1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. IOR 2019 – 20th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

Foam is able to increase gas's sweep efficiency in Enhanced-Oil-Recovery applications. A surfactant-alternating-gas, or SAG, process is usually preferred for placing foam in the reservoir. During a SAG process, foam is generated away from the wellbore, offering both good injectivity and good mobility control at the leading edge of the foam bank.

Scale-up of laboratory data for SAG to field applications remains a challenge. Direct scale-up of dynamic SAG coreflood results is unreliable because of the dominance of core-scale artifacts. Steady-state coreflood data can be scaled up using fractional-flow theory ( ; Rossen and Boeije, 2015). However, about half the published laboratory studies of foam fractional-flow curves report non-monotonic behavior, where at some point liquid saturation Sw increases with decreasing liquid fractional flow fw. warn that such behavior would result in foam collapse during injection of the gas slug in a SAG process at the field scale. Here we report and analyse a series of steady-state and dynamic coreflood experiments to investigate the occurrence of non-monotonic fractional-flow behavior. These corefloods vary surfactant concentration, injected gas fraction (foam quality) and total superficial velocity and are supported by CT measurements. The CT data confirm that in these cases, as foam weakens with decreasing fw, liquid saturation increases, confirming the non-monotonic fw(Sw) behaviour.

In our results, every case of non-monotonic fractional-flow behavior begins with propagation of foam from the inlet, followed by eruption of a much-stronger foam at the outlet of the core and backwards propagation of the stronger foam state to the inlet, similar to behavior reported by and . This suggests that there may be more than one stable local-equilibrium (LE) foam state. The initial creation of the stronger foam near the outlet is at least in part due to the capillary end effect. It is thus not clear which LE foam state controls behaviour in a SAG process in the field.

In our results, the subsequent transition from a stronger- to a weaker-foam state, leading to non-monotonic fw(Sw) behavior, coincides with conditions for weaker foam (lower surfactant concentration, lower fw) and less-vigorous foam generation (lower superficial velocity); this agrees with the theory of foam propagation of . We discuss the implications of these findings, if confirmed to apply generally, for design of SAG foam processes.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900109
2019-04-08
2024-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900109
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al Ayesh, A. H., Salazar, R., Farajzadeh, R., Vincent-Bonnieu, S., and Rossen, W. R.
    , “Foam Diversion in Heterogeneous Reservoirs: Effect of Permeability and Injection Method,”SPE Journal22, 1402–1415 (2017); doi.org/10.2118/179650-PA
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alvarez, J. M., Rivas, H., and Rossen, W.R.
    , “A Unified Model for Steady-State Foam Behavior at High and Low Foam Qualities,”SPE Journal6 (2001), 325–333; doi.org/10.2118/74141-PA
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Apaydin, O.G. and Kovscek, A.R.
    “Surfactant Concentration and End Effects on Foam Flow in Porous Media,”Transport in Porous Media43, 511–536 (2001); doi.org/10.1023/A:1010740811277
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Ashoori, E., Marchesin, D., and Rossen, W.R.
    , “Multiple Foam States and Long-Distance Foam Propagation in Porous Media,”SPE Journal17, 1231–45 (2012); doi.org/10.2118/154024-PA
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Boeije, C. S., and Rossen, W. R.
    , “SAG foam flooding in carbonate rocks,”J. Petroleum Science and Engineering171, 843–853 11 (2018); doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.08.017
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Eftekhari, A. A. and Farajzadeh, R.
    , “Effect of Foam on Liquid Phase Mobility in Porous Media,”Scientific Reports (2017); doi.org/10.1038/srep43870
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Falls, A. H. Hirasaki, G. J., Patzek, T. W., Gauglitz, D. A., Miller, D. D., and Raulowski, T.
    , “Development of a Mechanistic Foam Simulator: The Population Balance and Generation by Snap-Off,”, SPERE3, 884-892 (1988); doi.org/10.2118/14961-PA
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Farajzadeh, R., Eftekhari, A. A., Kahrobaei, S., Hajibeygi, van der Meer, H. J., Vincent-Bonnieu, S., and Rossen, W. R.
    , “Simulation of Instabilities and Fingering in Surfactant Alternating Gas (SAG) Foam Enhanced Oil Recovery,”J. Natural Gas Sci. Eng.34, 1191–1204 (2016); doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.08.008
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Gauglitz, P.A., Friedmann, F., Kam, S. I, and Rossen, W.R.
    , “Foam Generation in Homogeneous Porous Media,”Chem. Eng. Sci.57, 4037–4052 (2002); doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00340-8
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Heller, J. P.
    . “CO2 Foams in Enhanced Oil Recovery,” in Foams: Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry, L.LSchramm, ed., Advances in Chemistry, American Chemical Society, 201–234 (1994); doi.org/10.1021/ba-1994-0242.ch005
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Kam, S. I., and Rossen, W. R.
    , “A Model for Foam Generation in Homogeneous Porous Media,”SPE Journal8417–425 (2003); doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00340-8
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Kapetas, L., Vincent-Bonnieu, S., Farajzadeh, R., Eftekhari, A.A., Mohd Shafian, S.R., Kamarul Bahrim, R.Z. and Rossen, W.R.
    “Effect of permeability on foam-model parameters: An integrated approach from core-flood experiments through to foam diversion calculations,”Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects530, 172–180 (2017); doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.06.060
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Khatib, Z. I., Hirasaki, G. J., & Falls, A. H.
    “Effects of Capillary Pressure on Coalescence and Phase Mobilities in Foams Flowing Through Porous Media,”SPE Reservoir Eng.3, 919–926 (1988); doi:10.2118/15442‑PA
     https://doi.org/10.2118/15442-PA [Google Scholar]
  14. Kibodeaux, K.R. and Rossen, W.R.
    “Coreflood Study of Surfactant-Alternating-Gas Foam Processes: Implications for Field Design”. SPE Western Regional Meeting, (SPE paper 38318), Long Beach, CA, USA, 25–27 (1997); doi.org/10.2118/38318‑MS
     https://doi.org/org/10.2118/38318-MS [Google Scholar]
  15. Lotfollahi, M., Kim, I., Beygi, M. R., Worthen, A. J., Huh, C., Johnston, K. P., Wheeler, M. F., and. DiCarlo, D. A.
    , “Foam Generation Hysteresis in Porous Media: Experiments and New Insights,”Transp Porous Med116, 687–703 (2017); doi.org/10.1007/s11242-016-0796-6
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Matthews, C. S.
    . “Carbon Dioxide Flooding,” in Developments in Petroleum Science, ed. E. C.Donaldson, G. V.Chilingarian and T. F.Yen, Elsevier, 129–156 (1989); doi.org/10.1016/S0376‑7361(08)70458‑8
     https://doi.org/org/10.1016/S0376-7361(08)70458-8 [Google Scholar]
  17. Rossen, W. R., and Bruining, J.
    , “Foam Displacements With Multiple Steady States,”SPE Journal12, 5–18 (2007); doi.org/10.2118/89397‑PA
     https://doi.org/org/10.2118/89397-PA [Google Scholar]
  18. Rossen, W.R. and Gauglitz, P.A.
    , “Percolation Theory of Creation and Mobilization of Foams in Porous Media,”AIChE J.36, 1176–1188 (1990); doi.org/10.1002/aic.690360807
     https://doi.org/org/10.1002/aic.690360807 [Google Scholar]
  19. Rossen, W.R. and Zhou, Z.H.
    , “Modeling Foam Mobility at the Limiting Capillary Pressure,”SPE Adv. Technol.3, 146–152 (1995); doi.org/10.2118/22627‑PA
     https://doi.org/org/10.2118/22627-PA [Google Scholar]
  20. Schramm, L. L.
    “Foams: Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry”. Number 242 in Advances in Chemistry Series. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA (1994); doi.org/10.1021/ba‑1994‑0242.fw001
     https://doi.org/org/10.1021/ba-1994-0242.fw001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Shah, S. Y., Wolf, K.-H.; Pilus, R., and Rossen, W. R.
    , “Foam generation by capillary snap-off in flow across a sharp permeability transition,”paper SPE 190210 presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference held in Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 14–18 April2018; accepted for publication in SPE Journal; doi.org/10.2118/190210‑PA
     https://doi.org/org/10.2118/190210-PA [Google Scholar]
  22. Shah, S.Y, AsSyukri, Wolf, K.-H., Pilus, R., and Rossen, W.R.
    , “Foam generation by snap-off in flow across a sharp permeability transition,”presented at the EAGE IOR Symposium, Pau, France, April 8–10, 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Shan, D. and Rossen, W.R.
    , “Optimal Injection Strategies for Foam IOR,”SPE Journal9, 132–150 (2004); doi.org/10.2118/88811‑PA
     https://doi.org/org/10.2118/88811-PA [Google Scholar]
  24. Simjoo, M., Dong, Y., Andrianov, A., Talanana, M. and Zitha, P. L. J.
    “CT Scan Study of Immiscible Foam Flow in Porous Media for Enhancing Oil Recovery,”Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research52 (18), 6221-6233 (2013); doi.org/10.1021/ie300603v
     https://doi.org/org/10.1021/ie300603v [Google Scholar]
  25. Tanzil, D., Hirasaki, G. J., & Miller, C. A.
    , “Conditions for Foam Generation in Homogeneous Porous Media,”Presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 13–17 April (2002); doi.org/10.2118/75176‑MS
     https://doi.org/org/10.2118/75176-MS [Google Scholar]
  26. Van der Meer, J., Farajzadeh, R., Rossen, B. & Jansen, J. D.
    , “Influence of foam on the stability characteristics of immiscible flow in porous media,”Physics of Fluids30, 1 (2018); doi.org/10.1063/1.5000891
     https://doi.org/org/10.1063/1.5000891 [Google Scholar]
  27. Wassmuth, F. R., Green, K. A., Randall, L.
    , “Details of In-Situ Foam Propagation Exposed With Magnetic Resonance Imaging”. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering4, 135–145 (2001); doi.org/10.2118/71300‑PA
     https://doi.org/org/10.2118/71300-PA [Google Scholar]
  28. Xu, Q. and Rossen, W. R.
    “Experimental Study of Gas Injection in Surfactant-Alternating-Gas Foam Process,”SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 7, 438–448 (2004); doi.org/10.2118/84183-MS
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Yu, G., Rossen, W. R., and Vincent-Bonnieu, S.
    , “Coreflood Study of Effect of Surfactant Concentration on Foam Generation in Porous Media,”Journal of Industrial & Engineering Chemistry (2019a); doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b03141
     https://doi.org/org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b03141 [Google Scholar]
  30. Yu, G., Vincent-Bonnieu, S., and Rossen, W. R.
    , “Foam Propagation at Low Superficial Velocity: Implications for Long-Distance Foam Propagation,”presented at the EAGE IOR Symposium, Pau, France, April 8–10, 2019b.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhou, Z.H. and Rossen, W.R.
    , “Applying Fractional-Flow Theory to Foams for Diversion in Matrix Acidization,”SPE Prod. Fac.9, 29–35 (1994); doi.org/10.2118/24660‑PA
     https://doi.org/org/10.2118/24660-PA [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900109
Loading
Coreflood Study of Non-Monotonic Fractional-Flow Behavior with Foam: Implications for Surfactant-Alternating-Gas Foam EOR
Conference Proceedings 2019, 1 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201900109
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900109
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900109
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error