1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

Due to the geometry and sea effect, an adaptive methodology is required in the case of the geophysical assessment of coastal concrete infrastructures. Along with other observables, these distinctivenesses influence the resistivity and permittivity measurement. The procedure jointly uses the ERT and GPR geophysical methods and is directly taking into account the geometrical engineered particularities, and the presence of the sea water. With complex geometrical shapes addressing the engineering needs, measurements are directly under the effect of the general geometry and underlying structures. In order to identify the 3D structures, the acquisition and the processing steps have to take into account these complexities and the corresponding anomalies. The process considers the geotechnical and geometrical properties during the data processing and inversion problem in order to assess the coastal concrete infrastructure state.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802540
2018-09-09
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802540
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Athanasiou, E.N., Tsourlos, P.I., Vargemezis, G.N., Papazachos, C.B. and Tsokas, G.N.
    [2007], Non-destructive DC resistivity surveying using flat-base electrodes. Near Surface Geophysics, 5(4), 263–272.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bano, M.
    [1996], Constant dielectric losses of ground-penetrating radar. Geophysical Journal International, 124, 279–288.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Fargier, Y., Palma Lopes, S., Fauchard, C., François, D. and Côte, P.
    [2014], DC-Electrical Resistivity Imaging for embankment dike investigation: A 3D extended normalisation approach. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 103, 245–256.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Gürel, L. and Oguz, U.
    [2001], Simulations of ground-penetrating radars over lossy and heterogeneous grounds. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 39, 1190–1197.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Jodry, C., Palma Lopes, S., Fargier, Y., Côte, P. and Sanchez, M.
    [2017], A cost-effective 3D electrical resistivity imaging approach applied to dike investigation. Near Surface Geophysics, 15(1), 27–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Karhunen, K., Seppänen, A., Lehikoinen, A., Monteiro, P. J.M. and Kaipio, J. P.
    [2010], Electrical Resistance Tomography imaging of concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 40(1), 137–145.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Sentenac, P., Benes, V., Budinsky, V., Keenan, H., and Baron, R.
    [2017], Post flooding damage assessment of earth dams and historical reservoirs using non-invasive geophysical techniques. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 146, 138–148.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802540
Loading
Development of Geophysical Methodologies for the Assessment of Coastal Concrete Infrastructures
Conference Proceedings 2018, 1 (2018); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201802540
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802540
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802540
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error