A Hybrid Finite Difference Finite Element Approach for 3D Magnetotelluric Forward Modeling

References

1. Badea, E.A., Everett, M.E., Newman, G.A. and Biro, O.
   [2001] Finite-element analysis of controlled-source electromagnetic induction using Coulomb-gauged potentials:Geophysics, 66(3), 786–799.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Jin, J.
   [2014] Finite Element Method in Electromagnetics Third edition:Wiley-IEEE Press, Hoboken.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Jones, F.W. and Vozoff, K.
   [1978] The calculation of magnetotelluric quantities for three-dimensional conductivity inhomogeneities. Geophysics, 43(6), 1167–1175.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Kordy, M., Wannamaker, P., Maris, V., Cherkaev, E. and Hill, G.
   [2016] 3-D magnetotelluric inversion including topography using deformed hexahedral edge finite elements and direct solvers parallelized on SMP computers - Part I: forward problem and parameter Jacobians:Geophysical Journal International, 204, 74–93.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Long, J. and Farquharson, C.
   [2017] Three-dimensional controlled-source EM modeling with radial basis function-generated finite differences: A meshless approach:SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1209–1213.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Mackie, R.L., Smith, J.T. and MaddenT.R.
   [1994] Three-dimensional electromagnetic modeling using finite difference equations: The magnetotelluric example:Radio Science, 29, 923–935.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Mukherjee, S. and Everett, M.E.
   [2011] 3D controlled-source electromagnetic edge-based finite element modeling of conductive and permeable heterogeneities:Geophysics, 76(4), F215–F226.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Nam, M.J., KimH.J., SongY., Lee, T.J., Son, J. and Suh, J.H.
   [2007] 3D magnetotelluric modeling including surface topography:Geophysical Prospecting, 55, 277–287.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Sasaki, Y.
   [2001] Full 3-D inversion of electromagnetic data on PC:J. appl. Geophsicys., 46, 45–54.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Smith, J.T.
    [1996] Conservative modeling of 3-D electromagnetic fields, Part II: Biconjugate gradient solution and an accelerator:Geophysics, 61, 1319–1324.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Vachiratienchai, C., Boonchaisuk, S. and Siripunvaraporn, W.
    [2010] A hybrid finite difference-finite element method to incorporate topography for 2D direct current (DC) resistivity modeling:Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 183 (2010), 426–434.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Varentsov, I. M.
    [1983] Modern trends in the solution of forward and inverse 3D electromagnetic induction problems:Geophysics, 6(1), 55–78.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Varilsuha, D. and Candansayar, M.E.
    [2017] 3D Magnetotelluric Modeling by using Finite Difference Method: Comparison study of different forward modeling approaches:Geophysics, Advance online publication, doi: 10.1190/geo2017–0406.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017–0406.1 [Google Scholar]
14. Wannamaker, P. E., Hohmann, G. W. and Ward, S. H.
    [1984] Magnetotelluric responses of three-dimensional bodies in layered earths. Geophysics, 49(9), 1517–1533.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Wittke, J. and Tezkan, B. [2014] Meshfree magnetotelluric modelling:Geophysical Journal International, 198, 1255–1268.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Xiong, Z.
    [1992] Electromagnetic modeling of 3-D structures by the method of system iteration using integral equations:Geophysics, 57(12), 1556–1561.
    [Google Scholar]