1887

Abstract

Summary

A number of different multiscale methods have been developed as a robust alternative to upscaling and as a means for accelerated reservoir simulation of high-resolution geomodels. In their basic setup, multiscale methods use a restriction operator to construct a reduced system of flow equations on a coarser grid, and a prolongation operator to map pressure unknowns from the coarse grid back to the original simulation grid. The prolongation operator consists of basis functions computed numerically by solving localized flow problems. The resulting multiscale solver can both be used as a CPR-preconditioner in fully implicit simulators or as an efficient approximate iterative linear solver in a sequential setting; successful implementation of the latter approach in a commercial simulator was reported at ECMOR XV. Recently, it has been shown that significantly faster convergence is observed if one instead of using a single pair of prolongation-restriction operators, applies a sequence of such operators, where some of the operators are adapted to faults, fractures, facies, or other geobodies. Herein, we present how the convergence can be accelerated even further, if we also include additional basis functions that capture local changes in the pressure.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802251
2018-09-03
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aarnes, J.E., Krogstad, S. and Lie, K.A.
    [2006] A Hierarchical Multiscale Method for Two-Phase Flow Based upon Mixed Finite Elements and Nonuniform Coarse Grids.Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 5(2), 337–363.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bank, R.E., Chan, T.F., Coughran, W.M. and Smith, R.K.
    [1989] The alternate-block-factorization procedure for systems of partial differential equations.BIT Numerical Mathematics, 29(4), 938–954.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bao, K., Lie, K.A., Møyner, O. and Liu, M.
    [2017] Fully implicit simulation of polymer flooding with MRST.Comput. Geosci., 21(5), 1219–1244.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bell, J.B., Trangenstein, J.A. and Shubin, G.R.
    [1986] Conservation laws of mixed type describing three-phase flow in porous media.SIAM J. Appl. Math., 46(6), 1000–1017.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Christie, M.A. and Blunt, M.J.
    [2001] Tenth SPE comparative solution project: a comparison of upscaling techniques.SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng., 4, 308–317.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Coats, K.H.
    [2000] A Note on IMPES and Some IMPES-Based Simulation Models.SPE J., 5, 14–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cusini, M., Lukyanov, A.A., Natvig, J.R. and Hajibeygi, H.
    [2015] Constrained pressure residual multiscale (CPR-MS) method for fully implicit simulation of multiphase flow in porous media.J. Comput. Phys., 299, 472–486.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Efendiev, Y. and Hou, T.Y.
    , [2009] Multiscale Finite Element Methods, Surveys and Tutorials in the Applied Mathematical Sciences, 4. Springer Verlag, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GeoQuest, Schlumberger
    , [2010] ECLIPSE reservoir simulator, Manual and technical description.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gries, S., Stüben, K., Brown, G.L., Chen, D. and Collins, D.A.
    [2014] Preconditioning for efficiently applying algebraic multigrid in fully implicit reservoir simulations.SPE J., 19(04), 726–736.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hajibeygi, H., Bonfigli, G., Hesse, M.A. and Jenny, P.
    [2008] Iterative multiscale finite-volume method.Journal of Computational Physics, 227(19), 8604–8621.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hauge, V.L.
    , [2010] Multiscale Methods and Flow-based Gridding for Flow and Transport in Porous Media. Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hauge, V.L., Lie, K.A. and Natvig, J.R.
    [2012] Flow-based coarsening for multiscale simulation of transport in porous media.Computational Geosciences, 16(2), 391–408.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hou, T.Y. and Wu, X.H.
    [1997] A Multiscale Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems in Composite Materials and Porous Media.Journal of Computational Physics, 134(1), 169–189.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jenny, P., Lee, S.H. and Tchelepi, H.A.
    [2003] Multi-scale finite-volume method for elliptic problems in subsurface flow simulation.Journal of Computational Physics, 187(1), 47–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. [2006] Adaptive fully implicit multi-scale finite-volume method for multiphase flow and transport in heterogeneous porous media.J. Comput. Phys., 217(2), 627–641.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Karypis, G. and Kumar, V.
    [1998] A Fast and High Quality Multilevel Scheme for Partitioning Irregular Graphs.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 20(1), 359–392.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kozlova, A., Li, Z., Natvig, J.R., Watanabe, S., Zhou, Y., Bratvedt, K. and Lee, S.H.
    [2016a] A real-field multiscale black-oil reservoir simulator.SPE J., 21(6).
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kozlova, A., Walsh, D., Chittireddy, S., Li, Z., Natvig, J., Watanabe, S. and Bratvedt, K.
    [2016b] A hybrid approach to parallel multiscale reservoir simulator. In: ECMOR XV – 15th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery.EAGE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Krogstad, S., Lie, K.A., Møyner, O., Nilsen, H.M., Raynaud, X. and Skaflestad, B.
    [2015] MRST-AD – an open-source framework for rapid prototyping and evaluation of reservoir simulation problems. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lacroix, S., Vassilevski, Y., Wheeler, J. and Wheeler, M.
    [2003] Iterative Solution Methods for Modeling Multiphase Flow in Porous Media Fully Implicitly.SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 25(3), 905–926.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lacroix, S., Vassilevski, Y.V. and Wheeler, M.F.
    [2000] Iterative Solvers of the Implicit Parallel Accurate Reservoir Simulator (IPARS), I: Single Processor Case. Tech. rep., Numer. Linear Algebra Appl.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lie, K.A.
    , [2016] An Introduction to Reservoir Simulation Using MATLAB: User guide for the Matlab Reservoir Simulation Toolbox (MRST).SINTEF Digital, Department of Applied Mathematics.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lie, K.A., Kedia, K., Skaflestad, B., Wang, X., Yang, Y., Wu, X.H. and Hoda, N.
    [2017a] A General Non-Uniform Coarsening and Upscaling Framework for Reduced-Order Modeling. In: of Petroleum Engineers, S. (Ed.) SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lie, K.A., Møyner, O. and Natvig, J.R.
    [2017b] A Feature-Enriched Multiscale Method for Simulating Complex Geomodels.SPE J., 22(06), 1929–1945.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lie, K.-A. and Møyner, O., Natvig, J.R., Kozlova, A., Bratvedt, K., Watanabe, S. and Li, Z.
    [2017c] Successful application of multiscale methods in areal reservoir simulator environment.Comput. Geosci., 21(5), 981–998.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Manzocchi, T., Carter, J.N., Skorstad, A., Fjellvoll, B., Stephen, K.D., Howell, J.A., Matthews, J.D., Walsh, J.J., Nepveu, M., Bos, C., Cole, J., Egberts, P., Flint, S., Hern, C., Holden, L., Hovland, H., Jackson, H., Kolbjørnsen, O., MacDonald, A., Nell, P.A.R., Onyeagoro, K., Strand, J., Syversveen, A.R., Tchistiakov, A., Yang, C., Yielding, G. and Zimmerman, R.W.
    [2008] Sensitivity of the impact of geological uncertainty on production from faulted and unfaulted shallow-marine oil reservoirs: objectives and methods.Petroleum Geoscience, 14(1), 3–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Møyner, O. and Lie, K.A.
    [2016a] A multiscale restriction-smoothed basis method for compressible black-oil models.SPE J., 21(6), 2079–2096.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. [2016b] A multiscale restriction-smoothed basis method for high contrast porous media represented on unstructured grids.J.Comput. Phy., 304, 46–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Møyner, O. and Moncorgé, A.
    [2018] Nonlinear Domain Decomposition Scheme for Sequential Fully Implicit Formulation of Compositional Multiphase Flow. In: ECMOR XVI – 16th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery.EAGE, Barcelona, Spain.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Møyner, O. and Tchelepi, H.A.
    [2018] A Mass-Conservative Sequential Implicit Multiscale Method for General Compositional Problems.SPE J. To appear.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Odeh, A.S.
    [1981] Comparison of Solutions to a Three-Dimensional Black-Oil Reservoir Simulation Problem.J. Petrol. Techn., 33(1), 13–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Saad, Y. and Schultz, M.H.
    [1986] GMRES: A Generalized Minimal Residual Algorithm for Solving Nonsymmetric Linear Systems.SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., 7(3), 856–869.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Stüben, K., Clees, T., Klie, H., Lu, B. and Wheeler, M.F.
    [2007] Algebraic Multigrid Methods (AMG) for the Efficient Solution of Fully Implicit Formulations in Reservoir Simulation. In: of Petroleum Engineers, S. (Ed.) SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Todd, M.R. and Longstaff, W.J.
    [1972] The development, testing, and application of a numerical simulator for predicting miscible flood performance.J. Petrol. Tech., 24(7), 874–882.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Trangenstein, J.A. and Bell, J.B.
    [1989] Mathematical structure of the black-oil model for petroleum reservoir simulation.SIAM J. Appl. Math., 49(3), 749–783.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Trottenberg, U., Oosterlee, C.W. and Schuller, A.
    , [2000] Multigrid.Academic press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wallis, J.R.
    [1983] Incomplete Gaussian elimination as a preconditioning for generalized conjugate gradient acceleration. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Wallis, J.R., Kendall, R.P. and Little, T.E.
    [1985] Constrained Residual Acceleration of Conjugate Residual Methods. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, Y., Hajibeygi, H. and Tchelepi, H.A.
    [2014] Algebraic multiscale solver for flow in heterogeneous porous media.J. Comput. Phys., 259, 284–303.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Watts, J.
    [1986] A compositional formulation of the pressure and saturation equations.SPE Reserv. Eng., 1(03), 243–252.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802251
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802251
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error