1887

Abstract

Summary

When studying the deep structure of the southeastern part of the Fennoscandian shield, maps of the topography of the Moho surface were clarified. The depths of this surface on maps and sections of GSS profiles were compared. Discrepancies (up to 8 km) were taken into account in the construction of the consolidated map. To correct the position of this surface in the space between seismic profiles, an approach using the analysis of 3D distribution of density inhomogeneities in the earth’s crust and upper mantle.

The results of 3D density modeling for a two-layer model (earth’s crust-upper mantle) made it possible to determine the position of large blocks with different density in both of the layers.

2D inverse gravitatione problem solution in block model along the seismic profile of the Baltic sea under the assumption of lateral heterogeneity of the mantle made it possible to obtain more realistic densities for the lower crust of the Svekofennian folded area and for the upper crust of the Karelian block.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801776
2018-05-14
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Luosto, U.
    [1997]. Structure of Earth’s Crust in Fennoscandia as Revealed from Refraction and Wide- Angle Reflection Studies. Geophysica, 33(1), 3–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Sharov, N. V.
    [2015]. Deep seismic surveys in the southeastern part of the Fennoscandian shield. Geophysical journal. T. 37, № 5. 104–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. MarekGrad, TimoTiira
    and ESC Working Group. [2009]. The Moho depth map of the European Plate. Geophys. J. Int.176, 279–292
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Tsvetkova, T. A., Bugaenko, I. V., Zaiets, L. N.
    [2015]. The structure of the low-velocity regions in the mantle of Northern Europe. Proceedings Karelian research centre of RAS. № 7. 106–126
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Priezzhev, I. I.
    [2005]. Construction of the distributions of the physical parameters of the environment according to gravity, magnetic and seismic data. Geophysics. №. 3. 46–51.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801776
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801776
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error