1887

Abstract

Summary

Sea level rise and an intensification of storm surges associated with climate change demand non-invasive evaluation methods to estimate the state of coastal defenses. A promising tool is seismic full waveform inversion (FWI), a data fitting optimization approach to recover high resolution multi-parameter distributions of the sub-surface. In this study we apply FWI to SH-data acquired on a sea dike located in northern Germany. An analysis of the first arrival traveltime information and subsequent SH-FWI reveal a distinct dichotomy of the sea dike. While both sides of the dike share a low-velocity layer in the upper 1.5 m, S-wave velocities are systematically larger by approximately 30 m/s on the land- than on the sea-side. A similar trend can be observed for Qs-values with an average Qs = 50 on the landside and Qs = 20 on the seaside. The FWI results show horizontal higher velocity layers at the dike base, which can be correlated with distinct sand layers visible in borehole profiles. The near surface structure of the dike is locally disturbed by low-velocity zones, which can be partly related to marine clay but might also be influenced by variable water saturation within the dike.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802608
2018-09-09
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bunks, C., Saleck, F., Zaleski, S. and Chavent, G.
    [1995] Multiscale seismic waveform inversion. Geophysics, 60(5), 1457–1473.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Choi, Y. and Alkhalifah, T.
    [2012] Application of multi-source waveform inversion to marine streamer data using the global correlation norm. Geophysical Prospecting, 60, 748–758.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dokter, E., Köhn, D., Wilken, D., De Nil, D. and Rabbel, W.
    [2017] Full-waveform inversion of SH- and Love-wave data in near-surface prospecting. Geophysical Prospecting, 65(S1), 216–236.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fabien-Ouellet, G., Gloaguen, E. and Giroux, B.
    [2017] Time domain viscoelastic full waveform inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 209(3), 1718.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Feuvre, M.L., Joubert, A., Leparoux, D. and Côte, P.
    [2015] Passive multi-channel analysis of surface waves with cross-correlations and beamforming. Application to a sea dike. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 114, 36–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Groos, L., Schäfer, M., Forbriger, T. and Bohlen, T.
    [2014] The role of attenuation in 2D full-waveform inversion of shallow-seismic body and Rayleigh waves. Geophysics, 79(6), R247–R261.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jaksch, K.
    [2009] Seismisches Monitoring an lehmigen Modelldeichen. Ph.D. thesis, TU Bergakademie Freiberg. Available at http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:105-7556238.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Köhn, D., Wilken, D., De Nil, D., Wunderlich, T., Rabbel, W. and Werther, L.
    [2018] 2D full waveform inversion applied to a strongly-dispersive Love wave field dataset. In: 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics. Copenhagen.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Nocedal, J. and Wright, S.
    [2006] Numerical Optimization. Springer, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802608
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802608
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error