Field and laboratory Validation of ERT-Detected Subsurface Heterogeneity at the Meter Scale

References

1. Anderson, J.L. and Bouma, J.
   [1973] Relationships Between Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity and Morphometric Data of an Argillic Horizon. SSSA Proc.37:408–421.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Angulo-Jarmillo, R.,
   2000. Field measurement of soil surface hydraulic properties by disc and ring infiltrometers: A review and recent developments. Soil Till. Res.55: 1–29.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Binley, A., Kemna, A.
   [2005] DC Resistivity and Induced Polarization Methods. In: RubinB. Hubbard, S.S. (Editors), Hydrogeophysics. Springer, pp. 129–156
   [Google Scholar]
4. Jørgensen, P. and Østmo, S.R.
   [1990] Hydrogeology in the Romerike area, Southern Norway. NGU Bull.418:19–26.
   [Google Scholar]
5. KværnøS.H., Haugen, L.E., Børresen, T.
   [2007] Variability in topsoil texture and carbon content within soil map units and its implications in predicting soil water content for optimum workabilitySoil Till. Res.95: 332–347.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Depountis, N., Harris, C., DaviesM.C.R.
   [2001] An assessment of miniaturised electrical imaging equipment to monitor pollution plume evolution in scaled centrifuge modellingEngin. Geol.60: 83–94.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Kemna, A., Binley, A., Ramirez, A., Daily, W.
   [2000] Complex resistivity tomography for environmental applications. Chem. Eng. J.77: 11–18.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Olsen, P.A., Binley, A., Henry-Poulter, S., Tychet, W.
   [1999] Characterizing solute transport in undisturbed soil cores using electrical and X-ray tomographic methodsHydrol. Process. 13: 211–221.
   [Google Scholar]