1887
Volume 67 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We built a five‐component (5C) land seismic sensor that measures both the three‐component (3C) particle acceleration and two vertical gradients of the horizontal wavefield through a pair of 3C microelectromechanical accelerometers. The sensor is a small cylindrical device planted vertically just below the earth's surface. We show that seismic acquisition and processing 5C sensor data has the potential to replace conventional seismic acquisition with analogue geophone groups by single 5C sensors placed at the same station interval when combined with a suitable aliased ground roll attenuation algorithm. The 5C sensor, therefore, allows for sparser, more efficient, data acquisition.

The accuracy of the 5C sensor wavefield gradients depends on the 3C accelerometers, their sensitivity, self‐noise and their separation. These sensor component specifications are derived from various modelling studies. The design principles of the 5C sensor are validated using test data from purpose‐built prototypes. The final prototype was constructed with a pair of 3C accelerometers separated by 20 cm and with a self‐noise of 35 ng Hz−1/2.

Results from a two‐dimensional seismic line show that the seismic image of 5C sensor data with ground roll attenuated using 5C sensor gradient data was comparable to simulated analogue group data as is the standard in the industry. This field example shows that up to three times aliased ground roll was attenuated. The 5C sensor also allows for correcting vertical component accelerometer data for sensor tilt. It is shown that a vertical component sensor that is misaligned with the vertical direction by 10° introduces an error in the seismic data of around –20 dB with respect to the seismic signal, which can be fully corrected. Advances in sensor specifications and processing algorithms are expected to lead to even more effective ground roll attenuation, enabling a reduction in the receiver density resulting in a smaller number of sensors that must be deployed and, therefore, improving the operational efficiency while maintaining image quality.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12716
2018-12-06
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AkiK. and RichardsP.1980. Quantitative Seismology. W.H. Freeman and Company: New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AlloucheN., RasP. and ÖzbekA.2015. Aliased Ground‐roll Reconstruction Using Gradients. Proceedings of the 77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
  3. BagainiC., Daly, M. and MooreI.2012. The acquisition and processing of distance‐separated dithered slip‐sweep vibroseis data. Geophysical Prospecting60, 618–639.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BarakO., HerkenhoffF., DashR., JaiswalP., GilesJ., de RidderS., et al. 2014. Six‐component seismic land data acquired with geophones and rotation sensors: wave‐mode selectivity by application of multicomponent polarization filtering. The Leading Edge33, 1224–1232.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BrokešováJ., Málek, J. and KolínskýP.2012. Rotaphone, a mechanical seismic sensor system for field rotation rate measurements and its in situ calibration. Journal of Seismology16, 603–621.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. EdmeP., MuyzertE. and KraghE.2014. Efficient land seismic acquisition sampling using rotational data. 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
  7. FrancoR. and MusacchioG.2001. Polarization filter with singular value decomposition. Geophysics66, 932–938.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Langston, C.2007. Spatial gradient analysis for linear seismic arrays. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America97, 265–280.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. NigborR.L., EvansJ.R. and HuttC.R.2009. Laboratory and field testing of commercial rotational seismometers. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America99, 1215–1227.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. PaulsonN, HusomV.A. and GoujonN.2015. A MEMS accelerometer for multicomponent streamers. 77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
  11. RobertssonJ. and MuyzertE.1999. Wavefield separation using a volume distribution of three component recordings. Geophysical Research Letters26, 2821–2824.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. RobertssonJ. and CurtisA.2002. Wavefield separation using densely deployed three‐component single‐sensor groups in land surface‐seismic recordings. Geophysics67, 1624–1633.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. SollbergerD., Schmelzbach Van RenterghemC.RobertssonJ. and GreenhalghS.2017. Automated six‐component, single‐station ground‐roll identification and suppression by combined processing of translational and rotational ground‐motion. 87th Annual International meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 5064–5068.
  14. VassalloM., ÖzbekA., ÖzdemirK. and EggenbergerK.2010Crossline wavefield reconstruction from multicomponent streamer data: part 1 Multichannel interpolation by matching pursuit (MIMAP) using pressure and its crossline gradient. Geophysics75, WB53–WB67.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. VermeerG.J.O.2012. 3D Seismic Survey Design. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. WoelzS., RabbelW. and MuellerC.2009. Shear waves in near surface 3D media–SH–wavefield separation, refraction time migration and tomography. Journal of Applied Geophysics68, 104–116.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12716
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12716
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Acquisition; Multicomponent; Seismics

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error