnol7: 328. doi: 10.4172/2157‑7463.1000328
    https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7463.1000328 [Google Scholar]
  2. Stegemeier, G. L
    (1977) “Mechanisms of Entrapment and Mobilization of Oil in Porous Media”, in Improved oil Recovery by Surfactant and Polymer Flooding, Shah, D. O. and Schechter, R. S. ed., Academic Press, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Johnson, E.F., BosslerD.P., and NaumannV.O
    , (1959), Calculation of Relative Permeability from Displacement Experiments, Transactions of the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers. Vol. 216, 370–372
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Vinegar, H.J., and Wellington, S.L.
    , (1987). Tomographic imaging of three-phase flow experiments. Review of Scientific Instruments58 (1), 96–107
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Avraam, D. G., and PayatakesA. C.
    , (1995). Generalized Relative Permeability Coefficients during Steady-State Two-Phase Flow in Porous Media, and Correlation with the Flow Mechanisms. Transport in Porous Media20: 135–168, 1995. 135
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801117
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801117
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error