Quantitative Evaluation Of Shale Pore Connectivity Using Spontaneous Imbibition And Mercury Intrusion Capillary Pressure Methods

References

1. EpsteinN.
   On tortuosity and the tortuosity factor in flow and diffusion through porous media. Chemical and Engineering Science, 1989, 44(3): 777–779.
   [Google Scholar]
2. HagerJ.
   Steam drying of porous media. Sweden: Lund University, 1998.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Hu, Q., Ewing, R.P., Dultz, S.
   Low pore connectivity in natural rock, Journal of contaminant hydrology, 2012, 133, 76–83.
   [Google Scholar]
4. HuQ., EwingR.P., RoweH.D.
   Low nanopore connectivity limits gas production in Barnett formation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2015, 120, 8073–8087.
   [Google Scholar]
5. KatzA.J., ThompsonA.H.
   Prediction of rock electrical conductivity from mercury injection measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1987, 92(B1), 599–607.
   [Google Scholar]
6. KatzA.J., ThompsonA.H.
   Quantitative prediction of permeability in porous rock. Physical Review B, 1986, 34, 8179.
   [Google Scholar]
7. KlaverJ., DesboisG., LittkeR., UraiJ.L.
   BIB-SEM characterization of pore space morphology and distribution in postmature to overmature samples from the Haynesville and Bossier Shales. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2015, 59, 451–466.
   [Google Scholar]
8. WangY., PuJ., WangL.H., WangJ.Q., JiangZ., SongY.F., WangC.C., WangY.F., JinC.
   Characterization of typical 3D pore networks of Jiulaodong formation shale using nano- transmission X-ray microscopy. Fuel, 2016, 170, 84–91.
   [Google Scholar]
9. WebbP.A.
   An introduction to the physical characterization of materials by mercury intrusion porosimetry with emphasis on reduction and presentation of experimental data. Norcross: Micromeritics Instrument Corp., 2001.
   [Google Scholar]