1887

Abstract

Summary

Biosurfactants attract attentions in recent years due to their low-cost and environmental friendly nature. The potential of biosurfactants in improve oil recovery has been addressed previously, yet there are concerns about their performance at high salinity/high temperature conditions. This paper introduces a new biosurfactant named SUTBS which is extracted from the leaves of one of Iranian plants growing in the southern part of the country. It aims to study the EOR potential of SUTBS via IFT reduction and wettability alteration in sandstone core samples containing asphaltenic crude oil. Results showed that SUTBS solution at critical micelle concentration (CMC) and ten-time dilution of sea water (0.1SW) decreased IFT of oil/water from 36 to 5.5 mN/m. Such IFT reduction is comparable with the SDS solution leading to an IFT of 2.16 mN/m at the similar conditions. Dynamic contact angle were also conducted on a series of oil-wet sandstone thin sections at 80˚C at different salinity. Results showed that SUTBS solution has a good potential to alter rock wettability from oil wet to more water wetness such that at salinity of 0.1SW, SUTBS solution caused a significant reduction in contact angle from 155 (initial value) to 60 degrees. Moreover, SUTBS exhibited a good thermal stability as compared to SDS after 480 hours aging at 80ºC: the surface tension of SUTBS increased only from 50 to 58 mN/m, while SDS provided a high surface tension of 70 mN/m indicating a significant thermal degradation. Also, to quantify the oil recovery performance of SUTBS solution, a series of spontaneous imbibition tests were conducted using oil-wet sandstone core plugs at 80˚C. The ultimate oil recovery of the SUTBS solution was 14.02% of the OOIP as compared to 8.5% and 8% for 0.1SW and SDS solutions, respectively. It was found that the incremental oil recovery caused by SUTBS was mainly due to wettability alteration to more water wetness coupled by a modest IFT reduction. This was in line with the SEM analysis indicating a rather homogenous adsorption of SUTBS on the grain surface. Results of this study support the potential of the SUTBS biosurfactant as a low-cost chemical agent for IOR/EOR applications.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900164
2019-04-08
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AlAdasani, Ahmad, Baojun Bai, AhmadAl, and BaojunBai
    . 2011. “Analysis of EOR Projects and Updated Screening Criteria.” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering79(1–2): 10–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2011.07.005.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aghaeifar, Zahra et al.
    2018. “Low Salinity EOR Effects After Seawater Flooding in a High Temperature and High Salinity Offshore Sandstone Reservoir.” In SPE Norway One Day Seminar, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alotaibi, Mohammed B, Ramez ANasralla, and Hisham ANasr-El-Din
    . 2011. “Wettability Studies Using Low-Salinity Water in Sandstone Reservoirs.” SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering14(6): 713–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Banat, IBRAHIM M.
    1995. “Biosurfactants Production and Possible Uses in Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery and Oil Pollution Remediation: A Review.” Bioresource technology51(1): 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bordoloi, N K, and B KKonwar
    . 2008. “Microbial Surfactant-Enhanced Mineral Oil Recovery under Laboratory Conditions.” Colloids and surfaces B: Biointerfaces63(1): 73–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Heydari, Nasim, MahdiAsgari, Narjes ShojaiKaveh, and ZahraFakhroueian
    . 2018. “Novel Application of PEG/SDS Interaction as a Wettability Modifier of Hydrophobic Carbonate Surfaces.” Petroleum Science: 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Holmberg, Krister
    . 2001. “Natural Surfactants.” Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science6(2): 148–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Jarrahian, Kh et al
    . 2012. “Wettability Alteration of Carbonate Rocks by Surfactants: A Mechanistic Study.” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects410: 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Karnanda, Wimpy, M SBenzagouta, AbdulrahmanAlQuraishi, and M MAmro
    . 2013. “Effect of Temperature, Pressure, Salinity, and Surfactant Concentration on IFT for Surfactant Flooding Optimization.” Arabian Journal of Geosciences6(9): 3535–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kumar, Sunil, and AjayMandal
    . 2016. “Studies on Interfacial Behavior and Wettability Change Phenomena by Ionic and Nonionic Surfactants in Presence of Alkalis and Salt for Enhanced Oil Recovery.” Applied Surface Science372: 42–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kuyukina, Maria S et al.
    2005. “Effect of Biosurfactants on Crude Oil Desorption and Mobilization in a Soil System.” Environment international31(2): 155–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lake, Larry W
    , Russell T Johns, William R Rossen, and Gary A Pope. 2014. Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil Recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers Richardson, TX.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Nasralla, Ramez A, Mohammed ABataweel, and Hisham ANasr-El-Din
    . 2013. “Investigation of Wettability Alteration and Oil-Recovery Improvement by Low-Salinity Water in Sandstone Rock.” Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology52(2): 144–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Pereira, Jorge F B et al.
    2013. “Optimization and Characterization of Biosurfactant Production by Bacillus Subtilis Isolates towards Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery Applications.” Fuel111: 259–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rashid, Saeed et al
    . 2015. “Wettability Alteration in Carbonates during ‘Smart Waterflood’: Underlying Mechanisms and the Effect of Individual Ions.” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects487: 142–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Seo, Seokju et al.
    2018. “Performance Evaluation of Environmentally Benign Nonionic Biosurfactant for Enhanced Oil Recovery.” Fuel234: 48–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Sheng, James
    . 2010. Modern Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery: Theory and Practice. Gulf Professional Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Shutang, Gao, and GaoQiang
    . 2010. “Recent Progress and Evaluation of ASP Flooding for EOR in Daqing Oil Field.” In SPE EOR Conference at Oil & Gas West Asia, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Strand, Skule, Dag CStandnes, and TorAustad
    . 2003. “Spontaneous Imbibition of Aqueous Surfactant Solutions into Neutral to Oil-Wet Carbonate Cores: Effects of Brine Salinity and Composition.” Energy & fuels17(5): 1133–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Touhami, Youssef, VladimirHornof, and Graham HNeale
    . 1998. “Dynamic Interfacial Tension Behavior of Acidified Oil/surfactant-Enhanced Alkaline Systems 1. Experimental Studies.” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects132(1): 61–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Udoh, Tinuola, LateefAkanji, and JanVinogradov
    . 2018. “Experimental Investigation of Potential of Combined Controlled Salinity and Bio-Surfactant CSBS in Enhanced Oil Recovery EOR Processes.” In SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Urum, Kingsley, and TurgayPekdemir
    . 2004. “Evaluation of Biosurfactants for Crude Oil Contaminated Soil Washing.” Chemosphere57(9): 1139–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Veshareh, Moein Jahanbani et al.
    2018. “Isolation and Screening of Bacillus Subtilis MJ01 for MEOR Application: Biosurfactant Characterization, Production Optimization and Wetting Effect on Carbonate Surfaces.” Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology: 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Yang, Peng et al.
    2019. “Comprehensive Review of Alkaline–Surfactant–Polymer (ASP)-Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR).” In Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2017, Springer, 858–72.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900164
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900164
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error