1887

Abstract

Summary

Improving the efficiency of exploration remains a priority issue for geologists and geophysicists. Detection and mapping of local small hydrocarbons deposits, likely associated with unconventional reservoirs, requires the use of non-traditional methods, one of which is multicomponent seismic survey. This allows obtaining all the necessary information: velocities of differently polarized elastic waves & their ratio, and, accordingly, Poisson’s coefficient. This fact improves the quality of seismic sections and gives them real geological (lithological) content, supplementing constructed models with information on reservoir properties and type of saturation. in this article we provide an overview of application results of using different variations of the multi-wave seismic in the context of solving various issues: identifying local oil-bearing zones, detailed mapping of the top part of the section and the permafrost, etc. According to the last researches, the introduction of this technology will optimize the exploration & exploitation of hard-to-recover reserves concentrated in non-traditional reservoirs, where multi-wave surveys still have great economic potential. Generally, based on a review of recent practical results provided by the multicomponent seismic, it can be concluded that the technology allows to expanding the range of issues, especially related to the refinement of difficult geological sections.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900603
2019-03-25
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Борисов, А.С.
    [2012] Многоволновая сейсморазведка (учебное пособие). К(П)ФУ.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Кузнецов, В.М., Жуков, А.П., НиконовЕ.О.
    [2014] Изучение многолетнемерзлых пород с использованием многоволновой сейсморазведки в применении к верхней части разреза. Технологии сейсморазведки, 1, 74–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Кузнецов, В.И.
    [2016]. Экспериментальные исследования возможностей многоволновой сейсморазведки (3C). Современные технологии нефтегазовой геофизики.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. НестеровИ.И.
    [2015] Перечень инновационных, в том числе, прорывных технологий, не имеющих аналогов за рубежом. НОЦ ТИУ.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Пузырев, Н.Н.
    [1997] Поперечные и обменные волны в сейсморазведке. Москва, издательство «Недра».
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Antipina, M., Perepletkin, I., Kuznetsov, V.
    [2018]. Use of 3C 2D seismic technology to identify oil-bearing reserviors. 88th SEG Annual Meeting. Extended Abstracts, 2461–2465.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kashirtsev, B., Nesterov, I., Fursenko, E.
    [2013]. Biomarkers and adamantanes in crude oils from Cenomanian deposits of Northern West Siberia. Russian Geology and Geophysics, 54, 958–965.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Margrave, G., Lawton, D., Stewart, R.
    [1998] Interpreting channel sands with 3C-3D seismic data. The Leading Edge, 17, 509–513.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hardage, B., DeAngelo, M., MurrayP.
    [2011] Multicomponent seismic technology, SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Antipina, M., Perepletkin, I., Kuznetsov, V.
    [2018]. Use of 3C 2D seismic technology to identify oil-bearing reserviors. 88th SEG Annual Meeting. Extended Abstracts, 2461–2465.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Borisov, A.S.
    [2012] Multicomponent seismic survey. Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University Publishing. (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hardage, B., DeAngelo, M., MurrayP.
    [2011] Multicomponent seismic technology, SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kashirtsev, B., Nesterov, I., Fursenko, E.
    [2013] Biomarkers and adamantanes in crude oils from Cenomanian deposits of Northern West Siberia. Russian Geology and Geophysics, 54, 958–965.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kuznetsov, V.I.
    [2016]. Experimental study of the multiwave (3C) seismic survey. New technologies in petroleum geophysics. (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kuznetsov, V.M., Zhukov, A.P., Nikonov, E.O.
    [2014] Case study of permafrost using multicomponent seismic technology. Seismic exploration technologies, 1, 74–83. (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Margrave, G., Lawton, D., Stewart, R.
    [1998] Interpreting channel sands with 3C-3D seismic data. The Leading Edge, 17, 509–513.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Nesterov, I.I.
    [2015] List of innovative & breakthrough technologies, which have no analogues abroad. Scientific-educational Center of Geology & Mineral resources, Industrial University of Tyumen. (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Puzyrev, N.N.
    [1997] Transverse and exchange waves in seismic survey. Nedra Publishers. (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900603
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900603
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error