1887

Abstract

Summary

Recent developments in permanent reservoir monitoring and well surveillance enable accurate, real-time downhole pressure measurements, providing enormous amount of data.

A number of previous studies had shown that integrating well test data into reservoir models improves significantly their predicting capability.

In our study, the iterative Ensemble Smoother was applied to condition permeability field to well test data. 1D and 2D synthetic reservoir models were used to investigate the method performance with respect to measurement error and localization which we consider important from practical point of view.

At first, we analyzed the influence of measurement error. Despite of high accuracy of the modern pressure gauges, the pressure data are often quite noisy. In practice, various filtering, denoising and smoothing techniques are employed in order to clarify the reservoir response and reduce data uncertainty. We evaluated several cases with different variance of measurement error. The comparison revealed that the pressure data noise has strong impact on the parameter estimation and the method convergence. In many cases, the noise caused the ensemble drifting away from the true solution.

Another important practical aspect is localization of model updates. During well test, pressure transients reflect pressure propagation away from the well. The propagation dynamic is governed by the formation properties within the disturbed reservoir domain. Therefore, the pressure measurements at a given time may be used for updating formation properties in the model only within the disturbed domain around the well. This would lead to the conclusion that a localization technique may be employed to relate model updates to relevant observations representing response from different reservoir areas. A time/distance dependent localization technique was tested to address this problem. The testing results showed that the proposed localization technique allowed for better estimation of permeability distribution (in terms of discrepancy with the true case). Validation by a blind test showed a better uncertainty propagation as the final ensemble retained significant diversity in areas remoted from test wells, in contrast to the non-localized case.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802133
2018-09-03
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Athichanagorn, S., Horne, R. N., & Kikani, J.
    [2002, October1] Processing and Interpretation of Long-Term Data Acquired From Permanent Pressure Gauges. Society of Petroleum Engineers. SPE Journal. doi:10.2118/80287‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/80287-PA [Google Scholar]
  2. Campozana, F. P., Lake, L. W., & Sepehrnoori, K.
    [1996] Reservoir Modeling Constrained to Multiple Well-Test Permeabilities. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/36569-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CampozanaF.P.
    [1997] Incorporating Dynamic Data into Geostatistical Reservoir Modelling, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, Y., Oliver, D.S.
    [2010] Cross-covariances and localization for EnKF in multiphase flow data assimilation, Computational Geosciences, 14(4):579–601
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, Y. and Oliver, D.S.
    [2013] Levenberg-Marquardt forms of the iterative ensemble smoother for efficient history matching and uncertainty quantification.Computational Geosciences17 (4):689–703
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Coutinho, E. J. R., Emerick, A. A., Li, G., & Reynolds, A. C.
    [2010]. Conditioning Multilayered Geologic Models to Well-Test and Production-Logging Data Using the Ensemble Kalman Filter. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/134542‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/134542-MS [Google Scholar]
  7. Deutsch, C.V.
    , [1992] Annealing Techniques Applied to Reservoir Modeling and the Integration of Geological and Engineering (Well Test) Data, Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kuchuk, F. J.
    [2009]. Radius of Investigation for Reserve Estimation From Pressure Transient Well Tests. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/120515‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/120515-MS [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, G., Han, M., Banerjee, R., & Reynolds, A. C.
    [2010]. Integration of Well-Test Pressure Data Into Heterogeneous Geological Reservoir Models.SPE Journal. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/124055‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/124055-PA [Google Scholar]
  10. Ludvigsen, B. E., & Le, H.
    [2015]. DST Matching and Interpretation through Numerical Well Testing on the Johan Sverdrup Field. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/175088‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/175088-MS [Google Scholar]
  11. Luo, X., Stordal, A. S., Lorentzen, R. J., Naevdal, G.
    [2015] Iterative Ensemble Smoother as an Approximate Solution to a Regularized Minimum-Average-Cost Problem: Theory and Applications.SPE Journal. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/176023‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/176023-PA [Google Scholar]
  12. Oliver, D. S.
    [1990]. The Averaging Process in Permeability Estimation From Well-Test Data.Society of Petroleum Engineers SPE Formation Evaluation. doi:10.2118/19845‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/19845-PA [Google Scholar]
  13. [1996]. Multiple Realizations of the Permeability Field From Well Test Data.SPE Journal. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/27970‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/27970-PA [Google Scholar]
  14. Oliver, D. S., He, N. and Reynolds, A. C.
    [1996] Conditioning Permeability Fields to Pressure Data, paper presented at the 5th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Leoben, Austria, 3–6 Sept. 1996, doi: 10.3997/2214‑4609.201406884
    https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201406884 [Google Scholar]
  15. Oliver, D., Reynolds, A., & Liu, N.
    (2008). Data. In Inverse Theory for Petroleum Reservoir Characterization and History Matching (pp. 112–126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511535642.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535642.007 [Google Scholar]
  16. Yadavalle, S. K., Roadifer, R. D., Jones, J. R., Yeh, N.-S
    [1994]. Use of Pressure Transient Data To Obtain Geostatistical Parameters for Reservoir Characterization. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/28432‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/28432-MS [Google Scholar]
  17. Yadavalli, S. K., Jones, J. R., Krase, L. D., Yeh, N.-S., & Roadifer, R. D.
    [1995]. Use of Pressure Transient Data to Estimate Permeability Variograms. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/30587‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/30587-MS [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802133
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802133
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error