1887

Abstract

Summary

Conventional anisotropic 3D CSEM inversion faces major challenges. The typically reconstructed ?h and ?v models often have conflicting depth structures that are difficult to explain in terms of subsurface geology. In integrated hydrocarbon exploration it is highly desirable to reduce ambiguity or subjectivity in depth interpretation of ?h and ?v models and also achieve comparability with other coincidentally-located subsurface models. Geological intuition suggests that the level and form of anisotropy would vary from one rock unit to another but a given 3D reservoir or anomalous rock mass would have the same boundary for ?h and ?v. This geological condition is met by incorporating an objective cross-gradient constraint in the formulation of the 3D anisotropic inverse problem implemented here in a nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm. Using CSEM data from a fold-thrust setting, we demonstrate that it yields models that have a common depth structure and hence reduced ambiguity in geological interpretation. The use of a priori information and structural constraints to resolve interpretational non-uniqueness differentiates our approach from the more conventional regularized 3D electromagnetic inversion approaches. The structural-coupling procedure described here can also be applied to the inversion of land CSEM survey data or other tensor property measurements.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801398
2018-06-11
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brown, V., Hoversten, M., Key, K., and Chen, J.S.
    [2012] Resolution of reservoir scale electrical anisotropy from marine CSEM data. Geophysics, 77, E147–E158.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Davydycheva, S. andFrenkel, M.A.
    [2013] The impact of 3D tilted resistivity anisotropy on marine CSEM measurements. The Leading Edge, 32, 1374–1381. Nov. 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gallardo, L.A. and Meju, M.A.
    [2004] Joint two-dimensional dc resistivity and seismic travel-time inversion with cross-gradients constraints. J. Geophys. Res., 109, B03311, doi:10.1029/2003JB0022717.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB0022717 [Google Scholar]
  4. Gribenko, A. and Zhdanov, M.S.
    [2014] Anisotropic inversion of MCSEM data based on the integral equation method. SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstract, pp.792–797, Denver 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Haber, E., McMillan, M. and Shekhtman, R.
    [2017] 3D anisotropic CSEM inversion. 79th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Paris, France, 12–15 June 2017. Paper Th P9 09.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Meju, M.A. and Fatah, A.
    [2017]. Structurally-constrained 3D anisotropic inversion of CSEM data using crossgradient criterion. 6th 3DEM International Symposium, Berkeley, Calif., USA, 28–30 March, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Newman, G. A., Commer, M. and Carazzone, J.J.
    [2010] Imaging CSEM data in the presence of electrical anisotropy. Geophysics75, 51–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Rodi, W. and Mackie, R.L.
    [2001] Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2-D magnetotelluric inversion. Geophysics66, 174–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Sasaki, Y.
    [2013] Anisotropic 3D inversion of marine CSEM data. 5th International Symposium on Three-Dimensional Electromagnetics, Sapporo, Japan, May 7–9, 2013, Expanded abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. [2011] Anisotropic, joint 3D inversion of marine CSEM and MT data. 81st SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 589–593.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Weiland, T.
    [1977] A discretization method for the solution of Maxwell’s equations for six component fields. Electronics and Communications AEÜ, 31, 116–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhdanov, M.S., Endo, M. Yoon, D., Cuma, M., Mattsson, J. and Midgley, J.
    [2014] Anisotropic 3D inversion of towed streamer electromagnetic data: Case study from the Troll West Oil Province. Interpretation, 2(3), p.SH01–SH17.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801398
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801398
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error