1887

Abstract

Summary

Indonesia oil production is in the stage of mature fields dominant having a current oil recovery factor of 32% leaving underground about 48.6 billion barrels of unrecoverable oil in place ( ). At this stage, Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) is a mandatory choice to lift up the unrecoverable oil.

SKK Migas and Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB) conducted a study in 2015 to evaluate the EOR potential of 136 fields in Indonesia. EOR screening processes was firstly conducted using the combination of and & ) studies to determine the most suited EOR methods for each reservoir. Following the screening results is forecasting additional reserves for each reservoir applying the US Department of Energy (DOE) formula. Based on the additional reserves, we are seeking the best field candidates for CO2 EOR.

The CO2 EOR technology is a proven and mature technology. Through mapping the CO2 sources and the injected fields in Indonesia, several fields have been selected for pilot projects. The success of this CO2 EOR in Indonesia would mean the second life of national oil production. This paper shows one field project that is considered to be prospective.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801527
2018-06-11
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Taber, J.J., Martin, F.D., Seright, R.S
    [1997]. EOR Screening criteria revisited-Part 2: Applications and impact of oil prices. SPE Res Eng12 (3): 199–206. SPE 39234-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Muslim, A., Bae, W., Permadi, A.K., Suranto, Gunadi, B., Saputra, D.D., Widyaninngsih, R., Gunadi, T.A.
    [2013] Opportunities and Challenges of CO2 Flooding in Indonesia. SPE 165847
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Al Adasani, A. and Bai, B.
    [2011] Analysis of EOR Projects and Updated Screening Criteria. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 79 (2011), pp. 10–24. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2011.07.005.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2011.07.005 [Google Scholar]
  4. Taber, J. J., and Martin, F. D.
    [1983] Technical Screening Guides for the Enhanced Recovery of Oil. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Texas: SPE. SPE 12069
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Taber, J. J., Martin, F. D. and Seright, R. S.
    [1997a] EOR Screening Criteria Revisited–Part 1: Introduction to Screening Criteria and Enhanced Recovery Field Projects. SPE Reservoir Engineering Journal, Vol. 12 (1997), Issue 03, pp. 189–198.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy
    U.S. Department of Energy [1981]. Economics of Enhanced Oil Recovery–Final Report. Fossil Energy. Washington: Lewin and Associates, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Oil & Gas Journal
    Oil & Gas Journal [2014] http://www.ogj.com/content/dam/ogj/print-articles/volume-112/may-5/EOR-Table-C-Correction.pdf (accessed at January 12, 2018)
  8. SKK Migas
    SKK Migas [2016]. 2016 Annual Report.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Miller, Brandon, CP, Corlay
    , [1994], CO2 Huff & Puff Field Case: Five-Year Program Update. SPE 27677
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Haskin, Helen, Alston (Texaco)
    Haskin, Helen, Alston (Texaco) [1989] An Evaluation of CO2 Huff n Puff Tests in Texas. SPE 15502
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Uchiyama, Tadao, Fujita, Yusuke, Nishizaki, Aiko, Takagi, Sunao, Mitsuishi, Hiroshi, Kawahara, Yohei, Huy, Le, Phan Ngoc, Trung, N Huu, Trung, N Van, Toan, N Ngoc, Hoan
    , [2012], Design & Implementation of CO2 Huff-n-Puff Operation in a Vietnam Offshore, SPE 161835, Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, 11–14 November, Abu Dhabi, UAE
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801527
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801527
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error