1887

Abstract

Summary

The argillaceous nature of unconventional gas reservoirs presents ultra-complex lithology, nano-scale porosity and permeability. Petrophysical and mineralogical evaluation of these formations challenge high resolution diversified evaluation techniques to investigate first the dual storage mechanisms of natural gas and later to help in designing hydraulic fracturing techniques for maximum recovery of gas. Research work and contents in this paper are intended to develop some insight about post depositional diagenetic events in shale gas formations which have direct impact on brine evaluation in these types of overly clay rich reservoirs. Insights will help in understanding, reasons of uncertainties and doubts about controversial application of true formation resistivity (Rt) values from resistivity wireline logs in seconds Archie’s (1942) Equation in shale gas reservoir. Direct evaluation and assessment of porosity in shale is not reliable from wire-line logs alone; thus, it is essential that logs be calibrated with lab direct measurements such as QEMSCAN, XRD, and FIB/SEM. In the following sections, the geological background of study area is first discussed followed by our literature review and methodology used to determine different parameters for water saturation evaluation. Results are presented with the sensitivity study of different parameters. Some conclusive results are given at the end.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201803266
2018-12-03
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmad, M. and Haghighi, M.
    2012. Mineralogy and Petrophysical Evaluation of Roseneath and Murteree Shale Formations, Cooper Basin, Australia Using QEMSCAN and CT-Scanning. Presented in SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in Perth, 22–24 October 2012, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmad, M., A.Alamar, R.Koo, H.Nguyen, Haghighi, M.
    2012. Evaluation of Free Porosity in Shale Gas Reservoirs (Roseneath and Murteree Formations Case Study), APPEA Journal, 603–610.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmad, M. and Haghighi, M.
    2013. “Water Saturation Evaluation of Roseneath and Murteree Shale Gas Reservoirs, Cooper Basin, Australia Using Wireline Logs, Focused Ion Beam Milling and Scanning Electron Microscopy”. SPE Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition Asia –Pacific held in Brisbane11–13 November 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Amiri, M., Yunan, M. H., Zahedi, G., Jaafar, M. Z. and Oyinloye, E.
    2012. Introducing New Method to Improve Log Derived Saturation Estimation in Tight Shaly Sandstones-A Case Study from Mesaverde Tight Gas Reservoir. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering92, 132–142.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ArchieG.E
    1942. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transaction AIME, 146(54), 1942.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Asquith, George B.
    1990. Log Evaluation of Shaly Sandstones: A practical Guide. Published by The American Association of Petroleum GoelogistTulsa Oklahoma USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Baker, S. and P. J.Bare
    . 2011. Australia Oil & Gas, Shale Gas, Grab a Surfboard, Research Report, published by Hong Kong, Morgan Stanley Asia/Pacific. http://www.barakaenergy.com.au/pdfs/2011-06-17-020537Morgan
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bardon, C., and Pied, B.
    1969. Formation water saturation in shaly sands. In SPWLA 10th Annual Logging Symposium. Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheng, A. L. and Huang, W. L.
    2004. Selective Adsorption of Hydrocarbon Gases on Clays and Organic Matter. Organic geochemistry, 35(4), 413–423.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Clavier, C., W.R.Hoyle and D.Meuniere
    1971. Quantitative Interpretation of TOT log: Part 1 and 2, Journal of Petroleum Technology6, 743–763. Colorado. D.W. Hilchie’s. Inc. USA
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Clavier, C., Coates, G. and Domanoir, J.
    , 1977. The theoretical and Experimental basis for the “dual water” model for the interpretation of of shaly sands. Soc.Pet. Eng. AIME, Pap. 6859
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fertl, Walter H.
    1987. Log-derived evaluation of shaly clastic reservoirs.” Journal of petroleum technology39.02 (1987): 175–194.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fertl, W.H. and Hammack, C.W.
    1971. A Comparative Look at Water Saturation in Shaly Pay Sand. In 12th Annual Logging Symposium Transaction: Society of Professional Logging Analysts, SPWL12 October 1971.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fitts, T. G., and L. L.Summa
    . 2002. The relationship of the smectite-illite conversion to pore water salinity trends, deep water offshore Niger Delta. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, vol. 1, p. 0801. 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Foscolos, A. E.
    1990. Catagenesis of argillaceous sedimentary rocks. Diagenesis: Ottawa, Geoscience Canada, Re-print Series4 (1990): 177–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gravestock, D. I., Hibburt, J.E. and Drexel, J.F.
    (Eds), 1988. The Petroleum Geology of South Australia. D. O. P. I. A. Resources, Adelaide, Department of Primary Industries and Resources volume, 4.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gravestock, D. I., Alexander, E. M., Morton, J. G. G. and Sun, X.
    (1998). Reservoirs & Seals, Department of Primary Industries and Resources volume, 4.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Handwerger, D., Keller, J., Vaughn, K., and Keller, J.
    2011. Improved Petrophysical Core Measurements on Tight Shale Reservoirs Using Retort and Crushed Samples. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition in Denver Colorado USA, 30 October-2 November.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hilchie, D.S.
    1982. Applied Open Hole Log Interpretation for Geologist and Engineers: Douglas W. Hilchie Inc., Golden Colorado, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hill, A.J. and Gravestock, D.I.
    , (1995).”Cooper Basin. In, Drexel, J.F. and Preiss, W.V. (eds.), The Geology of South Australia. Vol. 2, The Phanerozoic. South Australian Geological Survey Bulletin, 54, 78–87
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Horseman, S. T., J. J. W.Higgo, J.Alexander, and J. F.Harrington
    . 1996. Water, Gas and Solute Movement through Argillaceous Media. Nuclear Energy Agency Rep. CC-96/1. OECD, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kuuskraa, V.
    2011. World shale gas resources: an initial assessment of 14 regions outside the United States, Energy Information Administration. Pblished by Adavance Resources International, Inc. USA
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lindsay, J. F.
    (2000). “Source Rock Potential and Algal-Matter Abundance, Cooper Basin.” South Australia. PIRSA Report Book, 32.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Morton, J.G.G.
    1990. Cooper Basin Core and log analysis for gas reserves assessment. National Energy Research Development and Demonstration Programmed Project 1030: http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/data/assets/pdf_file/0007/27349/v
    [Google Scholar]
  25. North, F. K.
    1985. Petroleum geology. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Passey, Q.R., K. M.,Bohacs, W.L.Esch, R.Klimentidis and S.Sinha
    . 2010. From Oil-Prone Source Rock to Gas-Producing Shale Reservoir-Geologic and Petrophysical Characterization of Unconventional hale Gas Reservoirs. International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition8–10 June, China.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. IRSA1972 - Primary Industries And Resources South Australia
    IRSA1972 - Primary Industries And Resources South Australia, PEL 5 & 6 Nappacoongee- Murteree Block, Cooper and Eromanga Basins, Della#4 Well Completion Report, Open File Envelope No. 2047, submitted by Delhi Petroleum Pty Ltd. Adelaide, 1972.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. IRSA 2011 - Primary Industries And Resources South Australia
    IRSA 2011 - Primary Industries And Resources South Australia, PEL 218 South Australia, Cooper & Eromanga Basins, Encounter-1 Well Completion Report, submitted by Beach Energy LimitedAdelaide, July 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Poupon, A. and Leveaux, J.
    1971. Evaluation of Water Saturation in Shaly Formations, Trans. SPWLA 12th Annual Logging Symposium, 1971, pp.1–2.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Wireline, Schlumberger Testing
    Wireline, Schlumberger Testing. 1989. Log interpretation principles/applications. Schlumberger Wireline & Testing, Sugarland, TX.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Schlumberger
    Schlumberger1975. Log interpretation, Principles, Schlumberger Ltd, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Simandoux, P.
    1963. Dielectric Measurements in Porous Media and Application to Shaly Formation, Revue del’Institut Francais du Petrole, Supplementary Issue, 1963, pp.193–215. (Translated text in SPWLA Reprint Volume Shaly Sand, July 1982)
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sondergeld, Carl, RaymondAmbrose, ChandraRai, and JasonMoncrieff
    2010. Micro-structural studies of gas shales. In SPE Unconventional Gas Conference, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, USA, 23–25 February 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Steiber, R. G.
    1973. Optimization of shale volumes in open hole logs. Journal of Petroleum Technology31 (1973): 147–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Thyberg, B., Jahren, J., Winje, T., Bjørlykke, K., & Faleide, J. I.
    2009. From mud to shale: Rock stiffening by micro-quartz cementation. First Break, 27(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Well Completion Report Antechamber-1
    Well Completion Report Antechamber-1PRL-129 (ex PEL 106) South Australia June 2015Beach Energy LimitedSouth Australia
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Well Completion Report Moomba-175
    Well Completion Report Moomba-175 October 2006Santos Delhi OriginSouth Australia
  38. Worthington, P.
    2011. The Petrophysics of Problematic Reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Technology63(12) 88–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. WyllieM.R.J.
    1963. The Fundamentals of Well Log Interpretation. Third Edition, Academic PressNew York and London.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wyllie, M. R. J., A. R.Gregory, and G. H. F.Gardner
    . 1958. An experimental investigation of factors affecting elastic wave velocities in porous media. Geophysics23.3 (1958): 459–493.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201803266
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201803266
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error