An adaptive free‐surface expression for three‐dimensional finite‐difference frequency‐domain modelling of elastic wave

References

1. AkiK. and RichardsP.G.1980. Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods. I. W. H. Freeman and Company.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AltermanZ. and KaralF.1968. Propagation of elastic waves in layered median by finite differences methods. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America58, 367–398.
   [Google Scholar]
3. AltermanZ.S. and RotenbergA.1969. Seismic waves in a quarter plane. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America59, 347–368.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BohlenT. and SaengerE.H.2006. Accuracy of heterogeneous staggered‐grid finite‐difference modeling of Rayleigh waves. Geophysics71, T109–T115.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CaoJ., ChenJ.B. and DaiM.X.2016. Improved free‐surface expression for frequency‐domain elastic optimal mixed‐grid modeling. Journal of Applied Geophysics130, 71–80.
   [Google Scholar]
6. ChenJ.B. and CaoJ.2016. Modeling of frequency‐domain elastic‐wave equation with an average‐derivative optimal method. Geophysics81, T339–T356.
   [Google Scholar]
7. FichtnerA.2011. Full Seismic Waveform Modeling and Inversion. Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
8. GravesR.W.1996. Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3D elastic media using staggered‐grid finite differences. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America86, 1091–1106.
   [Google Scholar]
9. HustedtB., OpertoS. and VirieuxJ.2004. Mixed‐grid and staggered‐grid finite‐difference methods for frequency‐domain acoustic wave modelling. Geophysical Journal International by the Royal Astronomical Society157, 1269–1296.
   [Google Scholar]
10. IlanA., UngarA. and AltermanZ.1975. An improved representation of boundary conditions in finite difference schemes for seismological problems. Geophysical Journal International by the Royal Astronomical Society43, 727–745.
    [Google Scholar]
11. IlanA. and LoewenthalD.1976. Instability of finite difference schemes due to boundary conditions in elastic media. Geophysical Prospecting24, 431–453.
    [Google Scholar]
12. JoC.‐H., ShinC. and SuhJ.H.1996. An optimal 9‐point, finite‐difference, frequency‐space, 2‐D scalar wave extrapolator. Geophysics61, 529–537.
    [Google Scholar]
13. JohnsonL.R.1974. Greens function for Lamb's problem. Geophysical Journal International37, 99–131.
    [Google Scholar]
14. KellyK.R., WardR.W., TreitelS. and AlfordR.M.1976. Synthetic seismograms: a finite difference approach. Geophysics41, 12–27.
    [Google Scholar]
15. KristekJ., MoczoP. and ArchuletaR.2002. Efficient methods to simulate planar free‐surface in the 3D 4th‐order staggered‐grid finite‐difference schemes. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica46, 355–381.
    [Google Scholar]
16. LanH. and ZhangZ.2011. Comparative study of the free‐surface boundary condition in two‐dimensional finite‐difference elastic wave field simulation. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering8, 257–286.
    [Google Scholar]
17. LevanderA.R.1988. Fourth‐order finite‐difference P‐SV seismograms. Geophysics53, 1425–1436.
    [Google Scholar]
18. LiY., MétivierL., BrossierR., HanB. and VirieuxJ.2015. 2D and 3D frequency‐domain elastic wave modeling in complex media with a parallel iterative solver. Geophysics80, T101–T118.
    [Google Scholar]
19. MinD.‐J., ShinC., KwonB.‐D. and ChungS.2000. Improved frequency‐domain elastic wave modeling using weighted‐averaging difference operators. Geophysics65, 884–895.
    [Google Scholar]
20. MinD.‐J., ShinC. and YooH.S.2004. Free‐surface boundary condition in finite‐difference elastic wave modeling. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America94, 237–250.
    [Google Scholar]
21. MittetR.2002. Free‐surface boundary conditions for elastic staggered modeling schemes. Geophysics67, 1616–1623.
    [Google Scholar]
22. MoczoP., KristekJ., VavrycukV., ArchuletaR.J. and HaladaL.2002. 3D heterogeneous staggered‐grid finite‐difference modeling of seismic motion with volume harmonic and arithmetic averaging of elastic moduli and densities. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America92, 3042–3066.
    [Google Scholar]
23. MUMPUS
    MUMPUS2016. Multifrontal Massively Parallel Solver Users' Guide .
24. OpertoS., VirieuxJ., AmestoyP., L'ExcellentJ.‐Y., GiraudL. and AliH.B.H.2007. 3D finite‐difference frequency‐domain modeling of visco‐acoustic wave propagation using a massively parallel direct solver: a feasibility study. Geophysics72(5), SM195–SM211.
    [Google Scholar]
25. OpertoS., VirieuxJ., RibodettiA. and AndersonJ.E.2009. Finite‐difference frequency‐domain modeling of viscoacoustic wave propagation in 2D tilted transversely isotropic (TTI) media. Geophysics74, T75–T95.
    [Google Scholar]
26. ŠteklI. and PrattR.G.1998. Accurate viso‐elastic modeling by frequency‐domain finite difference using rotated operators. Geophysics63, 1779–1794.
    [Google Scholar]
27. VidaleJ.E. and ClaytonR.W.1986. A stable free‐surface boundary condition for two‐dimensional elastic finite‐difference wave simulation. Geophysics51, 2247–2249.
    [Google Scholar]
28. VirieuxJ.1984. SH‐wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity‐stress finite‐difference method. Geophysics49, 1933–1957.
    [Google Scholar]
29. VirieuxJ.1986. P‐SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity‐stress finite‐difference method. Geophysics51, 889–901.
    [Google Scholar]
30. WangS., de HoopM.V. and XiaJ.2011a. Massively parallel structured multifrontal solver for time harmonic elastic waves in 3‐D anisotropic media. Geophysical Prospecting59, 857–873.
    [Google Scholar]
31. WangS., LiX.S., XiaJ., SituY. and de HoopM.V.2011b. Efficient scalable algorithms for hierarchically semi‐separable matrices. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing.
    [Google Scholar]
32. WangS., de HoopM.V. and XiaJ. and LiX.S.2012a. Massively parallel structured multifrontal solver for time harmonic elastic waves in 3‐D anisotropic media. Geophysical Journal International191, 346–366.
    [Google Scholar]
33. WangS., XiaJ., de HoopM.V. and LiX.S.2012b. Massively parallel structured direct solver for equations describing time‐harmonic qP‐polarized waves in TTI media. Geophysics77, T69–T82.
    [Google Scholar]
34. XuY., XiaJ. and MillerR.D.2007. Numerical investigation of implementation of air‐earth boundary by acoustic‐elastic boundary approach. Geophysics72, SM147–SM153.
    [Google Scholar]
35. ZahradníkJ., MoczoP. and HronF.1993. Testing four elastic finite‐difference schemes for behavior at discontinuities. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America83, 107–129.
    [Google Scholar]