1887

Abstract

Summary

Time-frequency localization has a wide range of application in geophysics. In seismic stratigraphic interpretation, high-resolution spectrogram have uses both for reservoirs that lie below and above the seismic resolution limits. In case of the reservoir where the thickness is greater than tuning thickness, high-resolution spectral decomposition provides an indicator of the area of interest, whereas, in case of thin-bed reservoirs, advance spectral decomposition helps to remove the tuning effects and improved frequency-dependent AVO analysis. Commonly methods help to enhance the resolution, visualize structural and stratigraphic features, estimate thin bed thickness, spectral balancing as well as direct hydrocarbon indication (Burnett et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2008; Xiaoyang et al., 2014). In the paper, we present a new modification to the Modified Stockwell transform (MST)(Li et al., 2016), and incorporate both the benefits of MST and Gabor decomposition into a single algorithm. By doing so the robustness of MST is improved for small window size. We named this algorithm MST2. The MST2, is perfectly reconstructable which leads to high time-frequency signal processing for better reservoir characterization. We compared the MST2 algorithm with MST, Gabor decomposition, and Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) for its time-frequency localization and characterization. In the example shown in this paper, we also demonstrate the use of MST2 usage for improved structural visualization.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201803295
2018-12-03
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Burnett, M. D., J. P.Castagna, E.Méndez-Hernández, G. Z.Rodríguez, L. F.García, J. T. M.Vázquez, M. T.Avilés, and R. V.Villaseñor
    , 2003, Application of spectral decomposition to gas basins in Mexico: The Leading Edge, 22, no. 11, 1130–1134, doi:10.1190/1.1634918.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1634918 [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen, G., G.Matteucci, B.Fahmy, and C.Finn
    , 2008, Spectral-decomposition response to reservoir fluids from a deepwater West Africa reservoir: GEOPHYSICS, 73, no. 6, C23–C30, doi:10.1190/1.2978337.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2978337 [Google Scholar]
  3. Li, D., J.Castagna, and G.Goloshubin
    , 2016, Investigation of generalized S-transform analysis windows for time-frequency analysis of seismic reflection data: GEOPHYSICS, 81, no. 3, V235–V247, doi:10.1190/geo2015‑0551.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0551.1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Mansinha, L., R.G.Stockwell, and R. P.Lowe
    , 1997, Pattern analysis with two-dimensional spectral localisation: Applications of two-dimensional S transforms: Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 239, 286–295, doi:10.1016/S0378‑4371(96)00487‑6.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(96)00487-6 [Google Scholar]
  5. Sinha, S., P. S.Routh, P. D.Anno, and J. P.Castagna
    , 2005, Spectral decomposition of seismic data with continuous-wavelet transform: Geophysics, 70, no. 6, P19–P25.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Wu, L., and J.Castagna
    , 2017, S-transform and Fourier transform frequency spectra of broadband seismic signals: GEOPHYSICS, 82, no. 5, O71–O81, doi:10.1190/geo2016‑0679.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0679.1 [Google Scholar]
  7. Xiaoyang, W., C.Mark, L.Xiang-Yang, and B.Patrick
    , 2014, Quantitative gas saturation estimation by frequency-dependent amplitude-versus-offset analysis: Geophysical Prospecting, 62, no. 6, 1224–1237, doi:10.1111/1365‑2478.12179.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12179 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201803295
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201803295
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error