1887
Volume 67, Issue 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478
PDF

Abstract

ABSTRACT

A focussing function is a specially constructed field that focusses on to a purely downgoing pulse at a specified subsurface position upon injection into the medium. Such focussing functions are key ingredients in the Marchenko method and in its applications such as retrieving Green's functions, redatuming, imaging with multiples and synthesizing the response of virtual sources/receiver arrays at depth. In this study, we show how the focussing function and its corresponding focussed response at a specified subsurface position are heavily influenced by the aperture of the source/receiver array at the surface. We describe such effects by considering focussing functions in the context of time‐domain imaging, offering explicit connections between time processing and Marchenko focussing. In particular, we show that the focussed response radiates in the direction perpendicular to the line drawn from the centre of the surface data array aperture to the focussed position in the time‐imaging domain, that is, in time‐migration coordinates. The corresponding direction in the Cartesian domain follows from the sum (superposition) of the time‐domain direction and the directional change due to time‐to‐depth conversion. Therefore, the result from this study provides a better understanding of focussing functions and has implications in applications such as the construction of amplitude‐preserving redatuming and imaging, where the directional dependence of the focussed response plays a key role in controlling amplitude distortions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12735
2019-01-11
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/gpr/67/2/gpr12735.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12735&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. BrogginiF. and SniederR.2012. Connection of scattering principles: a visual and mathematical tour. European Journal of Physics33, 593–613.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CameronM.K., FomelS. and SethianJ.A.2007. Seismic velocity estimation from time migration. Inverse Problems23, 1329–1369.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. FomelS.2013. Wave‐equation time migration. 83rd annual meeting, SEG Technical Program 2013 Expanded Abstracts. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 3703–3708.
  4. HubralP.1977. Time migration – some ray theoretical aspects. Geophysical Prospecting25, 738–745.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. LiS. and FomelS.2015. A robust approach to time‐to‐depth conversion and interval velocity estimation from time migration in the presence of lateral velocity variation. Geophysical Prospecting63, 315–337.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. RavasiM.2017. Rayleigh–Marchenko redatuming for target‐oriented, true‐amplitude imaging. Geophysics82, S439–S452.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. SinghS., SniederR., van der NeutJ., ThorbeckeJ., SlobE. and WapenaarK.2017. Accounting for free‐surface multiples in Marchenko imaging. Geophysics82, R19–R30.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. SlobE., WapenaarK., BrogginiF. and SniederR.2014. Seismic reflector imaging using internal multiples with Marchenko‐type equations. Geophysics79, S63–S76.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. SripanichY. and FomelS.2018. Fast time‐to‐depth conversion and interval velocity estimation in the case of weak lateral variations. Geophysics83, S227–S235.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. SripanichY., VasconcelosI., WapenaarK. and TrampertJ.2018. Velocity‐independent Marchenko method in time‐ and depth imaging domains. 88th annual meeting, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 5012–5016.
  11. ThomsonC.J., KitchensideP.W. and FletcherR.P.2016. Theory of reflectivity blurring in seismic depth imaging. Geophysical Journal International205, 837–855.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ThorbeckeJ.1997. Common focus point technology . PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.
  13. ThorbeckeJ., SlobE., BrackenhoffJ., van der NeutJ. and WapenaarK.2017. Implementation of the Marchenko method. Geophysics82, WB29–WB45.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. van der NeutJ., VasconcelosI. and WapenaarK.2015. On Green's function retrieval by iterative substitution of the coupled Marchenko equations. Geophysical Journal International203, 792–813.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. VasconcelosI., WapenaarK., van der NeutJ., ThomsonC. and RavasiM.2015. Using inverse transmission matrices for Marchenko redatuming in highly complex media. 85th annual meeting, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2015. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 5081–5086.
  16. WapenaarK. and GrimbergenJ.1996. Reciprocity theorems for one‐way wavefields. Geophysical Journal International127, 169–177.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. WapenaarK., ThorbeckeJ., van der NeutJ., BrogginiF., SlobE. and SniederR.2014a. Green's function retrieval from reflection data, in absence of a receiver at the virtual source position. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America135, 2847–2861.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. WapenaarK., ThorbeckeJ., van der NeutJ., BrogginiF., SlobE. and SniederR.2014b. Marchenko imaging. Geophysics79, WA39–WA57.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. WapenaarK., ThorbeckeJ., van der NeutJ., SlobE. and SniederR.2017. Review paper. Virtual sources and their responses. Part II: data‐driven single‐sided focusing. Geophysical Prospecting65, 1430–1451.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. YilmazO.2001. Seismic Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12735
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12735
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Focussing function; Time imaging; Virtual source

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error