1887

Abstract

Summary

Learning from data has been a rich topic of research in many engineering disciplines. In particular, in reservoir engineering, data-driven methodologies have been applied successfully to infer interwell connections and flow patterns in the subsurface and in assisting field development plans, including, history matching and performance prediction phases, of conventional and unconventional reservoirs. Although real-time data acquisition and analysis are becoming routine in many workflows, there is still a disconnect with the traditional theoretical first laws principles, whereby conservation laws and phenomenological behavior are used to derive the underlying spatio-temporal evolution equations.

In this work, we propose to combine sparsity promoting methods and machine learning techniques to find the governing equation from the spatio-temporal data series from a reservoir simulator. The idea is to connect data with the physical interpretation of the dynamical system. We achieve this by identifying the nonlinear ODE system equations of our discretized reservoir system. The solution is assumed sparse because we know there is only few terms are relevant for each governing equation. The sparse structure is invoked by two methods: sparse regression with hard threshold (SINDy) and sparse regression with soft threshold (LASSO). For each method to work properly without overfitting, unique ways have been developed for seeking a balance between accuracy and complexity of the model with either l1 or l2 norm penalty. In addition, the sparsity structure can be further fixed with the physical fact that flow term is only related with its adjacent cells.

We apply the method to a two-dimensional single phase flow system. First, the time series data is generated from the simulator with recording points equally spread in space. Then a large library is built containing possible linear, nonlinear terms of the governing ODE equation and finally the combination of the terms is identified through a coefficient vector for each equation. Difference in each technique and detailed modification to the threshold tolerance and penalty factor will be discussed and compared. Extensions to the two-phase flow case is also underway and promising initial results will also be shown in this paper. The validation process is achieved by comparing the original single/two phase simulator results and the results solved from the identified ODE system by Newton iteration.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802180
2018-09-03
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akaike, H.
    (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle,[w:] proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on information, bn petrow, f.Czaki, Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bao, A., & Gildin, E.
    (2017). Data-Driven Model Reduction Based on Sparsity-Promoting Methods for Multiphase Flow in Porous Media. In SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference.Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Candes, E. J., Romberg, J. K., & Tao, T.
    (2006). Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements.Communications on pure and applied mathematics, 59(8), 1207–1223.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, B., He, J., Wen, X. H., Chen, W., & Reynolds, A. C.
    [2017]. Uncertainty quantification and value of information assessment using proxies and Markov chain Monte Carlo method for a pilot project.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 157, 328–339.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, B., Harp, D.R. Lin, Y., Keating, E.H., and Pawar, R.J.
    [2018] Geologic CO2 Sequestration Monitoring Design: A Machine Learning and Uncertainty Quantification Based Approach. Applied Energy, 225, 332–345.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Christopher, M. B.
    (2016). PATTERN RECOGNITION AND MACHINE LEARNING.Springer-VerlagNew York.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ghasemi, M., & Gildin, E.
    (2016). Model order reduction in porous media flow simulation using quadratic bilinear formulation.Computational Geosciences, 20(3), 723–735.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ghasemi, M., Ibrahim, A., & Gildin, E.
    (2014). Reduced order modeling in reservoir simulation using the bilinear approximation techniques. In SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference.Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Wainwright, M.
    (2015). Statistical learning with sparsity: the lasso and generalizations.CRC press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hasting, W
    [1970] Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov Chains and their applications. Biometrika57 (1), 97–109
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jovanović, Mihailo R., Peter J.Schmid, and Joseph W.Nichols
    . Sparsity-Promoting Dynamic Mode Decomposition. Physics of Fluids (1994-Present) 26.2 (2014): 024103.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Koza, J. R.
    (1992). Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection (Vol. 1). MIT press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kutz, J. N., Brunton, S. L., Brunton, B. W., & Proctor, J. L.
    (2016). Dynamic mode decomposition: data-driven modeling of complex systems (Vol. 149). SIAM.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Loiseau, J., & Brunton, S.
    (2018). Constrained sparse Galerkin regression.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 838, 42–67. doi:10.1017/jfm.2017.823
    https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.823 [Google Scholar]
  15. Mangan, N. M., Brunton, S. L., Proctor, J. L., & Kutz, J. N.
    (2016). Inferring biological networks by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics.IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications, 2(1), 52–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Rudy, S. H., Brunton, S. L., Proctor, J. L., & Kutz, J. N.
    (2017). Data-driven discovery of partial differential equations.Science Advances, 3(4), e1602614.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Schmidt, M., & Lipson, H.
    (2009). Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data.science, 324(5923), 81–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Schwarz, G.
    (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model.The annals of statistics, 6(2), 461–464.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Sorek, N., Zalavadia, H.,& Gildin, E.
    (2017). Model Order Reduction and Control Polynomial Approximation for Well-Control Production Optimization. In SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference.Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Stephen Boyd, Neal Parikh, EricChu, BorjaPeleato and JonathanEckstein
    (2011), “Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers”, Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning: 3(1), pp 1–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/2200000016
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ljung, L.
    (1987). System Identification – Theory for the User.Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Soderstrom, T. and Stoica, P.
    (1989). System Identification.Prentice-hall Int.London
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jan-DirkJansen
    (2013). A Systems Description of Flow Through Porous Media.Springer. Springer International Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Heijn, T., Markovinovic, R., & Jansen, J.-D.
    (2004, June 1). Generation of Low-Order Reservoir Models Using System-Theoretical Concepts. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/88361‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/88361-PA [Google Scholar]
  25. Gildin, E. and Wheeler, M.F.
    (2008). Control of Subsurface Flow using Model Predictive Control Techniques. In Proceedings of the EngOpt 2008 - International Conference on Engineering Optimization. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 01 - 05 June 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Shahab D.Mohaghegh
    (2017). Data-Driven Reservoir Modeling.166 pp.; Softcover Textbook. ISBN: 978-1-61399-560-0. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. SrikantaMishra and AkhilDatta-Gupta
    (2017). Applied Statistical Modeling and Data Analytics: A Practical Guide for the Petroleum Geosciences. 1st Edition. ISBN: 9780128032794. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ghommem, M., Gildin, E., & Ghasemi, M.
    (2016, February 1). Complexity Reduction of Multiphase Flows in Heterogeneous Porous Media. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/167295‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/167295-PA [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802180
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802180
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error