1887
Volume 24, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1354-0793
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

The relationship between porosity and permeability in limestones is a fundamental constitutive equation in subsurface fluid flow modelling, and is essential in quantifying a range of geological processes. For a given porosity, the permeability of limestones varies over a range of up to five orders of magnitude. Permeability of a given rock sample depends on the total amount of pore space, characterized by porosity, as well as how the pore space is distributed within the rock, which can be expressed as a probability density function of pore sizes. We investigate in this study whether the information about pore-size distribution can be sufficiently captured by the bulk petrographical properties extracted from thin sections. We demonstrate that most of the uncertainty can be explained by variations in texture, which is defined by the mud content (mass fraction of particles less than 0.06 mm in diameter). Using mud content as a quantitative texture descriptor, we used multivariable regression and neural network models to predict permeability from porosity. For a given porosity, inclusion of mud content reduces the uncertainty in permeability prediction from five to two orders of magnitude.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2017-052
2017-11-23
2024-03-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ali Ahmadi, M., Zendehboudi, S., Lohi, A., Elkamel, A. & Chatzis, I.
    2013. Reservoir permeability prediction by neural networks combined with hybrid genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization. Geophysical Prospecting, 61, 582–598.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Balan, B., Mohaghegh, S. & Ameri, S.
    1995. State-of-the art in permeability determination from well log data: Part 1 – a comparative study, model development. Paper presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, 18–20 September 1995, Morgantown, WV, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beavington-Penney, S.J., Nadin, P., Wright, V.P., Clarke, E., McQuilken, J. & Bailey, H.W.
    2008. Reservoir quality variation on an Eocene carbonate ramp, El Garia Formation, offshore Tunisia: Structural control of burial corrosion and dolomitisation. Sedimentary Geology, 209, 42–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cantrell, D.L. & Hagerty, R.M.
    2003. Reservoir rock classification, Arab-D reservoir, Ghawar field, Saudi Arabia. GeoArabia, 8, 435–462.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cantrell, D.L., Swart, P.K. & Hagerty, R.M.
    2004. Genesis and characterization of dolomite, Arab-D reservoir, Ghawar field, Saudi Arabia. GeoArabia, 9, 11–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Choquette, P.W. & Pray, L.C.
    1970. Geologic nomenclature and classification of porosity in sedimentary carbonates. AAPG Bulletin, 54, 207–250.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Corbett, P.W.N. & Jensen, J.L.
    2000. Lithological and zonal porosity–permeability distributions in the Arab-D reservoir, Utmaniyah field, Saudi Arabia: Discussion. AAPG Bulletin, 84, 1365–1367.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cox, P.A., Wood, R.A., Dickson, J.A.D., Al Rougha, H.B., Shebl, H. & Corbett, P.W.M.
    2010. Dynamics of cementation in response to oil charge: evidence from a Cretaceous carbonate field, UAE. Sedimentary Geology, 228, 246–254.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ehrenberg, S.N., Eberli, G.P. & Baechle, G.
    2006. Porosity–permeability relationships in Miocene carbonate platforms and slopes seaward of the Great Barrier reef, Australia (ODP Leg 194, Marion plateau). Sedimentology, 53, 1289–1318.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Folk, R.L.
    1962. Spectral subdivision of limestone types. In: Ham, W.E. (ed.) Classification of Carbonates Rocks. A Symposium. American Association of Petroleum Geologist, Memoirs, 1, 62–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gill, P.E. & Murray, W.
    1978. Algorithms for the solution of the nonlinear least-squares problem. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 15, 977–992.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Handford, C.R., Cantrell, D.L. & Keith, T.H.
    2002. Regional facies relationships and sequence stratigraphy of a super-giant reservoir (Arab-D Member), Saudi Arabia. In: Armentrout, J.M. (ed.) Sequence Stratigraphic Models for Exploration and Production: Evolving Methodology, Emerging Models and Application Histories. 22nd Annual Bob F. Perkins Research Conference. Gulf Coast Section SEPM (GCSSEPM), Houston, TX, 539–564.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hollis, C., Vahrenkamp, V., Tull, S., Mookerjee, A., Taberner, C. & Huang, Y.
    2010. Pore system characterisation in heterogeneous carbonates: An alternative approach to widely-used rock-typing methodologies. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 27, 772–793.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hulea, I.N. & Nicholls, C.A.
    2012. Carbonate rock characterization and modeling: Capillary pressure and permeability in multimodal rocks – A look beyond sample specific heterogeneity. AAPG Bulletin, 96, 1627–1642.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kerr, P.
    1977. Optical Mineralogy. 4th edn.McGraw-Hill, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lindsay, R.F., Cantrell, D.L., Hughes, G.W., Keith, T.H., Mueller, H.W. & Russell, S.D.
    2006. Ghawar Arab-D reservoir: widespread porosity in shoaling-upward carbonate cycles, Saudi Arabia. In: Harris, P.M. & Weber, L.J. (eds) Giant Hydrocarbon Reservoirs of the World: From Rocks to Reservoir Characterization and Modeling. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Memoirs, 91/ SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology), Special Publications, 97–137.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu, H. & Motoda, H.
    (eds). 2007. Computational Methods of Feature Selection. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Loucks, R.G.
    2002. Controls on reservoir quality in platform interior limestones around the Gulf of Mexico: Example from the lower cretaceous Pearsall formation in south Texas. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, 52, 659–672.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lu, P. & Cantrell, D.
    2016. Reactive transport modeling of reflux dolomitization in the Arab-D reservoir, Ghawar field, Saudi Arabia. Sedimentology, 63, 865–892.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lucia, F.J.
    1995. Rock-fabric/petrophysical classification of carbonate pore space for reservoir characterization. AAPG Bulletin, 79, 1275–1300.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lucia, F.J., Jennings, J.W., Rahnis, M. & Meyer, F.O.
    2001. Permeability and rock fabric from wireline logs, Arab-D reservoir, Ghawar field, Saudi Arabia. GeoArabia, 6, 619–646.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Melim, L.A., Anselmetti, F.S. & Eberli, G.P.
    2001. The importance of pore type on permeability of Neogene carbonates, great Bahama bank. In: Ginsburg, R.N. (ed.) Subsurface Geology of a Prograding Carbonate Platform Margin, Great Bahama Bank: Results of the Bahamas Drilling Project. SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology), Special Publications, 70, 217–238.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Melzer, S.E. & Budd, D.A.
    2008. Retention of high permeability during shallow burial (300 to 500 m) of carbonate grainstones. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 78, 548–561.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Meyer, F.O. & Price, R.C.
    1993. A new Arab-D depositional model, Ghawar field, Saudi Arabia. SPE Paper 25576 presented at the Middle East Oil Show, 3–6 April 1993, Bahrain.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mitchell, J.C., Lehmann, P.J., Cantrell, D.L., Al-Jallal, I.A. & Al-Thagafy, M.A.R.
    1988. Lithofacies, diagenesis and depositional sequence; Arab-D Member, Ghawar field, Saudi Arabia. In: Lomando, A.J. & Harris, P.M. (eds) Giant Oil and Gas Fields – A Core Workshop. SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology), Core Workshop, 12, 459–514.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mohaghegh, S., Arefi, R. et al.
    1995. Design and development of an artificial neural network for estimation of formation permeability. SPE Computer Applications, 7, 151–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Rider, M. & Kennedy, M.
    2014. The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs. 3rd edn.Rider-French Consulting, Aberdeen.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Saemi, M., Ahmadi, M. & Varjani, A.Y.
    2007. Design of neural networks using genetic algorithm for the permeability estimation of the reservoir. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 59, 97–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Saner, S. & Sahin, A.
    1999. Lithological and zonal porosity permeability distributions in the Arab-D reservoir, Uthmaniyah field, Saudi Arabia. AAPG Bulletin, 83, 230–243.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Swart, P.K., Cantrell, D.L., Westphal, H., Handford, C.R. & Kendall, C.
    2005. Origin of dolomite from Ghawar field, Saudi Arabia: evidence from petrographic and geochemical constraints. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 75, 476491.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Swart, P.K., Cantrell, D.L., Arienzo, M.M. & Murray, S.T.
    2016. Evidence for high temperature and 18O-enriched fluids in the Arab-D of the Ghawar Field, Saudi Arabia. Sedimentology, 63, 1739–1752.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Warrlich, G., Hillgartner, H. et al.
    2010. Reservoir characterisation of data-poor fields with regional analogues: A case study from the Lower Shu'aiba in the Sultanate of Oman. In: van Buchem, F.S.P., Al-Husseini, M.I., Maurer, F. & Droste, H.J. (eds) Berremiam–Aptian Stratigraphy and Hydrocarbon habitat of the Eastern Arabian Plate, Volume 2. GeoArabia, Special Publications, 4, 577–604.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Yang, Y. & Aplin, A.C.
    2010. A permeability–porosity relationship for mudstones. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 27, 1692–1697.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2017-052
Loading
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2017-052
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error