1887

Abstract

Summary

We implement an ensemble based petrophysical parameter inversion framework to estimate static as well as dynamic reservoir/ petrophysical parameters such as saturations, pressure and / or porosity fields using seismic data. Here, we consider acoustic impedance (Ip) data as the seismic data. The suggested approach is solved as a Bayesian inversion problem where the prior is provided as an ensemble of pressure-saturation and porosity fields. Here, the realizations of porosity and permeability fields of the prior model are generated using geostatistical methods and are further used in a reservoir simulator to obtain the realizations of pressures-saturations fields at the time of the seismic acquisition. The pressure-saturations and porosities are then changed to account for the information available from acoustic impedances using an iterative ensemble smoother. The outcome is a new ensemble of pressure-saturation and porosity fields that honor the seismic data.

The new approach differs from conventional deterministic petrophysical parameter inversion algorithms using seismic data by being stochastic, and more importantly, it pays more attention to the uncertainty quantification. Our results show that the suggested ensemble-based method is suitable to handle the nonlinear inverse problem and has the capacity of providing quantification of the uncertainty of the result.

We apply the proposed framework to a field-like 3D synthetic reservoir model, based on a compacting field scenario. The reservoir model consists of three fluid phases (water, oil and gas), and exhibits production related compaction. The numerical results from study indicates that the proposed framework can integrate the reservoir-engineering data as prior knowledge with the seismic data, achieving reasonable estimates of both the static and dynamic reservoir parameters.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802143
2018-09-03
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aanonsen, S., Nævdal, G., Oliver, D., Reynolds, A. and Vallès, B.
    [2009] The Ensemble Kalman Filter in Reservoir Engineering: a Review.SPE Journal, 14, 393–412. SPE-117274-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Abadpour, A., Bergey, P. and Piasecki, R.
    [2013] 4D Seismic History Matching With Ensemble Kalman Filter-Assimilation on Hausdorff Distance to Saturation Front. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers. SPE-163635-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhakta, T.
    [2015] Better estimation of pressure-saturation changes from time-lapse PP-AVO data by using non-linear optimization method. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2015, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 5456–5460.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. [2018] Improvement of pressure-saturation changes estimations from time-lapse PP-AVO data by using non-linear optimization method.Journal of Applied Geophysics, 155, 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhakta, T. and Landrø, M.
    [2013] Discrimination between pressure-saturation changes in compacting reservoirs using time-lapse amplitudes and travel time. In: 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. [2014] Estimation of pressure-saturation changes for unconsolidated reservoir rocks with high VP/VS ratio. Geophysics, 79(5), M35–M54.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhakta, T., Luo, X., Lorentzen, R. and Nævdal, G.
    [2017a] Estimation of pressure-saturation and porosity fields from seismic acoustic impedance data using an ensemble-based method. In: 2017 SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting.Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bhakta, T., Luo, X. and Nævdal, G.
    [2016] Ensemble based 4D seismic history matching using a sparse representation of AVA data. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2016, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2961–2966.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. [2017b] Estimation of Pressure-Saturation and Porosity Fields from Seismic AVA Data Using an Ensemble Based Method. In: IOR 2017–19th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bosch, M., Mukerji, T. and Gonzalez, E.F.
    [2010] Seismic inversion for reservoir properties combining statistical rock physics and geostatistics: A review.Geophysics, 75(5), 75A165–75A176.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Buland, A. and El Ouair, Y.
    [2006] Bayesian time-lapse inversion. Geophysics, 71(3), R43–R48.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Buland, A., Kolbjørnsen, O., Hauge, R., Skjæveland, Ø. and Duffaut, K.
    [2008] Bayesian lithology and fluid prediction from seismic prestack data. Geophysics, 73(3), C13–C21.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Buland, A. and Omre, H.
    [2003] Bayesian linearized AVO inversion.Geophysics, 68, 185–198.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, Y. and Oliver, D.
    [2013] Levenberg-Marquardt forms of the iterative ensemble smoother for efficient history matching and uncertainty quantification.Computational Geosciences, 17, 689–703.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, Y. and Oliver, D.S.
    [2012] Ensemble randomized maximum likelihood method as an iterative ensemble smoother.Mathematical Geosciences, 44, 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dadashpour, M., Ciaurri, D.E., Mukerji, T., Kleppe, J. and Landrø, M.
    [2010] A derivative-free approach for the estimation of porosity and permeability using time-lapse seismic and production data.Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 7(4), 351.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dadashpour, M., Landrø, M. and Kleppe, J.
    [2008] Nonlinear inversion for estimating reservoir parameters from time-lapse seismic data.Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 5, 54.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Das, A., Roy, B., Folstad, P.G., Lyngnes, B., Smith, B. and Grandi, A.
    [2013a] Dynamic Rock Physics Modeling for Compacting Chalk Reservoirs. In: 2013 SEG Annual Meeting.Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Das, A., Roy, B., Folstad, P.G., Lyngnes, B., Smith, B. and Grandic, A.
    [2013b] A rock physics modelling workflow for compacting chalk reservoirs: Ekofisk Case study. In: Second International Workshop on Rock Physics.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Doyen, P.M.
    [2007] Seismic reservoir characterization: An earth modelling perspective.EAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Emerick, A.A.
    [2014] Estimation of pressure and saturation fields from time-lapse impedance data using the ensemble smoother.Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 11(3), 035007.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Emerick, A.A. and Reynolds, A.C.
    [2012a] Ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation.Computers & Geosciences, 55, 3–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. [2012b] History matching time-lapse seismic data using the ensemble Kalman filter with multiple data assimilations.Computational Geosciences, 16, 639–659.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. [2013] History-matching production and seismic data in a real field case using the ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers. SPE-163675-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Engl, H.W., Hanke, M. and Neubauer, A.
    [2000] Regularization of Inverse Problems.Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Evensen, G.
    [2009] Data assimilation: the ensemble Kalman filter.Springer Science & Business Media.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fahimuddin, A., Aanonsen, S. and Skjervheim, J.A.
    [2010] Ensemble Based 4D Seismic History Matching–Integration of Different Levels and Types of Seismic Data. In: 72nd EAGE Conference & Exhibition.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Furrer, R. and Bengtsson, T.
    [2007] Estimation of high-dimensional prior and posterior covariance matrices in Kalman filter variants.Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 98(2), 227–255.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gassmann, F.
    [1951] Über die Elastizität poröser Medien.Vierteljahresschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 96, 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Grana, D.
    [2013] Bayesian inversion methods for seismic reservoir characterization and time-lapse studies. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. [2016] Bayesian linearized rock-physics inversion. Geophysics, 81(6), D625–D641.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Grana, D. and Mukerji, T.
    [2015] Bayesian inversion of time-lapse seismic data for the estimation of static reservoir properties and dynamic property changes. Geophysical Prospecting, 63(3), 637–655.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Gu, Y. and Oliver, D.
    [2007] An iterative ensemble Kalman filter for multiphase fluid flow data assimilation.SPE Journal, 12, 438–446. SPE-108438-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Gunning, J. and Glinsky, M.E.
    [2007] Detection of reservoir quality using Bayesian seismic inversion. Geophysics, 72(3), R37–R49.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Jensen, E.H., Johansen, T.A., Avseth, P. and Bredesen, K.
    [2016] Quantitative interpretation using inverse rock-physics modeling on AVO data. The Leading Edge, 35(8), 677–683.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Katterbauer, K., Hoteit, I. and Sun, S.
    [2015] History Matching of Electromagnetically Heated Reservoirs Incorporating Full-Wavefield Seismic and Electromagnetic imaging.SPE Journal, 20, 923–941. SPE-173896-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Landrø, M.
    [2001] Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation changes from time-lapse seismic data.Geophysics, 66, 836–844.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Larsen, A.L., Ulvmoen, M., Omre, H. and Buland, A.
    [2006] Bayesian lithology/fluid prediction and simulation on the basis of a Markov-chain prior model. Geophysics, 71(5), R69–R78.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Leeuwenburgh, O. and Arts, R.
    [2014] Distance parameterization for efficient seismic history matching with the ensemble Kalman Filter.Computational Geosciences, 18, 535–548.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Li, G. and Reynolds, A.
    [2009] Iterative Ensemble Kalman Filters for Data Assimilation.SPE Journal, 14, 496–505. SPE-109808-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu, M. and Grana, D.
    [2018] Stochastic nonlinear inversion of seismic data for the estimation of petroelastic properties using the Ensemble Smoother and data re-parameterization. Geophysics, 83(3), 1–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Luo, X., Bhakta, T., Jakobsen, M. and Nævdal, G.
    [2016a] An ensemble 4D seismic history matching framework with sparse representation based on wavelet multiresolution analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.04577.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. [2016b] An Ensemble 4D Seismic History Matching Framework with Wavelet Multiresolution Analysis-A 3D Benchmark Case Study.ECMOR XV-15th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. [2017a] An Ensemble 4D-Seismic History-Matching Framework With Sparse Representation Based On Wavelet Multiresolution Analysis. SPE Journal, 22(23), 985–1010.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Luo, X., Bhakta, T. and Nævdal, G.
    [2017b] Data Driven Adaptive Localization With Applications To Ensemble-Based 4D Seismic History Matching.SPE Bergen One Day Seminar, Bergen, Norway, April 5. SPE-185936-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. [2018] Correlation-Based Adaptive Localization With Applications To Ensemble-Based 4D Seismic History Matching. Preprint. SPE-185936-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Luo, X., Stordal, A., Lorentzen, R. and Nævdal, G.
    [2015] Iterative ensemble smoother as an approximate solution to a regularized minimum-average-cost problem: theory and applications.SPE Journal, 20, 962–982. SPE-176023-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Mallick, S.
    [1995] Model-based inversion of amplitude-variations-with-offset data using a genetic algorithm. Geophysics, 60(4), 939–954.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Mindlin, R.D.
    [1949] Compliance of elastic bodies in contact.Journal of Applied Mechanics, 16, 259–268.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Mosegaard, K. and Tarantola, A.
    [1995] Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 100(B7), 12431–12447.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Nævdal, G., Johnsen, L.M., Aanonsen, S.I. and Vefring, E.H.
    [2005] Reservoir monitoring and continuous model updating using ensemble Kalman filter.SPE Journal, 10, 66–74. SPE-84372-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Nur, A.M., Mavko, G., Dvorkin, J. and Gal, D.
    [1995] Critical porosity: The key to relating physical properties to porosity in rocks. In: 1995 SEG Annual Meeting.Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Rimstad, K., Avseth, P. and Omre, H.
    [2012] Hierarchical Bayesian lithology/fluid prediction: A North Sea case study. Geophysics, 77(2), B69–B85.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Sen, M.K. and Stoffa, P.L.
    [1991] Nonlinear one-dimensional seismic waveform inversion using simu-lated annealing. Geophysics, 56(10), 1624–1638.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. [1996] Bayesian inference, Gibbs’ sampler and uncertainty estimation in geophysical inversion. Geophysical Prospecting, 44(2), 313–350.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. [2013] Global optimization methods in geophysical inversion.Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Skjervheim, J.A. and Evensen, G.
    [2011] An ensemble smoother for assisted history matching. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium.The Woodlands, Texas, USA. SPE-141929-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Skjervheim, J.A., Evensen, G., Aanonsen, S.I., Ruud, B.O. and Johansen, T.A.
    [2007] Incorporating 4D seismic data in reservoir simulation models using ensemble Kalman filter.SPE Journal, 12, 282–292. SPE-95789-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Tarantola, A.
    [2005] Inverse Problem Theoryand Methods for Model Parameter Estimation.SIAM.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Trani, M., Arts, R. and Leeuwenburgh, O.
    [2012] Seismic history matching of fluid fronts using the ensemble Kalman filter.SPE Journal, 18, 159–171. SPE-163043-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Ulvmoen, M. and Omre, H.
    [2010] Improved resolution in Bayesian lithology/fluid inversion from prestack seismic data and well observations: Part 1?Methodology. Geophysics, 75(2), R21–R35.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Van Leeuwen, P.J. and Evensen, G.
    [1996] Data assimilation and inverse methods in terms of a probabilistic formulation.Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 2898–2913.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802143
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802143
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error