1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. IOR 2019 – 20th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

This work presents the development of an improved formulation based on an Alpha Olefin Sulfonate (AOS) as the main surfactant for in-situ foam generation. The need for this formulation enhancement is driven by the the harsh reservoir conditions of the presented case study, which push the surfactants to the limit and pose new challenges for foam EOR application. According to literature, anionic surfactants mixed with zwitterionic surfactants (such as betaines), possess strong interaction and profound synergistic effects for improving foam generation ability and foam stability. In this sense, betaines act as foam boosters and are able to expand the range of application of the main surfactants. Unfortunately, laboratory optimization procedures are not widely documented in the literature.

Therefore, the aim of this paper is to delimit the applicability range of the AOS surfactant and to investigate its synergistic effects in mixtures with betaines to enhance foam performance. These are important steps to successfully design a robust formulation for a field pilot. For this purpose, we followed a laboratory workflow with a de-risking approach to define the most appropriate formulation for the challenging reservoir conditions of the presented case (high salinity, high divalent concentration, light oil, hydrocarbon gas and high temperature). The experiment setup was the following:

Phase 1 defines the most appropriate base surfactant (AOS) among a series of commercial candidates. The negative impact of each variable (salinity, temperature and presence of light hydrocarbons) and differences between different AOS providers are addressed.

Phase 2 defines the most appropriate betaine booster to be combined with the previously selected AOS and narrows the surfactant- booster ratio for enhanced synergistic effects in static conditions.

Phase 3 optimizes the surfactant-booster ratio in a dynamic co-injection of the formulation, nitrogen gas and slugs of oil through a porous medium with similar characteristics to the reservoir rock.

Phase 4 characterizes foam behavior according to critical variables (interstitial velocity, salinity, gas-water ratio) in coreflooding experiments using a core sample with live oil residual saturation. History matching allows to retrieve input parameters for the dynamic simulation.

As a result of this study, a mixture of an AOS C14-C16 and cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine (CAPHS) gave the best performance. The designed formulation has proved its robustness in a wide range of conditions, which will allow to generate strong foam at reservoir conditions and provide stable foam propagation, overcoming variations in salinity, concentration and gas-water ratio along the reservoir.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900150
2019-04-08
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900150
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aarra, M. G., & Skauge, A.
    (1994). A Foam Pilot in a North Sea Oil Reservoir: Preparation for a Production Well Treatment. SPE 69th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, (1), 373–385.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alkan, H., Goktekin, A., & Satman, A.
    (1991). A Laboratory Study of CO2-Foam Process for Bati Raman Field, Turkey. In Middle East Oil Show. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bascialla, G., Montes, J., Romero, P., Rodriguez, R., & Del Moral, J.
    (2017). Feasibility of Foam Application in a Giant Mature Field Under Miscible WAG Injection. SPE Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Basheva, E. S., Ganchev, D., Denkov, N. D., Kasuga, K., Satoh, N., & Tsujii, K.
    (2000). Role of Betaine as Foam Booster in the Presence of Silicone Oil Drops. Langmuir, 16(3), 1000–1013.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cubillos, H., Montes, J., Prieto, C., & Romero, P.
    (2013). Assessment of Foam for GOR Control to Optimize Miscible Gas Injection Recovery. SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, 1–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Li, R. F., Hirasaki, G., Miller, C. A., & Masalmeh, S. K.
    (2012). Wettability Alteration and Foam Mobility Control in a Layered, 2D Heterogeneous Sandpack. SPE Journal, 17(04), 1207–1220.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu, Y., Grigg, R. B., & Svec, R. K.
    (2005). CO2 Foam Behavior: Influence of Temperature, Pressure, and Concentration of Surfactant. In SPE Production Operations Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Mannhardt, K., Schramm, L. L., & Novosad, J. J.
    (1991). Effect of rock type and brine composition on adsorption of two foam-forming sufactants. Spe 20463, 1(1), 212–218.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Mumtaz, M., Tan, I. M., & Mushtaq, M.
    (2015). Synergistic Effects of Surfactants Mixture for Foam Stability Measurements for Enhanced Oil Recovery Applications. In SPE Saudi Arabia Section Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Osei-Bonsu, K., Grassia, P., & Shokri, N.
    (2017). Relationship between bulk foam stability, surfactant formulation and oil displacement efficiency in porous media. Fuel, 203, 403–410.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Rosen, M. J., & Kunjappu, J. T.
    (2012). Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena: Fourth Edition. Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena: Fourth Edition. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Shell, R. F., Shell, a A., Solutions, G., Nmi, R. K., & Delft, W. R. R.
    (2012). Foam-Oil Interaction in Porous Media - Implications for Foam-assisted Enhanced Oil Recovery ( SPE 154197 ). 74th EAGE Conference & Exhibition Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2012 Copenhagen, Denmark, 4–7 June 2012, (June 2012), 4–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Tang, J., Vincent Bonnieu, S., & Rossen, W. R.
    (2017). The Effect of Oil on Steady-state Foam Flow Regimes in Porous Media.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Van Os, N. M., van Ginkel, R., van Zon, A., Heywood, F. W., Berryman, E. L., & Borchardt, J. K.
    (1996). Anionic surfactants: Organic chemistry. In H.Stake (Ed.), Surfactant Science Series (Vol. 56). Marcel Dekker.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, D., Liu, C., Wu, W., & Wang, G.
    (2008). Development of an Ultralow Interfacial Tension Surfactant in Systems With No-Alkali for Chemical Flooding. In SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery. Tulsa, Oklahoma: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, Y., Ge, J., Zhang, G., Jiang, P., Zhang, W., & Lin, Y.
    (2015). Adsorption behavior of dodecyl hydroxypropyl sulfobetaine on limestone in high salinity water. RSC Advances, 5(73), 59738–59744.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Xia, H.
    (2006). Mechanism of betaine surfactant solution on residual oil after waterflooding in ultralow interfacial tension. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 30(24).
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhdanov, S. A., Amiyan, A. V., Surguchev, L. M., Castanier, L. M., & Hanssen, J. E.
    (1996). Application of Foam for Gas and Water Shut-off: Review of Field Experience. In European Petroleum Conference (Vol. 86, pp. 2360–2366). Society of Petroleum Engineers.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Zoller, U.
    (Ed.). (2008). Handbook of Detergents, Part E. Handbook of Detergents, Part E: Applications (Vol. 20084959). CRC Press.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900150
Loading
Enhancement of a Foaming Formulation with Zwitterionic Surfactants for GOR Control Application in Harsh Reservoir Conditions
Conference Proceedings 2019, 1 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201900150
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900150
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900150
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error