1887

Abstract

Summary

Standard gas Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Pressure-Volume-Temperature (PVT) program includes experiments such as solubility/swelling, multi-contact, slim tube, vapor-liquid equilibria (VLE) tests, and fluid property measurements. These tests are designed to determine the extent of gas miscibility and mixture phase behavior during gas injection in hydrocarbon reservoirs. These experimental programs are known to be expensive and time consuming. The degree of complexity increases as the industry move into conducting gas EOR PVT for high/ultra-high-pressure reservoirs. The focus of this paper is to demonstrate the challenges associated with these measurements and evaluate the merit, applicability, and usage of such data for fluid model development for high pressure gas EOR studies.

Associated challenges include utilizing gas concentrations up to 90% mole during swelling tests to determine critical mixture composition. Determination of dew point pressures by visual inspection or liquid build-up method proved inefficient. An interpretation of pressure-volume data showed good promise for determining both saturation pressure and liquid build-up curve for opaque dew point systems. VLE tests were designed at gas concentrations close to critical mixture composition to generate phases with increased affinity for mass transfer. Measured Minimum Miscibility Pressure (MMP) for all studied oil and gas systems were less than 6000 psia, except for N2 gas. Such relatively low MMP values suggest that development of full miscibility is not a concern for these high-pressure fluid systems. Such relatively low MMP values suggest that generated miscibility is not a concern for these high-pressure fluid systems. Instead the focus shifted to determine and effectively model the first contact miscibility pressures for these fluid systems (if it existed at pressures less than initial reservoir pressure). Measured MMPs were assigned a low weight factor in EoS model optimization process. Swelling test data for gas concentrations lower than 50% mole was of little value for EoS model optimization. Presence of precipitated asphaltenes challenged accurate measurement of liquid phase density and viscosity, as capture and analysis of a representative sample was very difficult. A knowledge of asphaltenes phase envelope for mixtures of reservoir fluid and injection gas proved to be invaluable.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900154
2019-04-08
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Otaibi, F.M., Al-Mutairi, S.M., Kokal, S.L., Funk, J.J., and Al-Qahtani, J.F.
    , 2012, Best Practices for Conducting CO2-EOR Lab Study, SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, Muscat, Oman, April 16–18, SPE# 151126.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alston, R.B., Kokolis, G.P., and James, C.F.
    , 1985, CO2 Minimum Miscibility Pressure: A Correlation for Impure CO2 Streams and Live Oil Systems, SPEJ, April 1985, 268–274.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anton-Paar DMA HPM Technical Specification Sheet, https://www.anton-paar.com/us-en/products/details/external-measuring-cell-dmatm-hpm/
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baled, H., Enicka, R.M., Wu, Y., McHugh, M.A., Burgessa, W., Tapriyal, D., Morreale, B.D.
    , 2012, Prediction of hydrocarbon densities at extreme conditions using volume-translated SRK and PR equations of state fit to high temperature, high pressure PVT data, Fluid Phase Equilibria317 (2012) 65–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Broad, J., Ab Majid, M.N., Ariffin, T., Hussain, A., Basher, A.B.
    , 2007, Deposition of “Asphaltenes” during CO2 Injection and Implication for EOS Description and Reservoir Performance, SPE International Petroleum Technology Conference, Dubai, U.A.E., December 4–7, IPTC# 11563.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cronquist, C.
    , 1978, Carbon Dioxide Dynamic Displacement with Light Reservoir Oils,” paper presented at the 1978 U.S. Doe Annual Symposium, Tulsa, Aug. 28–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Eakin, B.E., and Mitch, F.J.
    , 1988, Measurement and Correlation of Miscibility Pressures of Reservoir Oils, 63rd Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Houston, TX, October 2–5, 1988, SPE# 18065
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Firoozabadi, A. and Aziz, K.
    , Analysis and Correlation of Nitrogen and Lean-Gas Miscibility Pressure, SPERE (Nov. 1986) 575–582.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Glaso, O.
    , Generalized Minimum Miscibility Pressure Correlation, SPEJ (Dec. 1985) 927–934.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , Miscible Displacement: Recovery Tests with Nitrogen,” SPERE (Feb. 1990) 61–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Holm, L. W., and Josendal, V. A.
    , 1982, Effect of Oil Composition on Miscible-Type Displacement by Carbon Dioxide, SPEJ. (February 1982), 87–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hosein, R., Mayrhoo, R., McCain Jr., W.D.
    , 2014, Determination of Bubble-Point and Dew-Point Pressure Without a Visual Cell, SPE Biennial Energy Resources Conference, Port of Spain, Trinidad,June 9–11, SPE# 169947.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jefri DBR PVT Cell Technical Specification Sheet, http://www.slb.com/media/Files/core_pvt_lab/product_sheets/fluid_lab_equipment_phase_behavior_cell_ps.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jessen, K., Michelsen, M.L., and Stenby, E.H.
    , 1998, Effective Algorithm for Calculation of Minimum Miscibility Pressure, SPE European Petroleum Conference, The Hegue, The Netherlands, 20–22 October 1998, SPE#50632
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Oghena, A., Zhou, D., Fitzmorris, R., Chawathe, A., De La Colina, J., Orribo, J., Gentry, M.
    , 2017, Gas Injection for GOM Deepwater Wilcox Trend Fields Development: Challenges and Recovery Potential, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 9–11 October, San Antonio, Texas, SPE# 187243.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Peng, D.-Y., and Robinson, D. B.
    , 1976, A New Two-Constant Equation of State., Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 1976, 15 (1), 59.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Shaikh, J.A., and Sah, P.
    , 2011, Experimental PVT Data Needed to Develop EOS Model for EOR Projects, SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, July 19–21, SPE# 144023.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. RassenfossS.
    , 2014, Oil Tests at Extreme Conditions Yield New Data for Reservoir Modeling, Journal of Petroleum Technology, November 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. VISCOlab PVT Viscometer Technical Specification Sheet, http://www.cambridgeviscosity.com/high-pressure-viscometer
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Williams, J.M.
    , 2011, Why Y?, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA, 30 October–2 November 2011, SPE# 146394.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Whitson, C.H., and Brule, M.R.
    , 2000, Phase Behavior, SPE Monographs Volume 20, 121–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Yuan, H., Johns, R.T., Egwuenu, A.M., Dindoruk, B.
    , 2005, Improved MMP Correlations for CO2 Floods using Analytical Gasflooding Theory, SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, October 2005, 418–425.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900154
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900154
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error