Estimation of hydraulic parameters using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and empirical laws in a semi‐confined aquifer

References

1. ArchieG.E.1942. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the American Institute Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers146, 54–62.
   [Google Scholar]
2. R.E.de Barrio
   AugeM.2005. Hidrogeología de La Plata, Provincia de Buenos Aires. In: Relatorio del XVI Congreso Geológico Argentino (eds R.E.de Barrio , R.O.Etcheverry , M.F.Caballé and E.Llambías ) pp.293–312. Quick Press, La Plata.
   [Google Scholar]
3. AugeM., HirataR. and López VeraF.2004. Vulnerabilidad a la contaminación por nitratos del acuífero Puelche en La Plata Argentina. Centro de Estudios de América Latina. Buenos Aires. http://www.bfa.fcnym.unlp.edu.ar/catalogo/doc_num.php?explnum_id=239
   [Google Scholar]
4. BohlingG.C. and ButlerJ.J.Jr. 2010. Inherent limitations of hydraulic tomography. Groundwater48, 809–824.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CaminosR.1999. Geología Argentina. Buenos Aires. Instituto de Geología y Recursos Minerales. SEGEMAR. ISSN 0328–2325.
6. CarmanP.C.1937. Fluid flow through granular beds. Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers15, 415–421.
   [Google Scholar]
7. CaterinaD., BeaujeanJ., RobertT. and NguyenF.2013. A comparison study of image different appraisal tools for electrical resistivity tomography. Near Surface Geophysics11, 639–657.
   [Google Scholar]
8. ChandraS., AhmedS., RamA. and DewandelB.2008. Estimation of hard rock aquifers hydraulic conductivity from geoelectrical measurements: a theoretical development with field application. Journal of Hydrology357, 218–227.
   [Google Scholar]
9. ChenJ., HubbardS.S. and RubinY.2001. Estimating the hydraulic conductivity at the South Oyster Site from geophysical tomographic data using Bayesian techniques based on the normal linear regression model. Water Resources Research37, 1603–1613.
   [Google Scholar]
10. ChooH., KimJ., LeeW. and LeeC.2016. Relationship between hydraulic conductivity and formation factor of coarse‐grained soils as a function of particle size. Journal of Applied Geophysics127, 91–101.
    [Google Scholar]
11. M.A.Lovell
    ClennellM.B.1997. Tortuosity: a guide through the maze. In: Developments in Petrophysics: Geological Society, Vol. 122 (eds M.A.Lovell and P.K.Harvey ) pp. 299–344. Geological Society, London.
    [Google Scholar]
12. CostaA.2006. Permeability‐porosity relationship: a reexamination of the Kozeny‐Carman equation based on a fractal pore‐space geometry assumption. Geophysical Research Letters33, L02318.
    [Google Scholar]
13. CrestaniE., CamporeseM and SalandinP.2015. Assessment of hydraulic conductivity distributions through assimilation of travel time data from ERT‐monitored tracer tests. Advances in Water Resources84, 23–36.
    [Google Scholar]
14. deGroot‐HedlinC. and ConstableS.1990. Occam's inversion to generate smooth, two‐dimensional models for magnetotelluric data. Geophysics55, 1613–1624.
    [Google Scholar]
15. DhakateR. and SinghV.S.2005. Estimation of hydraulic parameters from surface geophysical methods, Kaliapani Ultramafic complex, Orissa, India. Journal of Enviromental Hydrology13, 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Di MaioR., PiegariE., ToderoG., and FabbrocinoS.2015. A combined use of Archie and van Genuchten models for predicting hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated pyroclastic soils. Journal of Applied Geophysics112, 249–255.
    [Google Scholar]
17. DriscollF.G.1989. Groundwater and Wells , 2nd edn. Johnson Screens.
18. FarzamianM., Monteiro SantosF.A. and Khalil, M.A.2015. Estimation of unsaturated hydraulic parameters in sandstone using electrical resistivity tomography under a water injection test. Journal of Applied Geophysics121, 71–83.
    [Google Scholar]
19. FittsC.R.2002. Groundwater Science. Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. FreezeR.A. and CherryJ.A.1979. Groundwater. Prentice‐Hall Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
21. GomezC.T., DvorkinJ. and VanorioT.2010. Laboratory measurements of porosity, permeability, resistivity and velocity on Fontainebleau sandstones. Geophysics75, E191–E204.
    [Google Scholar]
22. HeigoldP.C., GilkesonR.H., CartwrightK. and ReedP.C.1979. Aquifer transmissivity from surficial electrical methods. Groundwater17, 338–345.
    [Google Scholar]
23. HeinzJ., KleinedamS., TeutschG., and AignerT.2003. Heterogeineity patterns of Quaternary glaciofluvial gravel bodies (SW Germany): application to hydrogeology, Sedimentary Geology158, 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
24. HochstetlerD.L., BarrashW., LevenC., CardiffM., ChidichimoF. and KitanidisP.K.2016. Hydraulic tomography: continuity and discontinuity of high‐K and low‐K zones. Groundwater54, 171–185.
    [Google Scholar]
25. IrvingJ and SinghaK. 2010. Stochastic inversion of tracer test and electrical geophysical data to estimate hydraulic conductivities. Water Resources Research46, W11514.
    [Google Scholar]
26. JacksonP.D., Taylor SmithD. and StanfordP.N.1978. Resistivity‐porosity‐particle shape relationships for marine sands. Geophysics43, 1250–1268.
    [Google Scholar]
27. JonesP.H. and BufordT.B.1951. Electric logging applied to groundwater exploration. Geophysics16, 115–139.
    [Google Scholar]
28. KellyW.E.1977. Geoelectric sounding for estimating aquifer hydraulic conductivity. Groundwater15, 420–425.
    [Google Scholar]
29. KhalilM.A., RamalhoE.C. and Monteiro SantosF.A.2011. Using resistivity logs to estimate hydraulic conductivity of a Nubian sandstone aquifer in southern Egypt. Near Surface Geophysics9, 349–355.
    [Google Scholar]
30. KozenyJ.1927. Ueber kapillare Leitung des Wassers im Boden. Sitzungsber Akademie der Wissenschaften136, 271–306.
    [Google Scholar]
31. KozenyJ.1953. Hydraulik. Springer‐Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
32. LokeM.H.1999. RES2DMOD ver 2.2: Rapid 2D resistivity forward modelling using the finite‐difference and finite‐element methods, Geotomo Software, Penang, Malaysia. (https://www.geotomosoft.com).
33. LokeM.H.2006. RES2DINV ver. 3.50, Rapid 2‐D resistivity and IP inversion using the least square method, Geotomo Software, Penang, Malaysia. (https://www.geotomosoft.com).
34. LokeM.H.2015. Tutorial: 2D and 3D electrical imaging surveys, Geotomo Software, Penang, Malaysia. (https://www.geotomosoft.com).
35. LokeM.H. and BarkerR.D.1996. Rapid least‐squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi‐Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting44, 131–152.
    [Google Scholar]
36. MailletR.1947. The fundamental equation of electrical prospecting. Geophysics12, 529–556.
    [Google Scholar]
37. MassoudU., SantosF., KhalilM.A., TahaA. and AbbasA.M.2010. Estimation of aquifer hydraulic parameters from surface geophysical measurements: a case study of the Upper Cretaceous aquifer, central Sinai, Egypt. Hydrogeology Journal18, 699–710.
    [Google Scholar]
38. MazáčO., KellyW.E. and LandaI.1985. A hydrogeophysical model for relations between electrical and hydraulic properties of aquifers. Journal of Hydrology79, 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
39. MesgouezA., BuisS., RuyS. and Lefeuve‐MesgouezG.2014. Uncertainty analysis and validation of the estimation of effective hydraulic properties at the Darcy scale. Journal of Hydrology512, 303–314.
    [Google Scholar]
40. MilschH., BlöcherG. and EngelmannS.2008. The relationship between hydraulic and electrical transport properties in sandstone: An experimental evaluation of several scaling models. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 275, 355–363.
    [Google Scholar]
41. MorinR.H.2006Negative correlation between porosity and hydraulic conductivity in sand‐and‐gravel aquifers at Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA. Journal of Hydrology316, 43–52. https://doi.org.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.04.013
    [Google Scholar]
42. NiwasS. and CelikM.2012. Equation estimation of porosity and hydraulic conductivity of Ruhrtal aquifer in Germany using near surface geophysics. Journal of Applied Geophysics84, 77–85. https://doi.org.10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.06.001
    [Google Scholar]
43. NiwasS. and SinghalD.C.1981. Estimation of aquifer transmissivity from Dar‐Zarrouk parameters in porous media. Journal of Hydrology50, 393–399.
    [Google Scholar]
44. NiwasS., TezkanB. and IsrailM.2011. Aquifer hydraulic conductivity estimation from surface geoelectrical measurements for Krauthausen test site, Germany. Hydrogeology Journal19, 307–315.
    [Google Scholar]
45. PurvanceD.T. and AndricevicR.2000. On the electrical‐hydraulic conductivity correlation in aquifers. Water Resources Research36, 2905–2913.
    [Google Scholar]
46. RevilA. and CathlesL.M.III1999. Permeability of shaly sands. Water Resources Research35, 651–662.
    [Google Scholar]
47. RevilA., KaraoulisM., JohnsonT. and KemnaA.2012. Review: Some low‐frequency electrical methods for subsurface characterization and monitoring in hydrogeology. Hydrogeology Journal20, 617–658.
    [Google Scholar]
48. RubinY.2003. Applied Stochastic Hydrogeology. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. RuggeriP., GloaguenE., LefebvreR., IrvingJ. and HolligerK.2014. Integration of hydrological and geophysical data beyond the local scale: application of Bayesian sequential simulation to field data from the Saint‐Lambert‐de‐Lauzon site, Québec, Canada. Journal of Hydrology514, 271–280.
    [Google Scholar]
50. RuggeriP., IrvingJ., GloaguenE. and HolligerK.2013. Regional–scale integration of multiresolution hydrological and geophysical data using a two‐step Bayesian sequential simulation approach. Geophysical Journal International194, 289–303.
    [Google Scholar]
51. ShevninV., Delgado‐RodriguezO., MousatovA. and RyjovA.2006. Estimation of hydraulic conductivity on clay content in soil determined from resistivity data. Geofísica Internacional45, 195–207.
    [Google Scholar]
52. SinghK.P.2005. Nonlinear estimation of aquifer parameters from surfficial resistivity measurements. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions2, 917–938.
    [Google Scholar]
53. SinhaR., IsrailM. and SinghalD. C.2009. A hydrogeophysical model of the relationship between geoelectric and hydraulic parameters of anisotropic aquifers. Hydrogeology Journal17, 495–503.
    [Google Scholar]
54. SlaterL.2007. Near surface electrical characterization of hydraulic conductivity: from petrophysical properties to aquifer geometries ‐ A review. Surveys in Geophysics28, 169–197.
    [Google Scholar]
55. SoupiosP.M., KouliM., ValianatosF., VafidisA. and StavroulakisG.2007. Estimation of aquifer hydraulic parameters from surficial geophysical methods: a case study of Keritis Basin in Chania (Crete‐Greece). Journal of Hydrology338, 122–131.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Taheri TizroA., VoudourisK. and BasamiY.2012. Estimation of porosity and specific yield by application of geoelectrical method – A case study in western Iran. Journal of Hydrology454–455, 160–172.
    [Google Scholar]
57. TheisC.V.1935The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage. Transactions American Geophysical Union16, 519–524.
    [Google Scholar]
58. UrishD.W.1981. Electrical resistivity‐hydraulic conductivity relationships in glacial outwash aquifers. Water Resources Research17, 1401–1408.
    [Google Scholar]
59. WildenschildD., RobertsJ.J., and CarlbergE.D.2000. On the relationship between microstructure and electrical and hydraulic properties of sand‐clay mixtures. Geophysical Research Letters27, 3085–3088.
    [Google Scholar]
60. WorthingtonP.F.1993. The uses and abuses of the Archie equations, 1: the formation factor‐porosity relationship. Journal of Applied Geophysics30, 215–228.
    [Google Scholar]
61. YehT.‐C. J. and LiuS.2000. Hydraulic tomography: development of a new aquifer test method. Water Resources Research36, 2095–2105.
    [Google Scholar]