1887

Abstract

Summary

Petro-elastic modeling plays a crucial role in closing the loop between the reservoir model and seismic data by means of relating elastic properties to the reservoir model properties. Accordingly, precise estimation of elastic parameters leads to a more reliable petro-elastic model and helps to reduce uncertainties related to reservoir model construction. One of the pitfalls in petro-elastic modeling is the values of mineral elastic properties, which are conventionally considered constant for most of the reservoirs. Disregarding the lithological characteristics may increase uncertainty in the estimation of parameters and can be misleading especially in 4D studies on saturation effects. Carbonate rocks as the most predominant rocks in the reservoirs show a more complex behavior in comparison to sandstone reservoirs; hence, the effects of physical properties such as aspect ratio and critical porosity should be considered with more care. In this paper, solving the multivariate optimization problem is addressed via very fast simulated annealing algorithm. The optimum values of elastic moduli are determined considering two rock physics models, Nurs’ critical porosity, and the simplified Xu-White model. Depending on dry rock physics relation, the correspondent physical parameter (critical porosity or aspect ratio) is optimised as well. The case study is a carbonate reservoir located in the southwest of Iran. The variation of lithological characteristics with depth for each rock type necessitates constraining the physical parameters of each rock physics model to lithology during the optimization workflow. The output of the optimization workflow is The output of the workflow is the optimised elastic moduli of the mineral components and the regression coefficient of the fitting parameters to effective porosity. In addition, the optimised fitting parameters provide some insights into pores shape and diagenesis processes of the rock in the target zone. Comparison of the modeled and observed elastic logs confirms the accuracy of the proposed workflow.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802195
2018-09-03
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amini, H.
    , [2018a] Calibration of mineral and dry rock elastic moduli in sand-shale mixtures.80th EAGE conference, extended abstract.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , [2018b] Comparison of Xu-White, Simplified Xu-White (Keys & Xu) and Nur’s critical porosity in shaley sands.80th EAGE conference, extended abstract.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Avseth, P., Mukerji, T., Mavko, G. and Dvorkin, J.
    [2010] Rock-physics diagnostics of depositional texture, diagenetic alteration and reservoir heterogeneity in high porosity siliciclastic sediments and rocks – a review of selected models and suggested workflows.Geophysics, 75(5), 75A31–75A47.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Batzle, M. and Wang, Z.
    [1992] Seismic properties of pore fluids,. Geophysics, 57(11), 1396–1408.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ingber, L.
    [1993] Simulated annealing: practice versus theory.Statistics and computing, in press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. [1989] Very fast simulated reannealing. Mathematical and computer modeling, 12(8), 967–973.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Keys, R. G. and Xu, S.
    [2001] An approximation for the Xu-White velocity model. Geophysics, 67(5), 1406–1414.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T. and Dvorkin, J.
    [2009] The rock physics handbook:Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Nur, A.M., Mavko, G., Dvorkin, J. and Gal, D.
    [1995]. Critical porosity: The key to relating physical properties to porosity in rocks. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstract. 878–881.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Sayers, C. M.
    [2008] The elastic properties of carbonates, The /eading edge, 27(8), 1020–1024.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sen, M. and Stoffa, P. L.
    [1995] Global optimization methods in geophysical inversion, Elsevier press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Sen. M. Stoffa, P.L
    . [1991] Non-linear one-dimensional seismic waveform inversion using simulated annealing. Geophysics, 56(10), 1624–1638.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Xu, S. and Payne, A.
    [2009] Modeling elastic properties in carbonate rocks. The Leading Edge, 28(1), 66–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Xu, S. and White, E.
    [1995] A new velocity model for sale-sand mixtures.The Geophysical Prospecting, 43, 91–118.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802195
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802195
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error