1887

Abstract

Summary

In preferential oil-wet porous media, water flooding laboratory experiments are prone to capillary end effects. The wetting oil phase will tend to accumulate at the outlet where the capillary pressure is zero and leavea high remaining oil saturation at steady state (defined by stable pressure drop and zero oil production rate) compared to the residual oil saturation. derived analytical solutions describing how capillary pressure and relative permeabilityof water (the injected phase) could be determined based on pressure drop and average saturation at steady states obtained at different water injection rates. Plotting these values against inverse rate reveal linear trends at high rates, with slopes and interceptsthat directly quantify the saturation functions in the range of negative capillary pressures. The method is similar to intercept theory, but quantifies entire functions rather than a single point and provides the trends also at lowrates, thus utilizing all the information.

Our aim is to demonstrate how pressure drop and oil production at steady state for different water injection rates can be used to derive relative permeability and capillary pressure from water flooding. This is done inthree ways. First, synthetic waterflooding tests are generated (using the commercial software Sendra) applying the same saturation function correlations as assumed in the analytical solution. Then, more general correlations are assumed when generating thesynthetical data with Sendra. This , to test the robustness of the analytical solution of producing similar functions as the ‘true’ ones. Finally, we perform a waterflooding experiment in the lab on a high permeability (3 Darcy) Bentheimer sandstone core, alteredoil-wet using Quilon solution. The core was saturated with ~90 % n-decane oil and ~10 % brine. Spontaneous imbibition yielded << 1 % recovery. Forced imbibition of brine followed, starting from 0.4 PV/d, then increased stepwise after approaching steady stateuntil 12 rates had been applied, varied overall by a factor ~ 1000 to yield states governed by capillary forces and states governed by advective forces. The results were interpreted using both Sendra and the analytical solution.

The experimental procedure and model demonstrate that only water relative permeability and capillary pressure determine the steady state during water flooding and hence can be estimated accurately. The analytical solutioncould match the trends and magnitude simultaneously of steady state pressure drop and production with injection rate to give an estimation of the saturation functions. The estimates were as good as full history matching.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900089
2019-04-08
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abeysinghe, K. P., Fjelde, I., Lohne, A.
    (2012). Dependency of remaining oil saturation on wettability and capillary number. In SPE Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium and Exhibition.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Abrams, A.
    (1975). The influence of fluid viscosity, interfacial tension, and flow velocity on residual oil saturation left by waterflood. SPE Journal, 15(5), 437–447.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Amott, E.
    (1959). Observations relating to the wettability of porous rock. Petroleum Transactions AIME, 216, 156–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Andersen, P. Ø., Standnes, D. C., Skjæveland, S. M.
    (2017a). Waterflooding oil-saturated core samples-Analytical solutions for steady-state capillary end effects and correction of residual saturation. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 157, 364–379.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Andersen, P. Ø., Skjæveland, S. M., Standnes, D. C.
    (2017b). A Novel Bounded Capillary Pressure Correlation with Application to Both Mixed and Strongly Wetted Porous Media. In SPE Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2017c). An Analytical Model for Analysis of Capillary Pressure Measurements by Centrifuge. Petrophysics, 58(4), 366–375.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Andersen, P. Ø.
    (2018). Capillary Pressure Effects on Estimating the EOR Potential during Low Salinity and Smart Water Flooding. In SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Andersen, P. Ø., Brattekås, B., Nødland, O., Lohne, A., Føyen, T. L., Fernø, M. A.
    (2018a). Darcy-Scale Simulation of Boundary-Condition Effects During Capillary-Dominated Flow in High-Permeability Systems. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering (in press).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Andersen, P. Ø., Lohne, A., Stavland, A., Hiorth, A., Brattekås, B.
    (2018b). Core Scale Simulation of Spontaneous Solvent Imbibition from HPAM Gel. In SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Anderson, W. G.
    (1987). Wettability literature survey–Part 4: Effects of wettability on capillary pressure. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 39(10), 1283–1300.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Askarinezhad, R., Hatzignatiou, D. G., Stavland, A.
    (2017). Disproportionate Permeability Reduction of Water-Soluble Silicate Gelants: Importance of Formation Wettability. SPE Production & Operations, 32(3), 362–373.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Askarinezhad, R., Hatzignatiou, D., Stavland, A.
    (2018). Core-Based Evaluation of Associative Polymers as Enhanced Oil Recovery Agents in Oil-Wet Formations. ASME Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 140(3), 032915-032915-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bear, J.
    (1972). Dynamics of fluids in porous materials. Society of Petroleum Engineers: Dallas, TX, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Brooks, R. H., Corey, A. T.
    (1966). Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, 92(2), 61–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Buckley, S. E., Leverett, M.
    (1942). Mechanism of fluid displacement in sands. Transactions of the AIME, 146(01), 107–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, A. L., Wood, A. C.
    (2001). Rate effects on water-oil relative permeability. In The International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Edinburgh, Scotland.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen, Z., Huan, G., Ma, Y.
    (2006). Computational methods for multiphase flows in porous media (Vol. 2). SIAM.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gupta, R., Maloney, D. R.
    (2016). Intercept Method - A Novel Technique To Correct Steady-State Relative Permeability Data for Capillary End Effects. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 19(02), 316–330.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hadley, G. F., & Handy, L. L.
    (1956). A theoretical and experimental study of the steady state capillary end effect. In Fall Meeting of the Petroleum Branch of AIME.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hassler, G. L., & Brunner, E.
    (1945). Measurement of capillary pressures in small core samples. Transactions of the AIME, 160(1), 114–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hassler, G. L., Brunner, E., & Deahl, T. J.
    (1944). The role of capillarity in oil production. Transactions of the AIME, 155(1), 155–174.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Honarpour, M., Mahmood, S. M.
    (1988). Relative-permeability measurements: An overview. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 40(8), 963–966.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson, E. F., Bossler, D. P., & Bossler, V. O.
    (1959). Calculation of relative permeability from displacement experiments. Petroleum Transactions, AIME, 216, 370–372.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Leverett, M.
    (1941). Capillary behavior in porous solids. Transactions of the AIME, 142(1), 152–169.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Leverett, M., & Lewis, W. B.
    (1941). Steady flow of gas-oil-water mixtures through unconsolidated sands. Transactions of the AIME, 142(1), 107–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Maini, B. B., Ionescu, E., & Batycky, J. P.
    (1986). Miscible displacement of residual oil-effect of wettability on dispersion in porous media. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 25(03).
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Masalmeh, S. K.
    (2001). Experimental measurements of capillary pressure and relative permeability hysteresis. In The International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Edinburgh, Scotland.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Osoba, J. S., Richardson, J. G., Kerver, J. K., Hafford, J. A., Blair, P. M.
    (1951). Laboratory measurements of relative permeability. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 3(2), 47–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Peksa, A. E., Wolf, K. H. A., Zitha, P. L.
    (2015). Bentheimer sandstone revisited for experimental purposes. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 67, 701–719.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Purcell, W. R.
    (1949). Capillary pressures-their measurement using mercury and the calculation of permeability therefrom. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1(2), 39–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Quilon data sheet. www.zaclon.com/pdf/quilon_datasheet.pdf accessed on June2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Rapoport, L. A., Leas, W. J.
    (1953). Properties of linear waterfloods. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 5(5), 139–148.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Reed, J., Maas, J
    (2018). Review of the intercept method for relative permeability correction using a variety of case study data. In The International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Trondheim, Norway.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Richardson, J. G., Kerver, J. K., Hafford, J. A., Osoba, J. S.
    (1952). Laboratory determination of relative permeability. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 4(8), 187–196.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Skjæveland, S. M., Siqveland, L. M., Kjosavik, A., Thomas, W. L., Virnovsky, G. A.
    (2000). Capillary Pressure Correlation for Mixed-Wet Reservoirs. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 3(1), 60–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tiffin, D. L., Yellig, W. F.
    (1983). Effects of mobile water on multiple-contact miscible gas displacements. SPE Journal, 23(03), 447–455.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Virnovsky, G. A., Skjæveland, S. M., Surdal, J., Ingsoy, P.
    (1995). Steady-state relative permeability measurements corrected for capillary effects. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Virnovsky, G. A., Vatne, K. O., Skjaeveland, S. M., Lohne, A.
    (1998). Implementation of Multirate Technique to Measure Relative Permeabilities Accounting for Capillary Effects. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Zeppieri, S., Rodríguez, J., López de Ramos, A. L.
    (2001). Interfacial tension of alkane+ water systems. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 46(5), 1086–1088.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wen, B., Sun, C., Bai, B., Gatapova, E. Y., Kabov, O. A.
    (2017). Ionic hydration-induced evolution of decane–water interfacial tension. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 19(22), 14606–14614.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900089
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900089
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error