The magnetotelluric impedance tensor through Clifford algebras: part I — theory

References

1. BahrK.1988. Interpretation of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor: regional induction and local telluric distortion. Journal of Geophysics62, 119–127.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BahrK.1991. Geological noise in magnetotelluric data: a classification on distortion types. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors66, 24–38.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bayro‐CorrochanoE.2005. Robot perception and action using conformal geometry. In: Handbook of Geometric Computing, pp. 405–458. Springer, Berlin.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BibbyH.M., CaldwellT.G. and BrownC.2005, Determinable and non‐determinable parameters of galvanic distortion in magnetotellurics. Geophysical Journal International163, 915–930.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BookerJ.R.2014. The magnetotelluric phase tensor: a critical review. Surveys in Geophysics35, 7–40.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BibbyH.M.1986. Analysis of multiple‐source bipole‐dipole resistivity surveys using the apparent resistivity tensor. Geophysics51, 972–983.
   [Google Scholar]
7. BronshteinI.N., SemendyayevK.A., MusiolG. and MuehligH.2007. Handbook of Mathematics. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Harri Deutsch, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
   [Google Scholar]
8. CaldwellT. G., BibbyH. M. and BrownC.2004. The magnetotelluric phase tensor. Geophysical Journal International158, 457–469.
   [Google Scholar]
9. ChaveA. D. and SmithJ. T.1994. On electric and magnetic galvanic distortion tensor decompositions. Journal of Geophysical Research99, 4669–4682.
   [Google Scholar]
10. ChaveA.D.2014. On the statistics of magnetotelluric rotational invariants. Geophysical Journal International196, 111–130.
    [Google Scholar]
11. GroomR. W. and BaileyR. C.1989. Decomposition of magnetotelluric impedance tensors in the presence of local three‐dimensional galvanic distortion. Journal of Geophysical Research94, 1913–1925.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Groom, R.W. and Bailey, R.C.1991. Analytical investigations of the effects of near surface three dimensional galvanic scatters on MT tensor decomposition. Geophysics56, 496–518.
    [Google Scholar]
13. HestenesD. and SobczykG.1987. Clifford Algebra to Geometric Calculus: A Unified Language for Mathematics and Physics. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
14. G.Sommer
    HestenesD., LiH. and RockwoodA.2001. New algebraic tools for classical geometry. In: Geometric Computing with Clifford Algebras (ed. G.Sommer ), pp 3–26, Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
15. HildenbrandD., FontijneD., WangY., AlexaM. and DorstL.2006. Competitive runtime performance for inverse kinematics algorithms using conformal geometric algebra. Eurographics Conference Vienna (2006).
16. LilleyF.E.M.1998. Magnetotelluric tensor decomposition: Part I, Theory for a basic procedure. Geophysics63, 1885–1897.
    [Google Scholar]
17. H.‐S.Lim
    LilleyF.E.M. 2012. Magnetotelluric Tensor Decomposition: Insights from Linear Algebra and Mohr Diagrams. In: New Achievements in Geoscience (ed. H.‐S.Lim ), pp. 81–106. InTech.
    [Google Scholar]
18. LounestoP.2001. Clifford Algebras and Spinors. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 286. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. MackieR.L., SmithJ.T. and MaddenT.R.1994. Three-dimensional electromagnetic modeling using finite difference equation: the magnetotelluric example.Radio Science29, 923–935.
    [Google Scholar]
20. MartíA., QueraltP., JonesA. G. and LedoJ.2005. Improving Bahr's invariant parameter using the WAL approach. Geophysical Journal International163, 38–41.
    [Google Scholar]
21. McNeiceG. W. and JonesA. G.2001. Multisite, multifrequency tensor decomposition of magnetotelluric data. Geophysics66, 158–173.
    [Google Scholar]
22. MenonP.K., SweridukG.D., VaddiS.S. and OhlmeyerE.J.2004. Nonlinear discrete‐time design methods for missile flight control systems. Presented at the 2004 AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, August 16–19, Providence, RI.
23. Romero‐RuizI. and PousJ.2019. The magnetotelluric impedance tensor through Clifford algebras: Part II ‐ a constrained stochastic heuristic method for recovering the magnetotelluric regional impedance tensor in a 3D case. Geophysical Prospecting, in press.
24. SimpsonF. and BahrK.2005. Practical Magnetotellurics. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. SchottR. and StaplesG.S.2010. Reductions in computational complexity using Clifford algebras. Advances in Applied Clifford Algebra20, 121–140.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Smith, J.T.1995. Understanding telluric distortion matrices. Geophysical Journal International122, 219–226.
    [Google Scholar]
27. SzarkaL. and MenvielleM.1997. Analysis of rotational invariants of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor. Geophysical Journal International129, 133–142.
    [Google Scholar]
28. WeaverJ. T., AgarwalA.K. and LilleyF.E.M.2000. Characterization of the magnetotelluric tensor in terms of its invariants. Geophysical Journal International141, 321–336.
    [Google Scholar]
29. WeaverJ.T. and LilleyT.2004. The relationship between the magnetotelluric tensor invariants and the phase tensor of Caldwell, Bibby and Brown. Exploration Geophysics37, 261–267.
    [Google Scholar]
30. A.D.Chave
    WeideltP. and ChaveA.D.2012. The magnetotelluric response function. In: The Magnetotelluric Method: Theory and Practice (eds. A.D.Chave and A.G.Jones ), pp 122‐1‐64. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]