Preferential groundwater seepage in karst terrane inferred from geoelectric measurements

References

1. Archie, G.E.1942. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers46, 54–62.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Boléve, A., Revil, A., Janod, F., Mattiuzzo, J.L. and Jardani, A.2007. Forward modeling and validation of a new formulation to compute self‐potential signals associated with ground water flow. Hydrology and Earth Systems Sciences11, 1661–1671.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Briggs, M.A., Day‐Lewis, F.D., Ong, J.B., Harvey, J.W. and Lane, J.W.2014. Dual‐domain mass‐transfer parameters from electrical hysteresis—Theory and analytical approach applied to laboratory, synthetic streambed, and groundwater experiments. Water Resources Research50, 8281–8299.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cerepi, A., Cherubini, A., Garcia, B., Deschamps, H. and Revil, A.2017. Streaming potential coupling coefficient in unsaturated carbonate rocks. Geophysical Journal International210, 291–302.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Glover, P.W.J. and Déry, N.2010. Streaming potential coupling coefficient of quartz glass bead packs: dependence on grain diameter, pore size, and pore‐throat radius. Geophysics75, 225–241.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ikard, S.J., Revil, A., Jardani, A., Woodruff, W.F., Parekh, M. and Mooney, M.2012. Saline pulse test monitoring with the self‐potential method to non‐intrusively determine the velocity of the pore water in leaking areas of earth dams and embankments. Water Resources Research48, 1–17.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ikard, S.J. and Revil, A.2014. Self‐potential monitoring of a thermal pulse advecting through a preferential flow path. Journal of Hydrology519, 34–49.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ikard, S.J., Rittgers, J., Revil, A. and Mooney, M.2015. Geophysical investigation of seepage beneath an earthen dam. Groundwater53, 238–250.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Ikard, S.J. and Kress, W.2016. Electric‐hydraulic correlations in layered aquifers: a case study of the surficial aquifer of Emirate Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics21, 187–200.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ikard, S.J., Merrill, K., Pease, E.C.Carr, S.M. and Barnard, J.Q.2018a. 650‐m profiles of self‐potential, contact resistance, and electric resistance tomography measurements adjacent to Hamilton Creek, Burnet County, Texas, July 2017 ‐ January 2018. U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/F7VX0FSC.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ikard, S.J., Teeple, A.P., Payne, J.D., Stanton, G.S. and Banta, J.R.2018b. New insights on scale‐dependent surface and groundwater exchange from a floating self‐potential dipole. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics23, 261–287.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Jardani, A., Revil, A., Boléve, A., Dupont, J.P., Barrash, W. and Malama, B.2007. Tomography of the Darcy velocity from self‐potential measurements. Geophysical Research Letters34, 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Klimchouk, A.B.2004. Towards defining, delimiting, and classifying epikarst: its origin, processes and variants of geomorphic evolution. Speleogenesis and Evolution of Karst Aquifers2, 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
14. B.F
    Lange, A.L and Barner, W.L.1995. Application of the natural electrical field for detecting karst conduits on Guam. In: Karst Geohazards (ed B.F . Beck ), pp. 425–441. Rotterdam: Balkema.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Loke, M.H.2000. Electrical imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies: a practical guide to 2‐D and 3‐D surveys. Available at http://pages.mtu.edu/~ctyoung/LOKENOTE.PDF.
16. Manger, G.E.1963. Porosity and bulk density of sedimentary rocks. Contributions to Geochemistry. Washington D.C.: United States Government Printing Office.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Preston, R.D., Pavilcek, D.J., Bluntzer, R.L. and Derton, J.1996. The Paleozoic and related aquifers of central Texas. Texas Water Development Board Report 346.
18. Revil, A. and Leroy, P.2004. Constitutive equations for ionic transport in porous shales. Journal of Geophysical Research109, 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Revil, A., Karaoulis, M., Johnson, T. and Kemna, A.2012. Review: some low‐frequency electrical methods for subsurface characterization and monitoring in hydrogeology. Hydrogeology Journal20, 617–658.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Revil, A., Ahmed, A.S. and Jardani, A.2018. Self‐potential: a non‐intrusive ground water flow sensor. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics22, 235–247.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Ritter, D.F., Kochel, R.C. and Miller, J.R.2002. Process Geomorphology, 4th edn. New York: McGraw Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Robert, T., Dassargues, A., Brouyère, S., Kaufmann, O., Hallet, V. and Nguyen, F.2011. Assessing the contribution of electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and self‐potential (SP) for a water well drilling program in fractured/karstified limestones. Journal of Applied Geophysics75, 42–53.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Sheehan, J.R., Doll, W.E. and Mandell, W.A.2005. An evaluation of methods and available software for seismic refraction tomography analysis. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics10, 21–34.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Sheffer, M.W. and Oldenburg, D.W.2007. Three‐dimensional modeling of streaming potential. Geophysical Journal International169, 839–848.
    [Google Scholar]
25. R.E.Mace
    Smith, R.2004. 9: Paleozoic aquifers of the Llano Uplift. In: Texas Water Development Board Report 360 (eds R.E.Mace , E.S.Angle and W.F.MullicanIII ), pp. 181–199. Aquifers of the Edwards Plateau.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Šumanovac, F. and Weisser, M.2001. Evaluation of resistivity and seismic methods for hydrogeological mapping in karst terrains. Journal of Applied Geophysics47, 13–28.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Wanfang, Z., Beck, B.F. and Stephenson, J.B.1999. Investigation of groundwater flow in karst areas using component separation of natural potential measurement. Environmental Geology37, 19–25.
    [Google Scholar]
28. D.K.
    Zonge, K., Wynn, J. and Urquhart, S.2005. 9: Resistivity, induced polarization, and complex resistivity. In: Near Surface Geophysics (ed D.K. Butler ), pp. 265–300. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]