1887

Abstract

Summary

The application of chemical method for hydrocarbons extraction has attracted increasing interest in the reservoir simulation community. To simulate such reactive transfer processes, compositional flows in porous media with a complex mineralogical must be coupled with the chemical equilibria in the aqueous phase and the precipitation / dissolution reactions of the minerals.

The most important time consumed during reactive transport simulation is the geochemical equilibrium (about 30% to 80%). Typically, chemical equilibria are computed for each cell at each time-step by solving an equations system with the iterative Newton-Raphson method. To reduce the computation time, the number of species in solution is often reduce. However, such assumption leads to a less of accuracy of results.

Instead of simplifying the geochemical model, an approach that mimic the resolution of geochemical equilibrium can be considered. The aim of the approach is to provide a substitute method to bypass the huge consuming time required to balance the chemical system. This paper focuses on the use of artificial neural networks (ANN) to replace the geochemical equilibrium package. It is widely admitted that ANN are the most efficient response surface model due to the no linear behavior of the output again the parameters.

This paper presents a complete workflow for compositional reservoir simulation using an artificial neural network to determine the chemical equilibrium instead of solving equations system. This approach substantially reduces the computation time while keeping an accurate equilibrium calculation.

To illustrate the proposed workflow, a case study of CO2 storage in geological formation is presented. The compositional system involves 11 aqueous species, 1 mineral component, 6 chemical equilibrium reactions and 1 mineral dissolution/precipitation reaction.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802232
2018-09-03
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bruyelle, J., Guérillot, D.
    [2014] Neural networks and their derivatives for history matching and reservoir optimization problems. Computational Geosciences, 18(3–4), 549–561.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Christie, M. A., Blunt, M. J.
    [2001] Tenth SPE Comparative Solution Project: A Comparison of Upscaling Techniques. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE 66599).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Guérillot, D.
    [2011] Procédé et système de modélisation dynamique d’un écoulement de fluide polyphasique, French Patent EP 2791712 A1 (Source du texte : WO2013087846A1)
    [Google Scholar]
  4. [2014] Method and system for dynamically modeling a multiphase fluid flow - US Patent App. 14/365,053, 2014
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lichtner, P. C.
    [1985] Continuum model for simultaneous chemical reactions and mass transport in hydrothermal systems. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 49(3), 779–800.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lichtner, P.C.
    [1996] Continuum formulation of multicomponent–multiphase reactive transport. Reactive Transport in Porous Media, Reviews in Mineralogy, vol. 34, 1996, pp. 1 – 81.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Marle, C.M.
    [1982] On macroscopic equations governing multiphase flow with diffusion and chemical reactions in porous media. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 20(5), 643–662.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Nghiem, L., Sammon, P., Grabenstetter, J., Ohkuma, H.
    [2004] Modeling CO2 storage in aquifers with a fully-coupled geochemical EOS compositional simulator. In SPE/DOE symposium on improved oil recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E. Williams, R. J.
    [1986] Learning Internal Representations by Error Backpropagation, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, p. 318–362, MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Steefel, C.I., MacQuarrieK.T.B.
    [1996] Approaches to modeling reactive transport in porous media. Reactive Transport in Porous Media, Reviews in Mineralogy, vol. 34, 1996, pp. 83 – 125
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Steefel, C.I., Appelo, C.A.J., Arora, B., Jacques, D., Kalbacher, T., Kolditz, O., Lagneau, V., Lichtner, P.C., Mayer, K.U., Meeussen, J.C.L., Molins, S., Moulton, D., Shao, H., Šrmůnek, J., Spycher, N., Yabusaki, S.B., Yeh, G.T.
    [2015]. Reactive transport codes for subsurface environmental simulation. Comput. Geosci. 19, 445–478.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Steefel, C.I., MolinsS.
    [2016] CrunchFlow, Software for Modeling Multicomponent Reactive Flow and Transport, USER’S MANUAL, 2016
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Strang, G.
    [1968] On the construction and comparison of difference schemes. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 5(3), 506–517.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Werbos, P. J.
    [1974] Beyond Regression: New Tools for Prediction and Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences, Ph. D. thesis, Harvard University.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Yeh, G. T., Tripathi, V. S.
    [1989] A critical evaluation of recent developments in hydrogeochemical transport models of reactive multichemical components. Water resources research, 25(1), 93–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. [1991] A model for simulating transport of reactive multispecies components: model development and demonstration. Water Resources Research, 27(12), 3075–3094.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Yeh, G. T., SunJ., JardineP., BurgosW.D., FangY., Li, M.-H., Chunli, Siegel M.D.
    [2004] HYDROGEOCHEM 5.0: A Three-Dimensional Model of Coupled Fluid Flow, Thermal Transport, and HYDROGEOCHEMical Transport through Variably Saturated Conditions - Version 5.0
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802232
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802232
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error