1887

Abstract

Summary

Chemical EOR is now considered as an attractive option for low permeability reservoirs, in particular where lack of gas supply does not allow gas injection processes. However, its application can be challenging for permeabilities below 100 mD as poor injectivity and high chemical retention are frequently observed. This work aimed at investigating the impact of both chemical and mineralogical parameters on the transport of polymer solutions in well-controlled low permeability porous media.

Selected polyacrylamide (HPAM) solubilized in brines of variable strengths and hardnesses were injected in granular sand and clays packs having similar petrophysical characteristics (permeability around 60–80 mD) but variable and well controlled mineralogical compositions. The granular packs were characterized in terms of structure (SEM) and specific surface area (BET) before and after polymer injections. The main observables of the coreflood tests were the resistance and residual resistance factors generated by the polymer, the polymer inaccessible pore volume and its irreversible retention.

Viscometric analysis showed that the HPAM solutions intrinsic viscosity decreased with increasing total salinity, as expected from charge screening, with a sharp decrease in presence of divalent cations, even at low ionic strength, which was less expected. Coreflood experiments revealed that polymer retention, resistance factor and irreversible resistance factor increased significantly: (a) with increasing ionic strength and hardness for porous media of a given mineralogical composition (this appeared consistent with the outcomes of the viscometric study and confirmed the major impact of hardness); (b) in presence of clays, even at low ionic strength and hardness. The polymer inaccessible pore volume was significantly impacted by the presence of clays, but not by the brine composition.

Assuming that polymer retention originated in polymer adsorption, irreversible resistance factors were translated into adsorbed layer thicknesses according to a simple capillary bundle model. This allowed discussing the results in terms of adsorbed layer density, which was showed to increase if brine hardness was increased and to be lower in presence of illite than kaolinite and pure quartz. These findings indicate that complex polymer adsorption/retention mechanisms occur depending on the clay type (layer charge and expandability).

This systematic study allowed dissociating the impacts of salinity, hardness and clay contents/types on the transport properties of polymer solutions in low permeability porous media. Its results should be of interest to the chemical EOR industry as they provide guides to help tuning the injection brine composition and polymer concentration to the reservoir properties.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900119
2019-04-08
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bagassi, M.; Chauveteau, G.; Lecourtier, J.; Englert, J.; Tirrell, M.
    (1989): Behavior of adsorbed polymer layers in shear and elongational flows. In Macromolecules22 (1), pp. 262–266. DOI: 10.1021/ma00191a049.
    https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00191a049 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brunauer, Stephen; Emmett, P. H.; Teller, Edward
    (1938): Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers. In J. Am. Chem. Soc.60 (2), pp. 309–319. DOI: 10.1021/ja01269a023.
    https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01269a023 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chauveteau, Guy
    (1981): Molecular Interpretation of Several Different Properties of Flow of Coiled Polymer Solutions Through Porous Media in Oil Recovery Conditions. In : SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. San Antonio, Texas, 1981-10-04: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dawson, Rapier; Lantz, Ronald B.
    (1972): Inaccessible Pore Volume in Polymer Flooding. In Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal12 (05), pp. 448–452. DOI: 10.2118/3522‑PA.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/3522-PA [Google Scholar]
  5. Delamaide, Eric; Tabary, Rene; Rousseau, David
    (2014): Chemical EOR in Low Permeability Reservoirs. In : SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia. SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia. Muscat, Oman, 2014-03-31: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hirasaki, G. J.; Pope, G. A.
    (1974): Analysis of Factors Influencing Mobility and Adsorption in the Flow of Polymer Solution Through Porous Media. In Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal14 (04), pp. 337–346. DOI: 10.2118/4026‑PA.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/4026-PA [Google Scholar]
  7. Lecourtier, J.; Chauveteau, G.
    (1984): Propagation of Polymer Slugs Through Porous Media. In : SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Houston, Texas, 1984-09-16: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Marliere, C.; Wartenberg, N.; Fleury, M.; Tabary, R.; Dalmazzone, C.; Delamaide, E.
    (2015): Oil Recovery in Low Permeability Sandstone Reservoirs Using Surfactant-Polymer Flooding. In : SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference. SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference. Quito, Ecuador, 2015-11-18: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mikhail, R.Sh; Brunauer, Stephen; Bodor, E.E
    (1968): Investigations of a complete pore structure analysis. In Journal of Colloid and Interface Science26 (1), pp. 45–53. DOI: 10.1016/0021‑9797(68)90270‑1.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(68)90270-1 [Google Scholar]
  10. Pefferkorn
    (1999): Polyacrylamide at Solid/Liquid Interfaces. In Journal of Colloid and Interface Science216 (2), pp. 197–220. DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1999.6312.
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1999.6312 [Google Scholar]
  11. Rodriguez Manrique, Fernancelys; Rousseau, David; Bekri, Samir; Djabourov, Madeleine; Bejarano, Celia Agustina
    (2014): Polymer Flooding for Extra-Heavy Oil: New Insights on the Key Polymer Transport Properties in Porous Media. In : SPE International Heavy Oil Conference and Exhibition. SPE International Heavy Oil Conference and Exhibition. Mangaf, Kuwait, 2014-12-08: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Seright, Randall S.; Seheult, J. Mac; Talashek, Todd
    (2009): Injectivity Characteristics of EOR Polymers. In SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering12 (05), pp. 783–792. DOI: 10.2118/115142‑PA.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/115142-PA [Google Scholar]
  13. Sheng, James
    (2011): Modern chemical enhanced oil recovery. Theory and practice. Amsterdam, Boston: Gulf Professional Pub.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sorbie, K. S.
    (1992): Polymer-improved oil recovery. Blackie & Son, Glasgow, 1991. pp. xii+ 359,. ISBN 0–216–92693–9. In Polym. Int.28 (3), p. 256. DOI: 10.1002/pi.4990280317.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.4990280317 [Google Scholar]
  15. Yerramilli, Sanjay Surya; Zitha, P. L. J.; Yerramilli, Ramesh Chandra
    (2013): Novel Insight into Polymer Injectivity for Polymer Flooding. In : SPE European Formation Damage Conference & Exhibition. SPE European Formation Damage Conference & Exhibition. Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 2013-06-05: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang, Guoyin; Seright, Randall
    (2014): Effect of Concentration on HPAM Retention in Porous Media. In SPE Journal19 (03), pp. 373–380. DOI: 10.2118/166265‑PA.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/166265-PA [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang, Xiang; Cresswell, Mark
    (2015): Inorganic Controlled Release Technology. Materials and Concepts for Advanced Drug Formulation. Burlington: Elsevier Science. Available online at http://gbv.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=2197269.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900119
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900119
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error