1887

Abstract

Summary

This work is concerned with the nature of produced fluids resulting from ASP injection in a carbonate reservoir in Kuwait. The main objective is to examine and identify the nature of produced emulsions at conditions and chemical concentrations that are predicted by numerical simulation studies of the ASP pilot. The laboratory element of the work provides emulsion handling insight before the pilot begins, to reduce potential downtime and production costs.

Laboratory tests and numerical simulations were used to identify the nature of the produced fluids. The simulations used a pilot-scale model to determine realistic ranges of chemical concentrations. The laboratory study used these pre-determined concentration ranges to form, observe, and characterize the emulsions. Key variables that increase emulsion formation and stability are determined. Variables studied include total surfactant concentration, surfactant ratio, polymer, effects of crushed core, temperature, pH, salinity, and viscosity.

O/W and W/O emulsions were formed with a typical emulsion stability pattern of sedimentation followed by coalescence. The emulsion stability varied with conditions. The conditions leading to the most-stable and problematic emulsions included high surfactant, high polymer concentrations, low temperatures, and high salinity. Dense, creamy emulsions were the most stable. When surfactant concentration was increased, interfacial tension decreased, stability increased, and water and oil qualities decreased. A low interfacial tension allowed smaller (more stable) droplets to form, slowed sedimentation, and if low enough stabilized drops against coalescence. As polymer concentration increased, the aqueous viscosity increased and slowed sedimentation, water quality increased, and oil quality decreased. Shearing the polymer (reducing the viscosity) increased sedimentation. Emulsion stability decreased markedly when the temperature was increased. Sedimentation and coalescence were faster, giving an improved oil quality. Lower oil/water viscosities and densities, plus higher thermal energy destabilize the emulsions.

Pilot recommendations: At low surfactant concentration, adequate residence time in the separator is needed, where the phases exiting will be easier to break. For higher surfactant concentrations, in-field bottle-testing of stable, dense emulsions is needed to select a chemical demulsifier and neutralize the surfactant. The success of chemical EOR pilots can be jeopardized due to the formation and stability of produced emulsions. Increased downtime and unplanned mitigation costs may ruin a pilot. Limited ASP emulsion handling resources are available in industry due to the limited ASP pilots made public worldwide. This work provides additional produced emulsion resources and investigations before the pilot begins and also addresses new challenges in a carbonate reservoir ASP flood.

Abstract

This work is concerned with the nature of produced fluids resulting from ASP injection in a carbonate reservoir in Kuwait. The main objective is to examine and identify the nature of produced emulsions at conditions and chemical concentrations that are predicted by numerical simulation studies of the ASP pilot. The laboratory element of the work provides emulsion handling insight before the pilot begins, to reduce potential downtime and production costs.

Laboratory tests and numerical simulations were used to identify the nature of the produced fluids. The simulations used a pilot-scale model to determine realistic ranges of chemical concentrations. The laboratory study used these pre-determined concentration ranges to form, observe, and characterize the emulsions. Key variables that increase emulsion formation and stability are determined. Variables studied include total surfactant concentration, surfactant ratio, polymer, effects of crushed core, temperature, pH, salinity, and viscosity.

O/W and W/O emulsions were formed with a typical emulsion stability pattern of sedimentation followed by coalescence. The emulsion stability varied with conditions. The conditions leading to the most-stable and problematic emulsions included high surfactant, high polymer concentrations, low temperatures, and high salinity. Dense, creamy emulsions were the most stable. When surfactant concentration was increased, interfacial tension decreased, stability increased, and water and oil qualities decreased. A low interfacial tension allowed smaller (more stable) droplets to form, slowed sedimentation, and if low enough stabilized drops against coalescence. As polymer concentration increased, the aqueous viscosity increased and slowed sedimentation, water quality increased, and oil quality decreased. Shearing the polymer (reducing the viscosity) increased sedimentation. Emulsion stability decreased markedly when the temperature was increased. Sedimentation and coalescence were faster, giving an improved oil quality. Lower oil/water viscosities and densities, plus higher thermal energy destabilize the emulsions.

Pilot recommendations: At low surfactant concentration, adequate residence time in the separator is needed, where the phases exiting will be easier to break. For higher surfactant concentrations, in-field bottle-testing of stable, dense emulsions is needed to select a chemical demulsifier and neutralize the surfactant. The success of chemical EOR pilots can be jeopardized due to the formation and stability of produced emulsions. Increased downtime and unplanned mitigation costs may ruin a pilot. Limited ASP emulsion handling resources are available in industry due to the limited ASP pilots made public worldwide. This work provides additional produced emulsion resources and investigations before the pilot begins and also addresses new challenges in a carbonate reservoir ASP flood.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900113
2019-04-08
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdullah, M., Tiwari, S., & Pathak, A.
    (2015, March8). Evolution of Chemical EOR (ASP) Program for a Carbonate Reservoir in North Kuwait. SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, 8–11 March, Manama, Bahrain.SPE-172608-MS. doi:10.2118/172608‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/172608-MS [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Murayri, M. T., Al-Qenae, A., AlRukaibi, D., Chatterjee, M., & Hewitt, P.
    (2017, October15). Design of a Partitioning Interwell Tracer Test for a Chemical EOR Pilot Targeting the Sabriyah Mauddud Carbonate Reservoir in Kuwait. SPE Kuwait Oil and Gas Show and Conference, 15–18 October, Kuwait City, Kuwait. SPE-187549-MS. doi:10.2118/187549‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/187549-MS [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Murayri, M. T., Al-Kharji, A. A., Kamal, D. S., Al-Ajmi, M. F., Al-Ajmi, R. N., Al-Shammari, M. J., Al-Asfoor, T.H., Badham, S.J., Bouma, C., Brown, J., Suniga, P.
    (2018, March26). Successful Implementation of a One-Spot Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer ASP Pilot in a Giant Carbonate Reservoir. SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, 26–28 March, Muscat, Oman. SPE-190374-MS. doi:10.2118/190374‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/190374-MS [Google Scholar]
  4. Curren, M., Kaiser, A., Adkins, S., Qubian, A., Al-Enezi, H., Sana, H., … Delshad, M.
    (2018, September24). Effects of CEOR Chemicals on Asphaltene Precipitation. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 24–26 September, Dallas. SPE-191747-MS. doi:10.2118/191747‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/191747-MS [Google Scholar]
  5. Di, W., Meng, X., Zhao, F., Zhang, R., Yan, C., Wang, Q., & Liang, H.
    (2001, January1). Emulsification and Stabilization of ASP Flooding Produced Liquid. SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, 13–16 February, Houston, Texas. SPE-65390-MS. doi:10.2118/65390‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/65390-MS [Google Scholar]
  6. Fortenberry, R., Delshad, M., Suniga, P., Koyassan Veedu, F., Wang, P., Al-Kaaoud, H., Singh, B.B., Tiwari, S., Baroon, B., Pope, G. A.
    (2016, April11). Interwell ASP Pilot Design for Kuwait's Sabriyah-Mauddud. SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, 11–13 April, Tulsa, Oklahoma. SPE-179703-MS. doi:10.2118/179703‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/179703-MS [Google Scholar]
  7. Kokal, S. L., Al-Ghamdi, A., & Meeranpillai, N. S.
    (2007, March1). An Investigative Study of Potential Emulsion Problems Before Field Development. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 24–27 September, San Antonio, Texas. SPE-102856-MS. doi:10.2118/102856‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/102856-PA [Google Scholar]
  8. Koyassan Veedu, F., Nebrigic, D., Smallwood, A., Hickey, J., Wang, P., Pope, G. A., Delshad, M., Al-Maraghi, E., Singh, B.B., Al-Matar, B.S., Al-Saad, B.A., Al-Qahtani, M.M., Tiwari, S.
    (2015, October11). EOR Pilot Design Through an Integrated Laboratory Evaluation and Reservoir Modeling Study for a Large Carbonate Field in Kuwait. SPE Kuwait Oil and Gas Show and Conference, 11–14 October, Mishref, Kuwait. SPE-175348-MS. doi:10.2118/175348‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/175348-MS [Google Scholar]
  9. Levitt, D., Jackson, A., Heinson, C., Britton, L. N., Malik, T., Dwarakanath, V., & Pope, G. A.
    (2009, April1). Identification and Evaluation of High-Performance EOR Surfactants. SPE Rservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 12, 2, 243–253. doi:10.2118/100089‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/100089-PA [Google Scholar]
  10. Nguyen, D. T., & Sadeghi, N.
    (2012, January1). Stable Emulsion and Demulsification in Chemical EOR Flooding: Challenges and Best Practices. SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, 16–18 April, Muscat Oman. SPE-154044-MS. doi:10.2118/154044‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/154044-MS [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900113
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900113
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error