1887

Abstract

Summary

Recently developed and currently available on the market multichannel broadband multifunction EM instruments of the generation 5+ have levelled the costs of one measuring channel as well as field survey productivity during investigations of shallow geoelectric sections (up to 200m) with geometrical and induction EM soundings methods. Hence, it raises question of comparing resolution capabilities, sensitivity, productivity of geometrical and induction EM soundings methods during investigations of shallow sections. Research carried out by the authors has shown that the control source frequency domain electromagnetic sounding method (CSFDEMS or formerly FDEMS-IP) is the most sensitive to variation of parameters in the geoelectric sections, and subsequently, the most accurate for mapping boundaries of geoelectric section’s layers. The FDEMS method was developed in former USSR in the 50s of previous century together with MT and TEM and was mainly unknown in western countries. Since then, extensive FDEMS method field application experience has been accumulated and with new capabilities of recently developed equipment and software it became sensitive, highly productive and EM noise resistant method.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802530
2018-09-09
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berdichevsky, M.N., and Dmitriev, V.I.
    [2009] Models and Methods of Magnetotellurics. Scientific World, Moscow.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Enenstein, B.S.
    [1967] Ways to interpret two-layer frequency sounding curves. Reports of USSR Academy of Science - Physics of the Earth, 9.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gorunov, A.S., IngerovA.I., and Kulikov, A.V.
    [1987] Equipment EVA-203 application for Frequency Electromagnetic sounding. Application Geophysics, 117, 62–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ingerov, A.I., and Soldatenko, V.P.
    [1998] About accuracy of the depth of high resistive reference horizon estimation by methods of frequency electromagnetic sounding. The reports of National Academy of Science of Ukraine, 12, 123–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ingerov, A.I., Ingerov, I.A., LozovoyA.L., and MendriyY.V.
    [2012] Application of amplitude and phase curves received by induction sounding with natural sources for the purpose of mapping. Scientific Bulletin of National Mining University, Scientific and technical journal, 2, 5–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ingerov, A.I., Ingerov, I.A., LozovoyA.L., and Mendriy, Y.V.
    [2015] Differential curves of induction electromagnetic soundings with natural sources for structural mapping in oil and gas geology. Scientific Bulletin of National Mining University, Scientific and technical journal, 1, 42–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lozovoy, A.L., Ingerov, A.I., and Soldatenko, V.P.
    [2011] The method of significant points FDEMS data interpretation in conditions of Ukrainian Shield. Materials of the Fifth all-Russian workshop-seminar in the name of M.N. Berdichevsky and L.L. Vanyan on electromagnetic soundings of the Earth - EMS-2011, Abstract Book, 2, 194–196.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tikhonov, A.N.
    [1950] About determining the electrical properties of deep layers of Earth crust and mantle. Abstracts of USSR Academy of Science, series 1950, Vol. 73(2), 295–297.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Vanyan, L.L.
    [1965] The basis of electromagnetic soundings. Nedra, Moscow.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802530
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802530
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error