1887

Abstract

Summary

Most magnetotelluric (MT) data sets exhibit signs of galvanic distortion caused by near-surface resistivity structure, measured primarily in the electric field channels. While accurate resolution of detailed near-surface structure is out of scope, three-dimensional inversion typically accounts for this via inclusion of small anomalies around MT sites without affecting deeper structure resolution, as long as distortion is moderate. Direct inversion for distortion, which is mathematically represented by frequency-independent real-valued 2×2 matrices multiplying the undistorted impedances, reduces the structural impact from distorting structures in 3D inversion. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated with synthetic examples and on a real dataset. These also show that the recovery of the input distortion parameters depends significantly on the chosen model regularization controlling shallow model smoothness. Furthermore, a distortion term that is added to the objective function quantifies the estimates’ deviation from a neutral identity matrix via a multiplicative parameter. This turns out to be a useful means to control the overall absolute level of estimates in real data inversion. We conclude that inversion for galvanic distortion is a valuable tool in addressing observed distortion effects in MT data, but is no golden bullet to fully isolate it, which remains impossible without further information.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801399
2018-06-11
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Avdeeva, A., Moorkamp, M., Avdeev, D., Jegen, M., and Miensopust, M.
    [2015] Three dimensional inversion of magnetotelluric impedance tensor data and full distortion matrix. Geophysical Journal International, 202(1), 461–481.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Caldwell, T. G., Bibby, H. M., & Brown, C.
    [2004] The magnetotelluric phase tensor. Geophysical Journal International, 158(2), 457–469.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Groom, R.W. and Bailey, R.C.
    [1989] Decomposition of magnetotelluric impedance tensors in the presence of local three dimensional galvanic distortion. Journal of Geophysical Research, 94, 913–1925.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Li, X., Bai, D.H., and Yan, Y.L.
    [2016] Three-dimensional inversion of magnetotelluric resistivity model with galvanic distortion. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 59(6), 2302–2315.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mackie, R. and Watts, M.D.
    [2012] Detectability of 3-D sulphide targets with AFMAG. SEG 2012 Expanded Abstracts, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Soyer, W., Mackie, R., Hallinan, S. and Pavesi, A.
    [2017] Multi-physics imaging of the Darajat field. Geothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting, Transactions, 41, 1724–1741.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Soyer, W., Mackie, R. and Miorelli, F.
    [2017] 3D MT inversion considering galvanic distortion matrices. 13th China International Geo-Electromagnetic Workshop, Wuhan.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tietze, K., Ritter, O. and Egbert, G.D.
    [2015] 3-D joint inversion of the magnetotelluric phase tensor and vertical magnetic transfer functions. Geophysical Journal International, 203, 1128–1148.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801399
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801399
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error