1887

Abstract

Summary

The quick development of broadband and high-density seismic acquisition methods is due to their recognition as strong and effective means for acquiring datasets that prove rich enough not only to dramatically improve the seismic imaging, but also the overall reservoir characterization. The application of high-productivity Vibroseis methods enables enforcing these methods at justifiable and acceptable costs, while not postponing the delivery of field data. As broadband and high productivity acquisitions are steadily spreading in Russia, the present abstract provides an overview of how the introduction of these methods affect seismic crews, with a focus on Vibroseis equipment and acquisition methods. Perspectives for further developments will be discussed as well.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900563
2019-03-25
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. 1Baeten, G., Willem de Maag, J., Plessix, R.E., Klaassen, R., Qureshi, T., Kleemeyer, M., Kroode, F. and Rujie, Z. (2013) The use of low frequencies in a full-waveform inversion and impedance inversion land seismic case study // Geophysical Prospecting, 61, 701–711.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2BouskaJ. (2010) Distance separated simultaneous sweeping, for fast, clean, vibroseis acquisition // Geophysical Prospecting, 2010, 58, 123–153
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 3FougeratA., GuérineauL. and TellierN. (2018) High-quality signal recording down to 0.001 Hz with standard MEMS accelerometers // SEG 88th Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstract
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 4MahrooqiS., RawahiS., YarubiS., YahyaiA., HuntK., ClowF. and VincentI. (2012) Cracking very LF land seismic acquisition – A step change // 74th EAGE Conference & Exhibition
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 5MichouL., MichelL., HerrmannP., ColéouT., FeugèresP and FomentoJ (2017) Survey design comparison regarding seismic reservoir characterization objectives // 79th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, extended abstract
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 6OurabahA., BradleyJ., HanceT., Kowalczyk-KedzierskaM., GrimshawM and MurrayM. (2015) Impact of acquisition geometry on AVO-AVOA attributes quality - A decimation study onshore Jordan // 77th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, extended abstract
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 7RetailleauM., El AsragR. and ShorterJ. (2014) Processing land broadband data: challenges that Oman surveys present and how they are addressed // EAGE/SPG Workshop on Broadband Seismic, expanded abstract
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 8TellierN., OllivrinG. and BoucardD. (2014) Optimizing the Generation and QC of Low-Dwell Sweeps // 76th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, extended abstract
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 9TellierN. and LainéJ. (2017) Understanding MEMS based digital seismic sensors // First Break35/1, 93–100
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 10YanchakD, MonkD. and VersfeltJ. (2018) Egypt West Kalabsha 3D Broadband Ultra High Density Seismic Survey // 88th SEG Annual Meeting, expanded abstract
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900563
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900563
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error