1887

Abstract

Summary

We demonstrate in this geothermal exploration case study performed in The Netherlands that ambient noise seismic interferometry (ANSI) can be an effective and efficient method for obtaining surface wave dispersion curves, leading to shallow shear-wave velocity-depth profiles that can improve imaging of deep structures. As the ANSI method requires a relatively small fraction of the cost of an active seismic survey, it could be a valuable addition to future subsurface exploration.

A velocity transition was found at a depth of ~55 m, which correlates very well with the transition found in borehole studies. The shear-wave velocities found in this study can be used not only for improved structural imaging of geothermal reservoir potential, but also for computing rigidity and shear modulus of the shallow subsurface, which are vital properties for the construction industry.

Furthermore, it is shown that merging passive and active data enhances the frequency-bandwidth of the data, thereby increasing the resolution of shear-wave velocity-versus-depth profiles in the subsurface.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802603
2018-09-09
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Boschi, L., and Weemstra, C.
    [2015] Stationary-phase integrals in the cross-correlation of ambient noise, Rev. Geophys., 53, 411–451, doi:10.1002/2014RG000455.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000455 [Google Scholar]
  2. Fichtner, A., Stehly, L., Ermert, L., Boehm, C.
    [2017] Generalized interferometry - I: Theory for interstation correlations, Geophysical Journal International208, 603–608.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Haskell, N. A.
    , [1953] The dispersion of surface waves on multilayered media, Bulletin of the seismological Society of America, 43, 17–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. SoumenKoley, Henk JanBulten, Jo van denBrand, MariaBader, XanderCampman, and MarkBeker
    [2017] S-wave Velocity Model Estimation using Ambient Seismic Noise at Virgo, Italy. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017, pp. 2946–2950. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-17681951.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Li, P., Zhang, K., Zhang, Y., & Yan, Z.
    [2016] Near-surface shear-wave velocity estimation based on surface-wave inversion. The Leading Edge, 35(11), 940–945.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Eileen R.Martin, Chris M.Castillo, SteveCole, Paphop StockSawasdee, SiyuanYuan, RobertClapp, MartinKarrenbach, and Biondo L.Biondi
    [2017] Seismic monitoring leveraging existing telecom infrastructure at the SDASA: Active, passive, and ambient-noise analysis. The Leading Edge, 36(12), 1025–1031. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle36121025.1
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sambridge, M.
    [1999] Geophysical inversion with a neighbourhood 5algorithm—II. Appraising the ensemble. Geophysical Journal International, 138(3), 727–746.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ShapiroN. and M.Campillo
    [2004] Emergence of broadband Rayleigh waves from correlations of ambient seismic noise. Geophysical Research Letters, 31, L07614, doi:10.1029/2004GL019491.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019491 [Google Scholar]
  9. KeesWapenaar, DeyanDraganov, RoelSnieder, XanderCampman, and ArieVerdel
    [2010] Tutorial on seismic interferometry: Part 1 — Basic principles and applications. Geophysics, 75(5), 75A195–75A209. https://doi.org/10.1190/L3457445.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wathelet, M.
    [2008] An improved neighborhood algorithm: parameter conditions and dynamic scaling, Geophysical Research Letters, 35, L09301, doi:10.1029/2008GL033256.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033256 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802603
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802603
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error