1887

Abstract

Summary

The idea of this study is to investigate the perspectives for application the Water Alternating Gas (WAG) and Simultaneous Water Alternating Gas (SWAG) techniques as potential EOR methods in the “Sm” oil reservoir – part of an “X” field in the southeastern part of the Pannonian Basin, Republic of Serbia. Reservoir is a massive one, with a light to medium oil in place. Reservoir rocks are different clastic sediments (sandstones, alevrolites) and the cap rocks are clays and marls. Workflow of this study included: (1) literature overview, (2) screening for application of the WAG and SWAG EOR techniques on Serbian fields, (3) gathering and analysis of the reservoir data, (4) modelling fluids’ PVT properties, (5) petrophysical modelling of the reservoir rock properties, (6) preparation and initialization of the 3D compositional hydrodynamic model (in tNavigator 18.2) for the simulation of displacement processes and assessment of field development parameters. Study showed that the studied reservoir is suitable for application of the SWAG and WAG EOR techniques. This conclusion was based on the improvement of oil recovery and additional cumulative oil production. for the best EOR case (CO2 and saturated gas CGI and WAG), oil recovery increased from 25,1% up to 46,2%.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900601
2019-03-25
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amin, M. E., Zekri, A. Y., Almehaideb, R. & Al-Attar, H.
    , 2013. Optimization of CO2 WAG Processes in a Selected Carbonate Reservoir: an Experimental Approach. International Journal of Engineering Research and Science & Technology, 2(2), pp. 19–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Christensen, J. P., Stenby, E. H. & Skauge, A.
    , 1998. Review of WAG Field Experience. Villahermosa, Mexico, Society of Petroleum Engineers, pp. 357–371.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Darvishneyhad, M. J.; Moradi, B.; Yargar, G; Adelyadeh, R. M.; Montayeri, G H.
    2010. Study of Various Injection Patterns in Water, Gas and WAG Injection Methods in an Iranian Fractured Reservoir. Teheran, 14th Intl. Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Congress.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. FatemiS.M., SohrabiM., JamiolahmadyM., IrelandS., RobertsonG
    2011. Experimenal Investigation of Near-Miscible WAG Injection Performance in Water-wet and Mixed-wet Systems. Aberdee, SPE Offshore Europe Oil and Gas Conference and Exebition.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Nangacovie, H. L. M.
    , 2012. Application of WAG and SWAG Injection Techniques in Norne E-Segment, Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Wu, X., Ogbe, D. O. & Khataniar, S.
    , 2004. Critical Design Factors and Evaluation of Recovery Performance of Miscible Displacement and WAG Process. Calgary, Alberta, Petroleum Society of Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Zahoor, M. K., Derahman, M. N. & Yunan, M. H.
    , 2011. WAG Process Design - an Updated Review. Brazilian Journal of Petroleum and Gas, 5(2), pp. 109–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Zolotukin, A. B. & Ursin, J.-R.
    , 2000. Fundamentals of Petroleum Reservoir Engineering. Kristiansand S: Høyskoleforlaget AS - Norwegian Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. DrozdovA.N., EgorovY.A., TelkovV.P., VerbickiyV.S., DengaevA.V. LambinD.N.
    2006. Technology and Technics od Water Alternating Gas EOR on Oil Reservoirs. Territoriya Neftegaz, 2(2), pp. 54–59 (in Russian)
    [Google Scholar]
  10. NazarovaL.N.
    , 2011. Development of Fields with Hard-to-Recover Oil Reserves. Moscow: Gubkin University Publication Center
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900601
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900601
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error