1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

This paper presents problems correlated to unsuccessful MMP determination by STT, then procedure of samples preparation for Huff-n-Puff test, intermediate results of Huff-n-Puff test and MMP calculation via MMP correlations for the provided oil samples.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802977
2018-11-21
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2018/Th_CO2_09.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802977&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ahmed, T.
    2010. Equations of State and PVT Analysys, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-l-933762-03-6.50010-1.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alston, R.B., Kokolis, G.P. & James, C.F.
    1985. CO2 Minimum Miscibility Pressure: A Correlation for Impure CO2 Streams and Live Oil Systems.Society of Petroleum Engineers, 25, 7, https://doi.Org/https://doi.org/10.2118/11959-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chukwudeme, E.A. & Hamouda, A.A.
    2009. Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) by miscible CO2 and water flooding of asphaltenic and non-asphaltenic oils.Energies, 2, 714–737, https://doi.org/10.3390/en20300714.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cuthiell, D., Kissel, G., Jackson, C, Frauenfeld, T., Fisher, D. & Rispler, K.
    2006. Viscous fingering effects in solvent displacement of heavy oil.Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 45, 29–38, https://doi.org/10.2118/06-07-02.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hawthorne, S.B., Miller, D.J.
    , . 2017. Measured Crude Oil MMPs with Pure and Mixed CO2, Methane, and Ethane, and Their Relevance to Enhanced Oil Recovery from Middle Bakken and Bakken Shales.In: SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, https://doi.org/10.2118/185072-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hutchinson, C.A. & Braun, P.H.
    1961. Phase relations of miscible displacement in oil recovery.ChE Journal, 7, 64–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, L.& Sheng, J.J.
    2016. Experimental study of core size effect on CH4 huff-n-puff enhanced oil recovery in liquid-rich shale reservoirs.Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 34, 1392–1402, https://doi.org/10.1016/jjngse.2016.08.028.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, L., Zhang, Y. & Sheng, J.J.
    2017. Effect of the Injection Pressure on Enhancing Oil Recovery in Shale Cores during the CO2 Huff-n-Puff Process When It Is above and below the Minimum Miscibility Pressure.Energy and Fuels, 31, 3856–3867, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00031.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Quoc, T., Duy, M., Neogi, P. & Bai, B.
    2017. Stability of CO2 Displacement of an Immiscible Heavy Oil in a Reservoir.1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Rudyk, S.N., Søgaard, E.G., Abbasi, WA. & Jørgensen, L.W.
    2009a. Determination of Minimum Miscibility Pressure in supercritical extractor using oil saturated sample.Chemical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, 17, 1, https://doi.org/10.3303/CET0917256.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rudyk, S.N., Søgaard, E.G., Abbasi, W.A. & Jørgensen, L.W.
    2009b. Determination of Minimum Miscibility Pressure in supercritical extractor using oil saturated sample (Short). 6.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Tathed, V., Dandekar, A.Y.Dandekar, A.Y. & Patil, S.L.
    2010. Determination of Minimum Miscibility Pressure using Vanishing Interfacial Tension ( VIT ) in Support of EOR for Alaska North Slope ( ANS ) Heavy Oil.7, 71–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Yellig, W.F. & Metcalfe, RS.
    1980. Determination and Prediction of CO2 Minimum Miscibility Pressures.Journal of Petroleum Technology, 160–168, https://doi.org/10.2118/7477-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802977
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802977
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error