1887
Volume 66, Issue 7
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The theory and practice of multisource full‐waveform inversion of marine supergathers are described with a frequency‐selection strategy. The key enabling property of frequency selection is that it eliminates the crosstalk among sources, thus overcoming the aperture mismatch of marine multisource inversion. Tests on multisource full‐waveform inversion of synthetic marine data and also the Gulf of Mexico data show speedups of 4 × and 8 × , respectively, compared with conventional full‐waveform inversion.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12588
2018-06-05
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BartonG.1989. Elements of Green's Functions and Propagation: Potentials, Diffusion, and Waves. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ben‐Hadj‐AliH., OpertoS. and VirieuxJ.2009. Three‐dimensional frequency‐domain full waveform inversion with phase encoding. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 2288–2292.
  3. BoonyasiriwatC. and SchusterG.2010. 3D multisource full‐waveform inversion using dynamic quasi‐Monte Carlo phase encoding. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 1044–1049.
  4. BottouL. and BousquetO.2011. The tradeoffs of large‐scale learning. In: Optimization for Machine Learning, p. 351.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BunksC., SaleckF.M., ZaleskiS. and ChaventG.1995. Multiscale seismic waveform inversion. Geophysics60, 1457–1473.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DaiW., FowlerP. and SchusterG.T.2012. Multi‐source least‐squares reverse time migration. Geophysical Prospecting60, 681–695.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DaiW., HuangY. and SchusterG.T.2013. Least‐squares reverse time migration of marine data with frequency‐selection encoding. Geophysics78, S233–S242.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. DaiW. and SchusterG.T.2009. Least‐squares migration of simultaneous sources data with a deblurring filter. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 2990–2994.
  9. DaiW. and SchusterG.T.2013. Plane‐wave least‐squares reverse‐time migration. Geophysics78, S165–S177.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. EtgenJ.T.2005. How many angles do we really need for delayedshot migration? SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 1985–1988.
  11. FichtnerA.2011. Full Seismic Waveform Modelling and Inversion. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GodwinJ. and SavaP.2010. Blended source imaging by amplitude encoding. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 3125–3129.
  13. HuangY. and SchusterG.2012. Multisource least‐squares migration of marine streamer and land data with frequency‐division encoding. Geophysical Prospecting60, 663–680.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. JingX., FinnC.J., DickensT.A. and WillenD.E.2000. Encoding multiple shot gathers in prestack migration. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 786–789.
  15. KiwielK.C.2001. Convergence and effciency of subgradient methods for quasiconvex minimization. Mathematical Programming90, 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. KrebsJ.R., AndersonJ.E., HinkleyD., NeelamaniR., LeeS., BaumsteinA. et al. 2009, Fast full‐wavefield seismic inversion using encoded sources. Geophysics74, WCC177–WCC188.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. MortonS.A. and OberC.C.1998. Faster shot‐record migrations using phase encoding. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 1131–1134.
  18. NiheiK. and LiX.2007. Frequency response modelling of seismic waves using finite difference time domain with phase sensitive detection (td ‐psd). Geophysical Journal International169, 1069–1078.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. PressW.H., TeukolskyS.A., VetterlingW.T. and FlanneryB.P.2007. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. RomeroL.A., GhigliaD.C., OberC.C. and MortonS.A.2000. Phase encoding of shot records in prestack migration. Geophysics65, 426–436.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. SchusterG.T., WangX., HuangY., DaiW. and BoonyasiriwatC.2011. Theory of multisource crosstalk reduction by phase‐encoded statics. Geophysical Journal International184, 1289–1303.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SirgueL., EtgenJ. and AlbertinU.2008. 3D frequency domain waveform inversion using time domain finite difference methods. Proceedings of the 70th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Rome, Italy.
  23. SpallJ.2003. Introduction to Stochastic Search and Optimization: Estimation, Simulation, and Control. John Wiley and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. TangY. and BiondiB.2009. Least‐squares migration/inversion of blended data. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 2859–2863.
  25. VighD. and StarrE.W.2008. 3D prestack plane‐wave, full‐waveform inversion. Geophysics73, VE135–VE144.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. VirieuxJ., AsnaashariA., BrossierR., MtivierL., RibodettiA. and ZhouW.2017. An introduction to full waveform inversion. In: Encyclopedia of Exploration Geophysics, pp. R1‐1–R1‐40. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. ZhangY., SunJ., NotforsC., GrayS., ChernisL. and YoungJ.2003. Delayed‐shot 3D prestack depth migration. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 1027–1030.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12588
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12588
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): High-frequency noise; Instrument approach; Satellite beam

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error