1887

Abstract

Summary

Since the 1980s experimental and field studies have found anomalously slow propagation of foam that cannot be explained by surfactant adsorption. conducted foam-propagation experiments in a cone-shaped sandpack and concluded that foam, once formed in the narrow inlet, was unable to propagate at all at lower superficial velocities towards the wider outlet. They hence concluded that long-distance foam propagation in radial flow from an injection well is in doubt.

provide a theoretical explanation for slower or non-propagation of foam at decreasing superficial velocity. Their explanation connects foam propagation to the minimum velocity or pressure gradient required for foam generation in homogeneous porous media ( ). The conditions for propagation of foam are less demanding than those for creation of new foam. However, there still can be a minimum superficial velocity necessary for propagation of foam, except that it could be significantly smaller than the minimum velocity for foam generation from an initial state of no-foam. At even lower superficial velocity, theory ( ) predicts a collapse of foam.

In this study, we extend the experimental approach of Friedmann et al. in the context of the theory of Ashoori et al. We use a cylindrical core with stepwise increasing diameters such that the superficial velocity in the outlet section is 1/16 of that in the inlet. N2 foam is created and stabilized by an alpha olefin sulfonate surfactant. Previously ( ), we mapped the conditions for foam generation in a Bentheimer sandstone core as a function of total superficial velocity, surfactant concentration and injected gas fraction (foam quality). In this study, we extend the map to include the conditions for propagation of foam, after its creation in the narrow inlet section at greater superficial velocity. Thereafter, by reducing superficial velocity, we map the conditions for foam collapse.

Our results suggest that the minimum superficial velocities for foam generation, propagation and maintenance increase with increasing foam quality and decreasing surfactant concentration, in agreement with theory. The minimum velocity for propagation of foam is much less than that for foam generation, and that for foam maintenance is less than that for propagation. The implications of our lab results for field application of foam are discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900108
2019-04-08
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ashoori, E.; Marchesin, D.; and Rossen, W.R.
    : Multiple Foam States and Long-Distance Foam Propagation in Porous Media. 2012, SPE Journal17, 1231–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Apaydin, O.G. and Kovscek, A.R.
    : Surfactant Concentration and End Effects on Foam Flow in Porous Media. 2001, Transport in Porous Media43, 511–536.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baghdikian, S. and Handy, L.L.
    : Flow of Foaming Solutions in Porous Media. 1990. Modification of Chemical and Physical Factors in Steam-flood to Increase Heavy Oil Recovery. Yortsos, Y.C., U. S. Dept. Energy Ann. Rep., DOE/BC/14126‑14, Bartlesville, OK.
    https://doi.org/DOE/BC/14126-14 [Google Scholar]
  4. Burman, J.W. and Hall, B.E.
    : Foam Diverting Technique Improved Sandstone Acid Jobs. Proc., World Pet. Cong., New Orleans (1987).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Falls, A. H. Hirasaki, G. J., Patzek, T. W., Gauglitz, D. A., Miller, D. D., and Raulowski, T.
    : Development of a Mechanistic Foam Simulator: The Population Balance and Generation by Snap-Off. 1988, SPERE3, 884–892.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Friedmann, F.; Chen, W.H.; Gauglitz, P.A.
    : Experimental and simulation study of high-temperature foam displacement in porous media. 1991, SPERE6(1), 37–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Friedmann, F.; Smith, M.E.; Guice, W.R.; Gump, J.M.; NelsonD.G.
    Steam-foam mechanistic field trial in the midway-sunset field. 1994, SPERE9(4), 297–304.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gauglitz, P.A.; Friedmann, F.; Kam, S.I. and Rossen, W.R.
    : Foam Generation in Homogeneous Porous Media. 2002. Chem. Eng. Sci.57, 4037–4052.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hirasaki, G.; Miller, C.; Szafranski, R.; Tanzil, D.; Lawson, J.B.; Meinardus, H.; Jin, M.; Londergan, J.T.; Jackson, R.; Pope, G.A.; Wade, W.H.
    : “Field Demonstration of the Surfactant/Foam Process for Aquifer Remediation.”1997. DOI:10.2523/39292‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2523/39292-MS [Google Scholar]
  10. Jones, S. A.; Laskaris, G.; Vincent-Bonnieu, S.; Farajzadeh, R. and Rossen, W. R.
    Effect of Surfactant Concentration on Foam: From Coreflood Experiments to Implicit-Texture Foam-Model Parameters. 2016, J. Ind. & Eng. Chem.37, 268–276
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kam, S.I. and Rossen, W.R.
    A Model for Foam Generation in Homogeneous Media. 2003, SPE J.8(4): 417–42,. SPE-87334-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kam, S.I.; Nguyen, Q.P.; Li,Q. and Rossen, W.R.
    Dynamic Simulations With an Improved Model for Foam Generation. 2007, SPE35–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. KamS.I.
    Improved Mechanistic Foam Simulation with Foam Catastrophe Theory. 2008, Colloids Surf., A 318(1–3): 62–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kennedy, J.W.; Kitziger, F.W.; and Hall, B.E.
    : Case Study on the Effectiveness of Nitrogen Foams and Water-Zone Diverting Agents in Multistage Matrix Acid Treatments. SPEPE (May1992) 203.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Khatib, Z.R.; Hirasaki, G.J. and Falls, A.H.
    Effects of Capillary Pressure on Coalescence and Phase Mobilities in Foams Flowing Through Porous Media. 1988, SPE Res Eng3 (3): 919–926. SPE-15442-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Nguyen, Q. P.; Currie, P. K. and Zitha, P. L. J.
    Determination of Foam Induced Fluid Partitioning in Porous Media Using X-Ray Computed Tomography. 2003, Paper SPE80245 presented at the International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, TX, USA, 5–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Patzek, T. W.
    : Field Applications of Steam Foam for Mobility Improvement and Profile Control. 1996. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/29612‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/29612-PA [Google Scholar]
  18. Ransohoff, T.C. and Radke, C.J.
    Mechanics of Foam Generation in Glass Bead Packs. 1988, Soc. Pet. Eng. Reservoir Eng., 3, 573.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Rossen, W.R. and Gauglitz, P.A.
    Percolation Theory of Creation and Mobilization of Foams in Porous Media. 1990, AIChE J. Vol. 36, No. 8.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. RossenW.R.
    Foams in Enhanced Oil Recovery. In: Prud'homme, R.K., Khan, S. (Eds.), Foams: Theory Measurement and Applications. 1996, Marcel Dekker, New York City.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Simjoo, M. and Zitha, P. L.
    J. Effects of Oil on Foam Generation and Propagation in Porous Media. 2013, Paper SPE 165271 presented at the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Yu, G., Rossen, W. R., and Vincent-Bonnieu, S.
    , Coreflood Study of Effect of Surfactant Concentration on Foam Generation in Porous Media. 2019, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 58, 1, 420–427
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900108
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900108
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error